This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP 'black alert' guidance suggests cap of 25-35 routine consultations a day

GP practices facing an unsustainable workload should divert or cancel all routine appointments, under a new 'black alert' system proposed by the BMA.

The BMA, which voted in favour of GP practice black alerts last year, has established four 'operational pressures escalation levels' similar to the system used in hospitals.

Whether a practice can take the action unilaterally, without prior approval, is currently unclear.

The BMA guidance, prepared by the GP Committee, suggests that 25 routine appointments a day are a 'safe' limit for individual GPs, with 35 deemed as 'unsafe'. For more complex consultations, the number is lower.

After this, the practice should 'divert patients to other clinicians or alternative providers or later sessions/days'.

If all GPs in a practice are working at unsafe levels, a locality hub should take on its 'overspill' patients.

Meanwhile, if all practices in the same locality are reporting unsafe working levels, all routine long-term conditions clinics should be cancelled, and hospitals told 'discharge management will be suspended until primary care recovers'.

This comes as a Pulse survey revealed that GPs in the UK have an average of 41.5 patient contacts every day - 60% more than the number considered safe by European GPs.

The guidance says that 'appropriate limits on workload will depend on the unique circumstances of each practice and the preferences of each individual GP, as well as the complexity of care being provided'.

The BMA suggests therefore 'a range in the number of appointments per day to show when a GP may move into more "unsafe" practice (red), depending on whether the appointments are routine or complex'.

The guidance says: 'For example, up to 25 routine doctor-patient contacts a day could be deemed ‘safe’, with GPs only reaching "unsafe" working levels at 35 or more routine patient contacts per day.

'In comparison, anything over 15 doctor-patient contacts for long-term, complex or mental health conditions could be said to be "unsafe" due to the more demanding nature of the consultations.'

The BMA said that the system 'will only succeed within a locality where a range of safe working levels has been discussed and agreed, and where practices are assured that all other providers are operating above agreed minimum quality and capacity measures'.

It added that 'such a system will need peer-controlled audit and free exchange of information'.

Pulse has contacted NHS England for comment on whether it supports the guidance.

GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said the guidance meant 'working within the existing contractual mechanisms to be able to deliver a safe and sustainable service'.

He said: 'It's in everybody's interest whether that's the local CCG, NHS England or general practice, to have a sustainable safe service. We would hope that local commissioners will work with practices to enable that to happen...

'No right-minded thinking person would want their patients to be seen by tired, exhausted doctors.'

Dr Vautrey said the black alert system was necessary as GP workloads 'increasingly unmanageable' owing to 'the demand of more complex patient needs, widespread recruitment and retention issues, and years of underinvestment – all of which takes a toll on GPs’ physical, mental and social health'.

The proposal of capping appointments and diverting to overflow hubs formed part of the GPC's Urgent Prescription for General Practice published two years ago, and the BMA's Annual Representative Meeting voted in favour of GP black alerts last June.

The operational pressures escalation levels’ (OPEL) alert system

Level 1

Individual GPs or other clinicians are at or above the locally agreed safe level of working.

Action: Internal practice action to divert patients to other clinicians or alternative providers or later sessions/days. Notify position to Locality Hub.

Level 2

One practice reaches unsafe working levels.

Action: Practice reports status to Locality Hub. Hub initiates improved triage and allows practice access to booked overspill appointments.

Level 3

Several locality practices reach unsafe working levels

Action: Hub initiates improved or centralised triage and releases all overspill appointments. Other practices and Hub clinics are alerted to potential “Black Alert” status.

Level 4

All practices in the locality report unsafe working.

Action: Locality Hub switches available workforce to address overspill (Triaged and booked appointments) thereby cancelling routine LTC and specialist clinics. Locality alerts Hospital that discharge management will be suspended until primary care recovers. Planned early discharges are therefore temporarily stopped.

Source: BMA

 

 

 

 

 

Readers' comments (29)

  • No Hub locally in rural Lincolnshire seeing many more than this daily.Always on black alert or should I say brown alert.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So if 25 patients a day will be the new maximum and currently the average is 41.5. So 16.5 patients per GP per day will be seen in a hub! This will require 39.8% more GPs to work in hubs. Where are they coming from and where is the extra 39.8% of funds?

    This ain’t going to happen. Dream on..

    Perhaps GPs will get a 39.8% reduction in income.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What Now?

    its a case of defining safe workloads for the amount of pay... of course the workload is much more... a line has to be drawn in the sand
    and if more is required above this safe level then more funding is required
    stop being the martyrs slowly worked to death
    embrace safe levels for the given pay

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What Now?

    4 patients per hour
    bring all in at 10 min intervals at the start
    some will be quick some slow
    use the remainder for the days admin duties
    True emergencies can be fixed in as necessary
    3 HOURS 12 Patients

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don’t appear to be at real coal face. 31 face to face 21 telephone advice or notes review following OOH attendance.

    Only 2 admissions though, so either I’m crap at assessment or just on the ragged edge.

    This is going to implode and will end in tears for all concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All GPs have been working way beyond this for years, what about phone calls etc as well as the face to face consultations. Hospital clinics are capped but much easier to do as all prebooked. Very hard to control this other than reporting your practice unsafe and even then there are not enough doctors in the Country to take up the slack.Worldwide problem not just UK

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nobody stops GP partners servicing demand how they want now. If we are asking for 40% of our average daily numbers to go elsewhere it won't be long before they have to take away the money to pay for that which will threaten the viability of most practices. Not sure this has been thought through adequately.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • sounds very sensible, bring it on and I MAY go back to BMA membership. What happens to patients after my 25-30 would not be my responsibility. Anyway with recent episode of GP getting a slap on wrist for not seeing acute asthma, we are better off not seeing too many anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Different patients need varying amounts of time. Most GPs would accept some days being longer than others because of this variation , but the fact is that somehow our day is now 11-12 hours every day , and we are continually rushing, working too fast and not having time to reflect. The simple answer is we need about twices as many doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It’ll all be solved by Working at Scale, primary care being taken over by hospitals and tighter regulation of the hopelessly slack cottage industry that is general practice.
    Right.
    Nothing to do with the simple fact of the exodus of GPs in their mid 50’s

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say