Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP leader persuades council to oppose brutal NHS savings plan

An LMC chair has persuaded their local council to reject plans to cut costs by overhauling local NHS services.

Dr Jackie Applebee, chair of Tower Hamlets LMC, submitted a petition to the local council with around 500 signatures demanding that plans to save £578m from the North and East London health and social care budgets be scrapped.

The petition was first announced in January with 30 signatures but was forced by the council to wait until July before they could present it at a council meeting.

Dr Applebee, who led the petition against the local Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP), said the saving targets covering eight London boroughs and seven CCGs are ‘like being asked to spin gold out of straw’.

She said the plans are 'predicated on being able to move care out of the hospital into the community'.

She said: ‘There is no capacity in the community to take on extra care. General practice is in dire straits, with 84% in a GPC survey last year saying that their workload undermines their ability to provide safe patient care.’

The petition adds that signatories are 'gravely concerned' the plans will see 'a dangerous deterioration in the services that the NHS is able to provide'. 

Earlier this year both Hackney and Waltham Forest councils also rejected the north east London plans because of a failure to consult with the public when creating the plans.

Deputy mayor of Tower Hamlets, councillor Rachael Saunders, assured the petitioners that the council ‘will not be signing up' to the plans and is ‘very much looking forward’ to fighting against budget cuts.

In response to the petition, Cllr Saunders said: ‘One of my greatest concerns actually is local accountability as well as the enormous cuts that you have spoken about.’

She said at the meeting that decision-making is being ‘sucked up’ to the regional level when the council has ‘been very much used to being able to collaborate on a borough level with the NHS’.

She added: ‘It’s the Conservative government, which is responsible for the chronic underfunding of the NHS, and it makes it even more difficult when our budgets are being cut as well, so when social care and NHS services are being cut together, local people are really suffering.’

A spokesperson for East London Health and Care Partnership, in charge of drawing up the plans, said: 'We have a good working relationship with the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and are getting on with the job of working together as a system to protect and improve health and care services for local people.'

What are STPs proposing?

Pulse’s scrutiny of the 44 STPs, which have been drawn up by CCGs, councils and NHS trusts around England, have previously revealed how:

 

Readers' comments (2)

  • Just Your Average Joe

    Moving more complex patients out into the community will inevitably mean the need for more home visits, and the time consuming nature of these including travel - make it near impossible to cope when workload and time is already so pressured.

    Unless there are hospital outreach teams to deliver all the care for those in the community - it is not possible for this to go ahead with GPs doing this work - as it as always is unfunded, and expected GPs will swallow it for free, hence cost savings.

    We need a new contract which charges for every patient contact, and higher for Home visits - and stop this nonsense of all you can eat care for free within a tiny proportion of the NHS budget when Primary care has the largest proportion of all contacts for less than it costs to insurance your cat!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    There is a chap doing the practice rounds who calls himself a "Resilience Trainer"

    Being a locum I had nothing to do with him.

    My resilience comprises of saying "NO" loudly and often.

    This is what is needed with this rubbish. These complex need patients are not GMS patients.

    Tell the powers that be that the answer is NO and keep on saying it.

    No no no no no no no no no no no and just in case you didn't hear, no.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say