This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Medical accountants warn of locum GP tax hit

Locums could lose £2,000 a year under a new Government clampdown on people contracting their services under a corporate structure.

The Government's Spring Budget has announced a reduction to the tax-free dividend allowance from £5,000 to £2,000, set to come in from April next year.

The budget statement said this would 'reduce the tax differential between the self-employed and employed, and those working through a company, to raise revenue to invest in public services, and to ensure that support for investors is more effectively targeted'.

Announcing the changes, chancellor Philip Hammond said: 'The gap in total tax and NICs between an employed worker and one who has set up his own company will normally be greater even than the gap with the self-employed, and there are several perfectly legal ways in which that gap can be made bigger still.

'This is not fair. And it’s not affordable.'

James Gransby, head of healthcare at MHA MacIntyre Hudson and executive board member of the Association of independent specialist medical accountants (AISMA), said: 'For Locum GPs the fall in the tax free dividend allowance from £5,000 to £2,000 per year from April 2018 will be a blow for those operating through a limited company and follows hot on the heels of a 7.5% increase to dividend rates that they are already reeling from.

'The tax cost of this change for a husband and wife owning shares in a limited company who are both higher rate taxpayers will be £1,950 per year, and more for additional rate taxpayers.'

But AISMA committee member Luke Bennett, of Francis Clark LLP, said: 'Reduction of dividend allowance will reduce the tax incentive to form new companies, but I doubt it's enough to cause existing companies to be wound up.'

The news comes as Pulse reported earlier this week that GP practices could have to pay locum tax and NIC under new legislation - which accountants warned could lead to GP practices having to pay higher rates to locums.

Under new 'IR35' legislation coming in next month, any company which pays contractors through a company - including GP practices using locums - will need to check in each instance if they are liable for paying tax and NIC at source.

Readers' comments (6)

  • One more reason to Leave the sinking boat

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a result of this my fees are going up by 15% and I'm more committed than ever to leave the NHS. Never thought I'd say that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • absolutely awful.looking through the various contractor websites it would appear that public authorities like TfL etc have imposed a default ban on individuals working through pvt ltd companies to avoid being caught by IR35.others like the MOD have adv contractors to hike rates by 20% to ensure their projects dont fall through from contractors leaving en masse in protest.The NHS trusts here in the NW have adv agencies that they willnot employ any individual paid through a PSC.undoubtedly GP practices will follow suit.all locums will be forced to work as sole traders or via umbreall companies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Yes my rates will be going up to reflect not only this but the indemnity repayments that GP practices will be getting which, no doubt, they will be willing to share with their locums.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i do locum. i have cancelled my sessions today

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good to see Cobblers @1045am is keen to share in the money as yet not recieved by gp practices to fund extra indemnity. By charging and working as a locum he wants to share in additional payment but clearly may not be keen to recognise the overall profits are going down so wont want to share in that. Sure he finds time to see patients between counting his gold but this sort of behaviour doesnt bode well for our profession

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say