This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GP contract negotiations delayed 'because of Brexit', says GPC

Exclusive The unusually late conclusion of the annual GP contract negotiations is due to the UK’s vote to leave the EU, the GPC has told Pulse.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said this year’s negotiations are ‘no more difficult than normal’ but the delay is due to the ‘wider political landscape’ which has changed.

The issues under discussion as part of the contract negotiations include the future of the QOF and DESs, the annual contractual uplift and ensuring GP practices are accurately reimbursed for their expenses, including the hike in CQC fees.

There is little indication about when the negotiations will conclude, but Dr Vautrey told Pulse they will be 'as soon as possible'.

He added: I think it is unusual that they have gone into the New Year, but we want to try and resolve issues as quickly as possible, so we can let all practices know what the outcome is.'

Dr Vautrey said he thinks that 'the main reason [for the delay] really has been Brexit'.

He said: 'The change in Government, the change of circumstances, from Number 10 downwards really, has caused the initial delay. We didn’t really get started with any serious form of negotiation until much later in the year than what would normally have happened, and that has had an implication right through the process.

'So it is not that the negotiations are more difficult than normal, it’s more that the wider political landscape changed.’

Dr Vautrey said that the mechanism to calculate expenses - one of the outstanding demands from the GPC's Urgent Prescription for General Practice - was 'part of ongoing negotiations' and that the the GPC hopes 'to agree a process that would give certainty to practices that their rising expenses will be covered'.

But the GPC may face an uphill struggle to ensure all increases in expenses are reimbursed.

In recent supplementary evidence submitted to the DDRB said that 'it does not not necessarily follow that, just because a particular expense category has increased in the past... we should necessarily automatically fund an increase relating to that going forward'.

It also hit back at the BMA's evidence claim that GPs have maximised their ability to make efficiencies, saying that 'practices do have opportunities to reduce their costs', including through federating - or even simply clubbing together to purchase supplies and achieve economies of scale'.

Expected expense increases for next year include not just indemnity price hikes - some £30m of which will be covered under promises made in the General Practice Forward View - but also massive hikes to CQC fees.

What else can GPs expect from contract negotiations?

With regards to the core funding uplift, the Department of Health has mandated the DDRB to make a recommendation in line with its 1% cap on pay rises, with health secretary Jeremy Hunt suggesting this could be tweaked to specifically motivate a growing cohort of salaried GPs.

Dr Vautrey says: 'They have said 1% [in the mandate]... but I think the other thing to remember as well is that a lot of what we negotiate now you also need to add local funding streams as well. So for many practices, the changes to the funding that comes directly from CCGs provide a significant part of their running costs now as well.'

In its evidence to the DDRB, the BMA suggested GPs should get a 2% pay rise.

Contract negotiations will also be focusing on the future of QOF, after the parties agreed last year to make no changes in 2016/17 with the view to review 'the end' of the clinical incentive scheme. They also agreed to negotiate an end to the bureaucracy-heavy Avoiding Unplanned Admissions DES.

But, as Pulse reported last week, this will not be replaced with a DES to take forward Mr Hunt's ambitious one-stop shop plans for GP practices to do outpatients appointments, with the health secretary instead targeting local enhanced services for the rollout.

Readers' comments (11)

  • If the starting point is 2% we've lost already.

    Why is the starting point not 10% which is probably a better reflection of the increase in costs...?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP contract negotiations delayed because of weather.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    There is always a problem with principled negotiation when only one side has any principles...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "But the GPC may face an uphill struggle to ensure all increases in expenses are reimbursed."

    So are they (both DoH and GPC) recommending we drop services to address the funding shortage? I hope they are not expecting us to ake yet another pay cut again (over 12% in 9 years?)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When you vote in same cardigans every election to the BMAs and LMCs, they in turn elect the same self serving and incompetent BMA and GPC 'leaders'.
    The carousel then goes round and round bringing you to this culmination point of no return. Who's to blame?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brexit is an excuse, it's not going to save or bury NHS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At least they are drawing to a close in England, in Wales they are only just starting this month as they hadn't finished the negotiations for the 15-17 contract!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Council of Despair

    any news re: Northern Ireland GPs? have they done the sensible thing and left the NHS yet?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why did the GPC not ballot ? Why all this whingeing = ' maybe we won't get all the expenses' Whinge, whinge, whinge.
    But when it comes to ballot, they think everything is hunky dory.
    No wonder Mr Hunt has these boys in a tailspin. Even they don't know what they are doing.
    What was the reason given for not balloting? Oh, everything is promised to be OK.
    From another subject in this issue, we are the idiots.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The unusually late conclusion of the annual GP contract negotiations is due to the UK’s vote to leave the EU, the GPC has told Pulse."
    Really? I thought it was Trump winning the election. Or, perhaps, Climate Change. No, no, it's demographic changes and the ageing population.
    For God's sake, are we actually contributing towards those people's pensions?

    Climate change

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say