This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GP practices look to merge to stave off closure

Exclusive Accountants are receiving an increase in enquiries from GP practices looking to merge amid recruitment problems and a ‘funding squeeze’, with the measure often a last resort to avoid closure.

Accountants have told Pulse that MPIG withdrawal, PMS changes and a ‘constant squeeze’ on funding has left practices in a position where they are forced to continue giving up their independent status and join other practices.

LMCs have also reported a similar trend, with some practices seeing it as the ‘only option’ to avoid closure.

The reports come as Pulse launched its campaign to Stop Practice Closures, in which GP leaders have cited recruitment issues,cuts to MPIG and PMS funding as the main factors for upwards of 100 practices closing or potentially closing.

Last year GP leaders warned that GP practices would be forced to merge to survive at the Pulse Live Conference in Birmingham, while health minister Dr Dan Poulter told MPs in March that practices at risk of closure as a result of MPIG funding withdrawal should be ‘looking to help themselves’ by, for example, working together at scale.

Keith Taylor from Newcastle-based firm BW Medical Accountants said merging ‘is very much on people’s agenda at the moment’, particularly among smaller practices.

He said: ‘They are looking at preserving their financial position amid the constant squeeze on income and they are hoping to achieve economies of scale within a larger entity.’

‘Obviously we are embracing any change they want to make as long as it is for the right reasons and they are working with the right people. I think it is a fairly sensible decision to make if you are a single-handed GP struggling under the new funding regime. Obviously then a merger is a better option rather than a closure.’

Baker Tilly head of medical services Bob Senior said changes to funding such as the MPIG withdrawal was behind the trend.

He said: ‘Certainly we are seeing an increasing number looking at this and being aware that as very small independent practices life is going to get very difficult going forward. They’re thinking that financially we need to be doing something here, because by the time we get to the end of 2020 the correction factor will have completely gone and we will really be facing quite stark differences in funding compared to larger practices.’

LMCs have seen a similar a trend. Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire LMC chief executive Dr Peter Graves, whose local area is being severely hit by the GP recruitment crisis, said that for some practices merging was the only option to avoid having to close.

He said: ‘I know of five practices, out of 235, which are stretched enough to be in talks with neighbouring practices about merging to hopefully prevent closure. In April we carried out a workforce survey, at an 80% response rate, showing that 30% of practices are carrying a GP vacancy.’

In East Anglia, four mergers have already taken place since the start of this financial year, according to NHS England’s local area team. Chair of Norfolk and Waveney LMC, Dr Tim Morton, said: ‘Smaller practices see themselves as increasingly vulnerable, certainly in relation to recruitment.’

‘For a large practice if a partner resigns you take it on the chin and you work through it. For a very small practice losing a partner is devastating. Gone are the days when it has been easy to recruit partners and I think this is one of the main drivers for, certainly the smaller practices, to seek security in larger arrangements.’

And some practices that are merging are looking to create ‘super practices’, which are able to provide more services to patients at scale, according to Aaron Swinton, medical accountant at Sandison Easson & Co in Wilmslow. But he said many of these clients had not moved into the same premises as these were not available.

He said: ‘Funding for a super premises, it is not something that is going to happen overnight. Doctors are discussing what they can do going forwards because with all the funding changes, including the pension changes, it’s all coming out of doctors’ pocket.’

‘At the end of the day, they’ve got mortgages to pay and they’ve got to make ends meet so they are looking at various options, and a merger is one of those.’

Healthcare partnerships-specialist accountant Luke Bennett, who is based in Cornwall, said consolidation would happen over time, although many practices may choose to wait for ‘natural wastage’ before closing branch surgeries because of a ‘reluctance to make people redundant’.

He said: ‘When you start to think well if we are going to save costs, where are those costs coming from. Unless you’re closing a surgery then really you are still going to need the same number of nurses, you are still going to need the same number of receptionists.’

However GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said that although the consolidation of GP practices was inevitable amid the squeeze on funding it could have a negative impact on patients if it led to the closing of branch surgeries.

He said: ‘Practices are increasingly looking at how they might work in bigger grouping with some doing so through networks whilst others are merging in to larger practices. It is increasingly hard for small practices to cope with the increased workload and bureaucracy that NHS management and regulatory environment places upon them and working in bigger units can help deal with this.’

‘However patients value small practices and the continuity of care that a practice offers when it is embedded in the local community and so it is essential that as practices get bigger, or work in bigger networks, they retain this essential characteristic that has made general practice so successful.’

Related images

  • Premise - GP practice - hospital corridor - doctor - premises - online

Readers' comments (14)

  • first merger / alliance
    then federate
    then all salaried
    then sold off
    end of profession

    dental / accountant / legal professionals must be shaking their heads in disbelief

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • well put.......spineless negotiation and empty threats leave GPs vulnerable.
    Mass resignation, strict working to contract without taking on extra, refer rather than manage in primary the power shift back to prevent the demise of primary care as we know it.
    Private organisations promise lots, deliver little and often can't make the contracts work!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The original article looked at ways in which general practice could consider organisational efficiencies so that the essential patient/continuity of care/family practice tradition can be bolstered. Sharing back office resources, using technology creatively, developing federated structures need not mean the destruction of general practice but it does mean that general practice has to realize the inevitability of change and try and manage that process rather than have as its only refrain: more money

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The money doesn'rt exist to carry on as we were, even if the govt did want to fund us. But it also coincides with what United Health, Boots etc want before they buy us out - already formed into bigger units, redundancy costs already paid by GPs, fewer staff to TUPE, fewer buildings to buy out, and so on.

    So the process of merging will not stop the sell-out and the loss of independence, merely delay it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There are plenty of examples around the country where effective federations are working to maintain the GP led tradition but adapting to new circumstances

    Assuming that cash will continue to be forthcoming to support less than cost effective small units is I'm afraid unrealistic - Failing to adapt to thrive is irresponsible - 'private' providers may well pick up contracts but that is where the current independent GP contractors have failed or refused to assess their own business strategically

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11.45
    In many areas - especially rural ones - federations and mergers are not feasible.
    What is your solution to the problem of providing GP services to residents of small or remote settlements - or *should* such communities expect no GP or other healthcare - as well as no fast broadband?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • reduce clinics, refer to ED, telephone triage, adopt online services, develop patient groups that protect the surgery politically. Reduce your stress by seeing less patients.

    do not merge!!! if you do you will lose your independence. if you lose your independence then you are no longer a general practitioner and you might as well stay in hospital medicine.

    practices are merging due to inability to staff and cope. they are making the decision as a small group, what makes people think that they will cope in a larger group, with more partners to think about?

    there is no such thing as a merger. there is only a takeover of smaller fish by bigger fish.

    it is the wrong direction of travel for British General Practice. it must stop. We do not support it.

    - anonymous salaried!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with last comment
    There is a lot of misinformation going on
    Gp practice s tend to be cost effective
    Virgin health at Al are giving back contracts they can't afford to employ salaried GPs and still achieve KPIs
    This will play out when DH realises smaller Practice s in the heart of the community are good value for money

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11.45
    Why are federations and mergers not appropriate for rural situations?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Distance ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say