Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Practice list size grows by 25% in some regions causing 'crisis areas'

Exclusive An increase in average practice list sizes of up to 25% are creating ‘crisis areas’ in some parts of the country, a Pulse analysis of official figures has revealed.

An analysis of the latest Health and Social Care Information Centre figures on population sizes has revealed that the average list size grew by 197 patients - almost 3% - from April 2014 to April 2015, because of an increase in the total number of patients and a decrease in the number of practices.

This comes as Pulse has reported that practices have been struggling from the influx of new patients, with NHS England slapping a breach notice on one practice that tried to informally close their list, while practices in one area of England were given £25 for each patient they talk on after a neighbouring practice closed.

Pulse’s analysis reveals that in one CCG area - NHS Rushcliffe CCG - average practice lists increased by 2,098 patients, or 25.6%.

Meanwhile in the NHS Vale of York CCG area, average lists rose by 1,198 patients – 11.4% - and average lists in the NHS Aylesbury Vale CCG region climbed by 1,189 (12.3%).

The figures showed that the total number of practices in 2014 was 7,955, which decreased to 7,818 in 2015.

Although some of this has been down to mergers, it also demonstrates the strain being placed on practices due to neighbouring closures, which local leaders have said is creating ‘crisis areas’.

Pulse has previously revealed that there have been more than 160,000 patients displaced from their practice as a result of closures over the two years from April 2013 to April 2015.

Dr Paul Roblin, chief executive of Berks, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire LMCs – which covers NHS Aylesbury Vale CCG - said that that a growing population, coupled with practice closures, is pushing up list sizes.

He said: ‘We are experiencing population growth in some areas like Bicester where there are new housing developments and there have been a small number of contract hand-backs.’

‘A smaller number of surgeries, at a time when the population is increasing, will mean that average list sizes will go up. There are a few crisis areas on my patch, for instance in one location two small surgeries might go under. That will inevitably put pressure on the remaining practices.’

Dr Tracey Vell, honorary secretary at Manchester LMC, said: ‘We are working on ways to cope with increasing list size, which is also affected by retirement and practice closures.’

Dr Hadrian Moss - a Pulse blogger - was hit with a breach notice after following BMA advice and informally closing his practice list having been unable to recruit a partner.

A spokesperson for NHS Aylesbury Vale CCG said that ‘over the period in question, two pairs of practices merged – so four effectively became two – but neither has seen any dramatic increase in list size.’

Robert Taylor, head of outcome & information for NHS Rushcliffe CCG, said: ‘The CCG data clearly shows that two factors have occurred during the study period. The first factor is that the number of patients registered with Rushcliffe practices has increased by 0.53% from 122,919 patients in March 2014 to 123,576 in March 2015.

‘The second factor is that four practices within West Bridgford have merged to form a larger practice.’

And a spokesperson for the NHS Vale of York CCG area said that recent practice mergers had reduced the CCG’s number of practices from 34 to 30. However, according to the CCG’s own figures, the total registered population for VoY has only increased by just over 1% in the past year, the spokesperson added.

Readers' comments (7)

  • Vinci Ho

    Editor
    £25 for each patient they take on(not talk on) after a neighbouring practice closed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When will we be balloted gpc?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • this total erosion of service must stop. we have had years of words from GPC. action is needed to stop this Government forcing us out of buisiness with unilateral contract/PMS reviews. ballot us now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Many practices have patients from outside their area, they should be removed to allow those within the area to register.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Imagine a Contract that forces you to work unsafely, with you taking the legal consequences of such dangerous workloads. This cannot be right at any time, anywhere. Imagine an imposed Contract - there is no such thing, except in GPland - all Contracts are just that - agreed between 2 or more parties.
    What we have is an imposed diktat and an Union that is worse than useless. Does FIFA spring to mind? Otherwise - ballot for mass resignation. This Contract is impossible - ask Peverley- ask 1000s of others, except GPC.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our list has continued to grow rapidly over the last two years. It works out at 1 new patient for every working day. It took 2 years and 1 appeal to get our boundary reduced so we had a degree of control of where patients were coming from. Our list is set to increase still further due to local house building. We are now actively removing patients from our list where proof exists that they no longer reside within our boundary. We have increased our staffing at all levels Reception, Practice Nursing through to a retained GP and yet we continue to struggle with the daily influx. We are a good practice in danger of being over whelmed by patient demand and lack of support.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • mr hunt and the daily hate mail would disagree, saying we are all lazy , over paid useless and a waste of rescources

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.