Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

'Primary care hubs' among plans to receive share of £325m funding

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt has today announced £325m of funding for local NHS 'transformation plans', including millions for new 'primary care hubs'.

The funding will be handed to 15 of the ‘the strongest and most advanced' Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs) across England, to support a total of 25 local projects.

The largest sums of money will be given to Greater Manchester, Dorset and Cumbria, while five projects including GP services have been chosen for funding.

The projects include:

  • Bedfordshire: £5m to develop a primary care hub at Bedfordshire Hospital.
  • Derbyshire: £10-30m to build an area within Royal Derby Hospital housing GP services, out of hours and mental health assessment services.
  • Suffolk and North East Essex, North Clacton: Up to £5m for a new primary care hub, which will house three GP practices, community services and new renal dialysis unit.
  • West Suffolk: Up to £5m to fund the relocation of Oakfield GP surgery into Newmarket Community Hospital.
  • West, North and East Cumbria: £5m to develop eight community hubs offering GPs, social care, community services, mental health services and specialist hospital consultants.

Mr Hunt said the money, earmarked for STPs as part of the Spring Budget, ‘will support strong local plans to help the NHS modernise and transform care for patients’. 

He said in a written statement to Parliament that the schemes that received funding were ‘judged’ by NHS England to be ‘sufficiently advanced’ to progress.

Simon Stevens, NHS England's chief executive, said the plans would improve access to general practice.

He said: ‘For patients it’ll mean easier GP appointments, modern A&Es, and better cancer and mental health care.

‘For staff, we’re putting our money where our mouth is in backing these practical plans developed by doctors, nurses and local NHS leaders.’

But Dr Richard Vautrey, chair of the BMA’s GP committee, said that while the funding is ‘really important’, the schemes ‘won’t see the necessary recurrent funding’ to stay sustainable.

He said: ‘There’s no guarantee that funding will continue in the same way going forward and then other areas that are doing similar projects don’t get that equivalent level of funding because they’re not part of the favoured group that are being prioritised.

‘For general practice as a whole to develop, we need sustainable recurrent funding, not simple, headline-grabbing pots of money which don’t last very long.’

The full list of schemes to receive funding are:

  • Greater Manchester
  • Lancashire and South Cumbria
  • Dorset
  • Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
  • Milton Keynes, Bedfordshire and Luton
  • Derbyshire
  • West, North and East Cumbria
  • Nottinghamshire
  • Suffolk and North East Essex
  • Herefordshire and Worcestershire
  • South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw
  • Mid and South Essex
  • Norfolk and Waveney
  • Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West
  • North East London

A full list of plans is available here.

Readers' comments (4)

  • Cobblers

    Download the list of plans and cast an eye.

    Almost exclusively secondary care services, catheter labs, stroke services, renal dialysis, mental care.

    Don't get me wrong the secondary care sector is starved of funds. However it'll be no help whatsoever if Primary Care fails. And there is precious little money in this package for Primary Care.

    What is needed in GP is root and branch reform. Proper and adequate payment system, proper definition of workload and making the job fun again, losing the blood sucking vampires such as the CQC.

    So no cheers and certainly no cigar for this particular announcement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    The question is :
    Are these schemes significantly reducing the number of GP referrals to secondary care(if the boundary is still being defined) and time waiting to see specialists as far as patients are concerned. One can argue qualities like cancer survivals are easily subjects under the microscope for the telos of these schemes.
    Of course, consistent flow of resources (money , manpower , expertise and time ) is not seen to be guaranteed. Not to fool any layman, it is not going to be 'cheap' to start with , hence , a downpayment investment is really the right terminology.
    Another interesting aspect is whether indemnities of GPs are fully covered.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Garee all bar 2 is for secondary care although small amounts are in some for GP care - but not core GP

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Healthy Cynic

    He said: ‘For patients it’ll mean easier GP appointments, modern A&Es, and better cancer and mental health care.

    Really????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say