This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Rescue bid for struggling practices - too little, too late?

NHS bosses have finally woken up to the growing closure crisis, but are they doing enough, asks Alex Matthews-King

mission implausable image 3x2

Two years ago, bosses at NHS England were completely unconcerned about possible practice closures. They told Pulse closures happen ‘all the time’ and were nothing to be worried about.

They are not so relaxed any more.

Managers have been spurred into action after a spate of large closures around the country has destabilised neighbouring practices and thrown the plight of many into sharp relief.

LMC leaders have been warning for years that practices have reached a tipping point, but a Pulse investigation reveals surgery closures have hit a three-year high, with more than 200,000 patients displaced last year. And many others are nearing the brink.

After a year and a half of Pulse lobbying for decisive action, through its Stop Practice Closures campaign, NHS England has finally launched an initiative to support struggling practices.

But the £10m scheme is just a small one-year pilot targeting around 600 of the most vulnerable practices, and GP leaders are warning that it is much too little, too late to reverse the damage being done to general practice.

The pilot aims to parachute rescue teams into at-risk surgeries, offering specialist help with staff, finances and IT. Area teams have been told to come up with lists of practices in trouble, which were due to be submitted by the end of last month. Pulse has learned that in the South-West of England, the area team has identified 17 vulnerable practices covering around 100,000 patients.

If this is replicated across the country then around 620 practices could be in line for extra NHS support worth approximately £16,000 each (enough for a month’s worth of locum cover).

In the devolved nations too, health ministers are realising the extent of the problems in general practice. In Scotland, ministers have committed £60m over three years for practices facing ‘challenges’. In Wales, where several large practices have closed and 10 practices covering 50,000 patients have fallen under health board control, the Government runs a scheme that allows vulnerable practices to apply for support that could include funding, more training or additional staff, such as a practice nurse.

But in England, the situation has been made worse by the time it has taken NHS leaders to acknowledge the true scale of the problem.

Sudden move

Despite NHS chief executive Simon Stevens’ personal stake in expanding general practice – through the ‘new models of care’ in his Five Year Forward View – executives have been slow to develop any scheme to support struggling practices.

The £10m fund for vulnerable practices in England was announced as part of health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s ‘new deal’ last July.

But it was six months before area teams were told to come up with a plan to ensure the ‘sustainability and quality’ of general practice. Guidance issued last December to all CCGs and local area teams says this must address ‘workforce and workload issues’ in general practice in 2016/17.

All regions were tasked to draw up lists of their most vulnerable practices over Christmas using an NHS England ‘vulnerability risk matrix’ and submit them by last week. Practices were scored using measures such as the number of patients per GP, CQC ratings, QOF achievement and the number of sessions not routinely filled.

Pulse understands from instructions sent to area teams that practices that qualify will receive ‘externally facilitated provider support’ designed to build ‘longer-term resilience rather than deliver short-term quick fixes’. This could include financial incentives to help them retain GPs near retirement or adapt clinical roles to allow GPs to spend more time with complex patients.

The details are still being finalised, but it appears NHS England is using as a model a small scheme that began in the South region last July. This scheme appointed 21 organisations, including superpractices, foundation trusts and three private companies – among them corporate giant Virgin Care – to assist struggling practices.

practice closure graph 580x518px

practice closure graph 580x518px

Tipping point

But GP leaders warn many practices have shifted into the ‘vulnerable’ category over the past year, due to ongoing funding cuts, and workload and recruitment problems. Pulse has learned a number of practices are intending to hand back their contracts in April, including two practices with in excess of 10,000 patients hit by PMS funding cuts.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul tells Pulse the £10m fund is ‘far too low’. He adds: ‘It’s only going to be targeted at a small number of the worst-affected practices, while ignoring the iceberg underneath – the large number of practices reaching their tipping point.

‘What we really need is proper resourcing if we’re not to continue seeing more and more practices becoming unsustainable.’

Dr Nagpaul says he has advised NHS England that there should be funding for ‘resilience teams of GPs, practice managers and nurses’ to support practices going through difficulties.

He adds: ‘We shouldn’t be waiting for a crisis, we should be trying to prevent it and that needs much more than £10m.’

The NHS England scheme expects practices that receive support to contribute matched funding on a 50:50 bases as a ‘measure of their commitment to improvement’ – a stipulation GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey describes as a ‘big issue’ for the effectiveness of the scheme.

Dr Vautrey says: ‘Even if you were to identify practices that might benefit from support, would they be willing to accept that, bearing in mind they’d have to find 50% of the funding? That has to be recognised as a big constraint in being able to support the right practices.’

Many practices may be unaware that they will qualify for additional funding. The Victoria Park Practice in Bridgwater, Somerset, is on the risk list, but had no idea of this until contacted by Pulse.

