Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPC passes vote of no confidence in Capita after 'months of failures'

The GPC has passed a motion of no confidence in Capita for its primary care support services following a series of failures, which it claims are putting patients at risk. 

The committee passed the motion at its meeting today, referencing ’months of concerns’ around ’failures in patient record transfer, delivery of supplies and payment problems’.

It also called for the abandoning of plans to remove patients from practice lists if they haven’t used GP services in five years, which was exclusively highlighted by Pulse.

A statement by the BMA said: 'This decision was taken after months of concerns highlighted by practices in England about the failures in patient record transfer, delivery of supplies and payment problems since NHS England handed over responsibility to Capita, as well as the very real concerns highlighted yesterday in NHS England's plans to remove patients from practice lists.'

Pulse has reported extensively on the problems faced by practices since Capita started implementing its new schemes from April.

It revealed how the BMA said practices had been left without deliveries of basic clinical supplies and had accumulated piles of patients’ notes – with some practices saying they waited four weeks for a collection.

The GPC also said that practices reported  patient notes going missing, while the Information Commissioner’s Office is enquiring about information governance breaches.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul wrote to NHS England last month demanding that GPs be compensated for the ‘systematic failure’ of support services, and indemnified against any serious incidents that may have arisen.

Dr Nagpaul said: 'The GPC has passed a vote of no confidence in Capita. We believe that the commissioned service they provide for primary care support in England is putting patients at risk and has caused serious disruption for general practice.

’The plans for removing patients from practice lists should be abandoned. Every person in the UK has a fundamental right to be registered with a local GP practice at all times. We are calling on NHS England to meet with GPC England to discuss these plans before any further action is taken.’

Dr Uzma Ahmad, Walsall LMC medical secretary and a member of GPC, said the committee was completely in agreement.

She added: 'We agree that Capita has not done what is expected of it and NHS England is not holding it to account. They have put patient safety at risk and there is more to come out around further concerns.

'At a time when we are under pressure, having problems with support services is another draw on general practice, and we are at a point where we cannot allow further damage.'

Pulse revealed yesterday that GPs will be expected to provide primary care support provider Capita with a list of suspected ghost patients every year under the biggest ever list-cleansing drive, which could increase practices' workload burdens and result in them losing funding.

A Capita spokesperson told Pulse: 'Capita have been engaged by NHS England to undertake this major transformation of primary care services from what was a locally agreed, fragmented system to one that is standardised, effective and efficient.

'Given the scale and complexity of transformation there will undoubtedly be challenges. We are working closely with NHS England and our key stakeholders including the GPC. NHS England have recognised the progress we have made and together we will ensure it continues.'

 

The problems with primary care support services

Money coins 2700x1800px 1

Money coins 2700x1800px 1

NHS England opted to save £40 million a year from its support services budget and tendered for a single national provider for Primary Care Support England (PCSE).

The winner, Capita, has centralised support services to three national hubs and implemented a single online ‘portal’ for practices to order supplies and ‘track’ the movement of patient records.

Pulse has documented issues, from FP10 shortages, to patient notes turning up in a carpark, that have spiked since April’s overhaul and GP leaders have been urging practices to report every issue to NHS England.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul wrote to NHS England demanding practices be compensated for the ‘systematic failure’ of PCSE, and indemnified against any claims as a result of support service issues.

The timetable by Primary Care Support England - the arm of Capita that manages the services - shows that new services for payments, screenings and performers list will be implemented from April 2017.

Read more here

 

Readers' comments (16)

  • Yep, Capita have also taken over performers list applications, with DISASTROUS results. My application took a LONG time, and was fraught with disasters. I had to make well over 30 phone calls to get it sorted out, each time speaking to a different person. HEE, LASCA, and Capita all failed to liaise properly with each other resulting in me turning up for my face to face document review in fancy rented offices in central Liverpool (wonder how they can afford that??) and no-one else showed up. Wasted day off work plus travel time and car parking which was not reimbursed and I had to retained the following week. What a waste of time! The whole thing is a disgrace. I have made several complaints to Capita and HEE none of which have been responded to.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The joys of privatisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    a motion of no confidence, eh? From the BMA, eh? That will have them quaking in their shoes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can't think of a more irrelevant, pointless and ineffectual action they could have taken. Had they stormed their head offices with spud guns it might have raised the profile more.

    BMA - what are you actually there for?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Typical Chaand modus operandii - makes great speeches, writes a good letter, holds a vote,......
    BUT actually does a big fat NOTHING.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just showing anger or frustration doesnt help chaand.Action speak louder than words.Do something!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    Primary Care Support. What a euphemism. Am acting as my own practice manager as well as clinician at present and my access to Open Exeter disappeared - so I am unable to see the statements and check that the practice is receiving the correct resources.
    So I rang and was passed around all three of their offices. Told that there were two people authorised to reinstate - and they were both on leave. Now I find that there is NO authorised administrative agent for Swindon, probably alone in the country, so no-one has responsibility. I have sent off the requested application form. Again. And not even an acknowledgement. My accountant cannot complete the accounts. I cannot check the practice finances. What a farrago!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter, try Open Exeter in Internet Explorer, it still works properly there with smartcard access. If you try Open Exeter in Google Chrome it doesn't work and you get messages saying your password has expired etc

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Anonymous | Junior doctor22 Jul 2016 8:33am
    Just showing anger or frustration doesnt help chaand.Action speak louder than words.Do something!!!"

    We can't, if we try to do anything or organise anything then the LMC and GPC will not back us up, don't upset the applecart, it's not good for getting a CBE old boy don't you know!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    thanks anon PM this am - I was using internet explorer but it still doesn't like me!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say