This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Friends and family test may save GPs time, says NHS England chief

Exclusive: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) may help GPs to save time, particulary as practices are ‘desperate’ to know how they can improve, NHS England’s lead for primary care has told Pulse.

Dr Mo Dewji said that the test, which is due to be rolled out across UK practices in December, would help GPs save time in the long-term by enabling them to improve their services.

He said: ‘It may feel like the FFT has increased workload, but actually most prac-/-tices are desperate to know how they can improve things. It doesn’t increase the workload all that much, because it’s improving the service.

‘If those improvements go on to make the service better, you can actually save time.’

Pulse reported earlier this week that GPs in England will be required to publish FFT data locally once a month as well as sending it to NHS England for publication on their website. NHS England is to reach a decision on where individual practices should publish their data within the next couple of months.

A six-month pilot of the scheme, involving 31 practices in Bedfordshire CCG in November 2013. was a ‘big success’, according to a report published by NHS England. Practices gathered FTT data using a variety of collection methods, including paper feedback forms and digital questionnaires hosted on a tablet device. Information was fed back to the CCG on a weekly or monthly basis.

Dr Dewji said that the practices who had piloted FFT ‘had not indicated that it is a burden’. However, he conceded that FTT could ‘theroretically’ add to the administrative burden on some GP practices, especially in the early stages.

He said: ‘I do appreciate that theoretically this could be seen as a resource issue in terms of work. But I suspect a lot of the early collection will actually be administrative and then the clincians can come along later. For some it, the administration systems are already available, and this is an extension of that.

‘I’m not sure at present, from the pilots, that it’s going to create a huge amount more work. It’s something we’ll need to review and keep an eye on, but at present it doesn’t appear to be.’

The finer details of how practices should collect FFT data has yet to be ironed out. NHS England has said that it will consult with the GPC, area teams and individual practices to work out the best method during the first months of the roll-out. In the meantime, practices have been encouraged to be ‘flexible’ in their approach to collecting FFT data.  

Research by the Picker Institute Europe found that practices using different collection methods (in combination with demographic factors like patient age and sex) could result in FFT being an unreliable performance measure.

While it has acknowledged the increased risk associated with using different data collection systems, NHS England say that using a variety of methods may encourage more patients to participate in the FFT when it is first rolled out.

Dr Dewji shrugged off suggestions that data collection processes should be standardised across all practices. He said: ‘It would be easy for us to streamline for the sake of it, but we might not pick the right way. However the information is collected, the information from the free text question will always be there, so there won’t be a loss of funds or resources for the sake of it.’  

Dr Dewji said there was ‘no reason’ to think that FTT data would be skewed by a disproportionately high number of responses from patients with chronic conditions, or that doctors could become the victim of Trip Advisor-style ‘revenge reviews’ from patients unhappy with their clinical decisions.

He said: ‘This doesn’t mean that FTT is going to become a method of putting down GPs. There’s always going to be a query that comes along that GPs don’t feel is totally reflective of what happened, but then again that’s no different to when we look at other reviews.

‘We may feel as if it doesn’t feel right, and we may worry about it - but that’s how we feel about any new change. There’s no evidence from the work that happened with the pilot sites or the GP Patient Survey to suggest that this is an issue.

‘There’s an awful lot of evidence that patients who come with one view initially, over time as they get educated, they get far more responsive. If patients engage with us on a regular basis, then they start to be more engaged with their own health.

‘Practices have always engaged with patients in different ways. This isn’t new, it’s just a way of collecting more information.’

Meanwhile, there are no plans to abandon the current GP Patient Survey, which is administered by Ipsos Mori and currently collects data from around 1m patients a year, he said.

Back in 2012, when the FFT was announced, fellow GPC negotiator Dr Peter Holden said it was ‘trite trouble’, and would not reflect reality of good GP practice because GPs have to tell patients ‘things they don’t want to hear’.

The test has also been criticised by CCG leaders who feared it could be misused to ‘beat up’ NHS staff.

Readers' comments (49)

  • Ha ha ha ha ha ha hoo hoo hoo hee hee hee.

    What a load of c@*£K.

    What would 'save practices time' is for NHS England to actually pay practices what they are owed to they don't need to chase absent adminidroids of 10s of £1000s they are owed for weeks and months at a time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In an effort to find a silver lining to this latest NHSE hoop we are required to jump through, I can only hope that the vocal 10% of my patients who use their appointment to complain about access scare off all those other patients who are so desperately keen to register with us as new patients. In the midst of this recruitment crisis, NHSE refused our application to close our lists, but NOW want to hear what patients think? No money for new premises or to fund more GPs, but plenty to undertake silly polls....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I used to write long rational thought provoking comments in pulse on rubbish like this. All I can say now is "idiot" and it's all f*%&39 up!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • unbelievably out of touch extraordinary moron.
    fft...forum for malicious ignorant commentary like the daily fail.
    yet more solid proof that nhse is profoundly and scarily unfit for purpose..general practice is in crisis..all they do is come up with such patheticism.
    words fail me..not a week goes by with yet more waves of the tsunami of utter trash emanating from nhse.
    the entire 'organisation' should be disbanded.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Today, I spent an entire day on one DES. Yes, I closed all appointments with me so I can earn back the funding that's been taken away by Mr Hunt.

    If anyone complains about the access, I should tell them this was all due to the governmental initiative which gave me a choice between making redundancies or reducing access. It's there anywhere my patient's can then comment on friend and family test of the conservative party?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doesn't NHS Choices feedback already exist for this purpose (with no extra practice admin necessary)? There are also the existing GP Practice Surveys, PPGs, suggestion boxes, direct feedback, 360 degree ffeedback, etc, etc, etc. All the above can be used to modify service provision if necessary and possible within the current constraints.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nhs choices .. Great if you believe and many do looking at the 5 star rating. From 2 patients among 10000 is acceptable .the costs of running this are shocking

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been deleted

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Awful spin from NHS England's lead for primary care. Anyway this was meant to be simple but now have a 14 page document which refers to other documents for clarification and areas yet to be clarified. Far from it? We have been misled! Is this not ripe for a boycott because, as GPs, we could not recommend this scheme to friends and family...? What are the BMA doing about this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • This comment has been deleted

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say