This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

GMC waters down ‘back to work’ duty for doctors

GPs will have a new duty to encourage ‘fulfilling  activity’ in their patients under new guidance approved by GMC Council, after the regulator backed away from a previous proposal to specify that they must urge patients to go back to work.

The change to the Good Medical Practice guidance comes after criticism from GPs that the regulator had been pressurised by the Government to force doctors into supporting its back to work drive.

Pulse reported a year ago that the GMC was proposing to include a duty on doctors ‘to encourage patients with long-term conditions to stay in, or return to, employment.’ 

But the proposal – drafted with input from the Department of Work and Pensions and based on evidence that work can be ‘life-enhancing’- was met with heavy criticism from GPs and the BMA.

In a strongly worded submission to the consultation earlier this year, the BMA warned the duty was a ‘possible political capture of Good Medical Practice’ and undermined the duty on doctors to put patient care first.

In response, GMC Council has reworded the duty to remove the reference to ‘employment’ and has approved a duty on encouraging patients to develop ‘fulfilling activities’. The final guidance will be published in November, subject to approval by the GMC chair, and will come into force next year.

The final draft says: ‘You must support patients in caring for themselves to empower them to improve and maintain their health.

‘This may, for example, include… supporting patients to make lifestyle changes were appropriate, including changes to diet, exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption, doing voluntary or paid work or other fulfilling activities.’

In minutes from a meeting held last month the GMC admitted that the emphasis needed to be on doctors ‘empowering’ patients to improve their health.

‘The working group considered in detail the range of views expressed by Council on the inclusion of guidance on supporting patients in caring for themselves.

‘The Group concluded that some amplification of the principle was valuable, but that the emphasis should be on doctors empowering patients to improve their health, rather than specifying ways in which the patient may do this.

‘Nonetheless, the Working Group agreed that the guidance should include a reference to – amongst other things – “doing voluntary or paid work or other fulfilling activity”.’

Dr Kambiz Boomla, a GP in Tower Hamlets, said the guidance was unlikely to have much affect when there is little other support for patients out of work.

He said: ‘The real issue is not the wording in the guidance, it is that the Government not putting the infrastructure in place to help people back into work.

‘We have had people come into the practice crying and in tears over being told they have got to work and their benefits are being cut off, although it is clear to everybody that they are not capable of doing what they are asked to do, or the jobs aren’t available.

It is not joined up Government, to advise people to go back to work while making austerity cuts to the voluntary sector for example.’


Related images

  • GMC plaque  Ralph Hodgson

Readers' comments (3)

  • I wish the government and the GMC stop using trendy buzz words to dress themselves up.

    "Empowerment" - to increasing the spiritual, political, social, educational, gender, or economic strength of individuals and communities.

    What is this supposed to mean in clinical terms?
    Do I offer them a religion (Oops, latest GMC guidance tells us not to)?
    Offer them insight into the difference between current government policy and the labour (ditto, see above)?
    Should I teach my patients maths (your sick note was for 28 days, so you see, 1+28 was 29th so you should have come back 2 weeks ago rather asking for back dated sick note)?
    Not sure how to improve gender strength to be honest.......
    And finally should I offer to improve their "economical strength" by telling them to go back to work when I know there are no jobs out there (especially when I know as an employer, I know they are in a very weak situation)? Or perhaps GMC means I should do this by giving illicit, but commonly practised back dated notes for any condition of their choice?

    What does economical strength mean anyway? Or well, back to Wikipedia for more answers...........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I vote that we go back to the hipocratic oath - much simpler and to the point. The GMC are continually coming up with increasingly bureacractic layers of political regulation on doctors. In the main, doctors are all hardworking, conscientous people that always strive to do their best by their patient - oh and probably spend 0% of their time reading the latest 'updates' from the GMC. Doctors are increasingly finding that the regulatory bodies treat them with utter contempt and make us feel like we are all untrustworthy criminals to always be assumed guilty of professional misconduct until proven innocent... ;)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I cannot see why it is my duty to encourage patients to do anything they do not want to do. If they want to smoke 60 fags a day, drink a bottle of vodka for breakfast and watch daytime TV with a spliff in hand, then that is their business. I'll still be there to relieve their symptoms when they need me. That's what I do.
    If the Govt think they shouldn't access the NHS for their drinking/alcohol/drug related illnesse then the Govt should make that decsion and action it. I am an independent medical practitioner, not a lackey for the treasury.
    Do the GMC really think that when I am down the pub with my mates I'll be saying 'Are you sure you want a beer, it's awfully bad for you, you know. Just a Perrier for me, with five portions of fruit in it'?

    The GMC need to learn to stick to their true role - to check that I am not pissed up or high whilst I am seeing my patients. That's all. (I suppose watching Jeremy Kyle might also suggest that I am unfit to practice).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say