This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

GPs 'can't abandon their contracts with the NHS', says Hunt

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt has said that GPs have an 'obligation to follow their contracts', following calls from local GP leaders for the BMA to support vulnerable practices to go private. 

Mr Hunt was responding to a question about the motion set for debate at next week’s England LMCs Conference, first reported by Pulse, which called for practices to be 'supported to operate within a private, alternative model' if they feel they can no longer operate within the NHS.

Speaking to MPs on the Commons Health Select Committee, the health secretary said practices' 'contract with the state' was their principal source of income, so they have a responsibility to look after NHS patients.

Responding to a question on the motion, Mr Hunt said: 'I would listen to everything that came out of any BMA conference carefully but the Government makes policy on the NHS, not the GPs, and they do have an obligation to follow the contracts that they have.

'But obviously if there is concern about the levels of workload and about the capacity of the system then that is something that I am going to listen to very carefully.''

Labour MP Ben Bradshaw - a former health minister himself - asked Mr Hunt: ‘[GPs] are private contractors aren't they and you couldn't just stop them [abandoning the NHS]. Does this not show how bad things have got to that GPs are even considering en masse abandoning the NHS?’

Mr Hunt responded by saying the Conservative Party had wanted GPs to be NHS employees when the NHS was set up in 1948.

He added: 'The point I am making is, yes they are private contractors but they also do have a contract with the state which is the source of their income, and we have a responsibility under that contract to look after all NHS patients in the area they operate.'

Explaining the pressure GPs are under, Mr Hunt said: 'I think we have to look at the underlying reason why those kind of motions are being debated, and I think it is GPs feel that their workload is too high, their job has become too stressful. Sometimes they feel that they are on some sort of hamster wheel of between 30 and 40 ten-minute appointments every day, and it is exhausting.

'The long-term solution to that is to get more capacity into the system, which is why we have our plan to recruit 5,000 more GPs which we are in the middle of trying to deliver. Some bits of that plan are going well, other bits less well, but I am absolutely determined to deliver that and I think that is the long-term solution.'

He added that he hoped GPs had taken from recent announcements he had made that this was 'an area of great concern for the Government as well and we are taking a number of measures to try and relieve the pressures on general practice'.

Explaining to the committee how he was working on resolving the GP workforce crisis, Mr Hunt mentioned both the recently unveiled state-backed indemnity scheme, and the expanded incentive scheme to get GP trainees into areas that have found it difficult to recruit.

At the same hearing, Mr Hunt said NHS was struggling financially because demand 'has grown faster' than the Department of Health 'had anticipated', linking growth in emergency services demand to ‘underinvesting’ in general practice.

Mr Hunt said: ‘We can do an enormous amount to bring down demand for emergency care. In the ambulance service we have 4,400 999 calls more every day than we had in 2010, that creates massive pressure on the emergency services.

'One of the reasons for the pressure is we have underinvested in general practice in recent decades, and have underinvested in the kind of community care, so that would mean that people would not get to the point where they have to dial 999 and additional expensive hospital care. That’s what the whole sustainability model is about.’

 

Readers' comments (35)

  • All we need is few brave souls to leave NHS and set up successful private practices.Currently many GP are rightly scared of post NHS scenario (staff redundancy/ overhead / mortgage). When few practices will show the way that it is possible exodus will begin.
    Then we can dictate our prices If government wants our services.
    So we need to suffer more till some of us to become bit more brave and jump this sinking ship

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Under investment is only but one reason Jezza. It is the paperwork, work load, bureaucracy, passing all the social work risks to us, encouraging complaints, interfering with our work and you stoking up the demand and cutting the beds at the same time that is the problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Gund

    Fight fight fight .....and VOTE LEAVE ! The Titanic is sinking.... 🚢NHS⬇️

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'GPs can't abandon their contracts with the NHS' says Hunt.
    Mr Hunt- I am a fervent supporter of the NHS and want it to continue for the benefit of ALL people in this country.
    However part of the problem at the moment is really that the likes of you get away with spreading shite like this. This is simply not true- who gives you this information or do you just make it up in your head?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I assume that the vast majority of people who used a "private" service would be exempt from any fees , under 18s, over 60s, unemployed etc. etc. So very little would change other than penalising the squeezed middle.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In the past private GPs were definitely able to refer patients to secondary care through the NHS. I am not sure if that is still possible. If it is then patients would only have to pay for private primary-care and presumably privately prescribed medication. Patients wouldn’t have to pay for secondary care. If enough GPs become private, insurance companies will develop cover for private primary care.

    My other point is that this just shows how scared Jeremy Hunt is.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • watchdoc | GP Partner/Principal01 Nov 2017 1:15pm

    I don’t see why patients over 65, the unemployed, disabled et cetera would be exempt from fees in a private GP service. This only applies to NHS care for medication.. Of course the ideal situation would be for the NHS to part support private primary care and to fully fund the elderly etc, as exists just about everywhere else in the world.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If GPs are private contractors then surely they can leave! And we should simply because he says we can't. I say follow the dentists.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear All,
    If you want something to happen get in contact with your local LMC and tell them how you want them to vote at the English LMC's conference next week. They are there to represent your views. If you do not let them know what you are thinking they will vote in isolation. You have the power, use it.
    Regards
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I second to that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say