Practice manager Paul Cawkwell says: ‘We are in one of the most deprived areas of the country and our PMS premium funding used to pay for an extra doctor. NHS England is not doing anything to sustain us; they are taking money off us.’

In some areas NHS managers have asked practices to apply for the funding, but with a challenging timeline. Nottingham GP Dr Hussain Gandhi says his practice heard about the scheme just days before the deadline: ‘We were contacted about the scheme, but receiving the information just a few days before the deadline meant applications were rushed.’

Many LMCs have not been consulted about the scheme and have little idea about which practices will benefit. But Dr Peter Graves, chief executive of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire LMCs, tells Pulse he has been able to work with the area team to push forward incentives the LMC has developed to get retired GPs back into practices and a diagnostic tool to enable early identification of struggling practices so they can be assessed and given appropriate support.

But Dr Graves is not convinced £10m will in itself make much difference: ‘I honestly don’t believe pumping a bit of money into one particularly vulnerable practice is going to have a long-term effect. Potentially it will just stave off the moment of truth and cause a bigger impact on local practices when that moment comes.

‘We’re trying to make sure this money is being utilised in a way which is more sustainable.’

Many practices in trouble will hope he and others succeed.

mission implausable map 780x980px

mission implausable map 780x980px

Rate this article  (3.75 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (10)

  • It is sad to see so many people struggling.
    GPs who are committed are burnt out.
    Practice managers who are the entenal optimists have nothing left and are leaving. Patients in the end suffer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We are vulnerable practice- as dependent on locums. So any of Mr Hunt 'support' is eaten up on locum costs. So now is the best time to give up partnerships and just do locums.

    Another crazy idea from Mr Hunt to use a sticking plaster to revive General Practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It really reflects on the GPC that doctors seeing 40+ patients a day are struggling to make ends meet. What does that say about funding per patient/ per consult. Average take home pay per consultation is 3 pounds [ factor in paper work, deductions for tax]
    Some in NI only make 2 pounds 20 pence.
    Rhetoric is fine from GPC, but real doctors in real surgeries are collapsing under your watch, Chaand and Vautrey.
    Fine words, but doctors seeing 40+ patient a day in some western countries would be earning 300000 pounds a year.
    Here, they are going under while GPC gives them 6 months more to come up with a package.
    Do penance, Mr Hunt said, and the GPC went and did.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Heard from a practice nearby today who made a £4k loss this year. 4300 patients soon to be missing a practice.

    It's done folks.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • `Rescue Squads` made up of NHS bureaucrats or from large Corporations will be useless. NHS bureaucrats doing the bidding of politicians of all colours have precipitated this unholy mess and large Healthcare organisations have no expertise in how independent contractors work. It`s also time for qualified professional Practice Managers to be recognised for their expertise and supported to bring practices back into efficient shape- and GPs to realise that MB BS etc are not management degrees. General Practice is nearly 70yrs old in its` present form and cannot be allowed to continue as it has always been in this modern world.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not heard of any such scheme in Kent and Medway - or are we on another planet?
    Our region was always the most translucent one and evidently it is keeping up to it's notorious reputation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear. The usual British mentality of throwing a few pennies at the plebs to try and placate them. Poor practitioners and patients alike.

    You just don't get it do you ?? The elite landed gentry type that have always ruled the country don't really care if you sink or swim. To them you are just useless eaters. Now when the elite had colonies to loot you all lived rather well and were able to modernise. Unfortunately now colonialism is a thing of the past and neo feudalism is in vogue. Instead of pillaging far away lands the establishment will "commandeer" resources from the middle class and lower classes. And still you refuse to see what's in front of you. Longer working lives and diminishing pensions, higher taxes, the removal of infrastructure already paid for such as schools and hospitals, railways etc all in the name of austerity ( translate this into paying the corporate kings so that they can enjoy luxury trips to Davos and bumper bonuses)!! Then they bring in more outsiders from overseas lands to lower your living standards by reducing your wages and what do you do?? You write a little letter to your dear leader!!

    Come on folks for goodness sakes wake up.

    Ditch the country comrades!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do doctors who work 12 to 14 hour days need a bailout? Why do so may practices need a bail out.
    It is not right that doctors working so hard in one of the richest countries in the world need bailouts. The system is wrong and needs re-set.
    Like the motto of the musketeers of All for one, it is time to leave this NHS GP land. We can charge, like dentists do, and then see if any GP seeing 49 patients a day needs bailed out.
    As more and more wags say - it is time to ditch the Contract.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a pathetic scheme! Far too little, too late.
    About time GPs united with the junior doctors. Their energy and commitment to patients, the future of the NHS and the wellbeing of all NHS staff is inspiring.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All part of Jeremy's plan.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say