Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Train non-medical staff to solve GP workforce crisis, employers told

Training non-medical staff to do the work of doctors could be a ‘rapid solution’ for the workforce crisis, a report commissioned by NHS Employers has suggested.

The Nuffield Trust report, published today, calls for the Health Education England budget to be protected, and for increased training for existing NHS staff in non-medical roles, citing this as ’a cost-effective and rapid solution to mitigating some of the pressures on more senior staff.’

Quoting a study estimating that up to 70% of a GPs’ workload could be taken on by other healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists, the think-tank predicts that in future ’care will be supplied predominantly by non-medical staff’ with patients ‘playing a much more active role in their own care’.

The report also supports NHS England’s plan to introduce more physician associates to take on GP workload, saying that ’the training provides a relatively rapid route into the NHS for graduates keen to undertake a clinical role and opens up a new workforce pool to the NHS’.

But, citing Pulse’s article from last month which reported that only six physician associates have been recruited to general practice, it admits that numbers will be small in the immediate future.

The Nuffield Trust also points out that ’the [PA] role requires an extended period of supervision before its full benefits are realised’ and that their impact on GP workload will be ’limited by the lack of a regulatory framework, which prevents physician associates from prescribing and ordering tests’.

The report further highlights the issues with medical indemnity for existing and new roles working in general practice.

It said: ’The Department of Health should expedite a review into the current legal indemnity arrangements for staff in primary care with new and extended roles.’

Quoting Health Education England’s GP director for Yorkshire and Humber Mark Purvis, the report highlights the scale of recruitment problems in general practice.

He says: ’I’ve got parts of Yorkshire and Humber where I can’t get many GPs and, unless I’m going to deliver care from an empty chair, I’ve got to deliver care from a chair with somebody different in it.’

NHS Employers chief executive Danny Mortimer said it would ‘take forward the learning and recommendations in the report’, but BMA chair Dr Mark Porter warned that training non-medical staff must not come ‘at the expense of good quality training for doctors or indeed doctors themselves’.

Dr Porter said: ’It takes doctors many years to learn how to provide the best care for their patients, and there is no substitute for this kind of expertise and experience.’

Patient Association chief executive Katherine Murphy also warned against trying to find ‘quick fixes’ to the workforce problem.

She said: ’The proposed new roles and extra responsibilities for existing staff should not be adopted as a “quick fix” solution to the complex staffing problems within the NHS, nor be seen as a cheaper alternative to highly qualified staff.

’These proposals will not solve the shortage of skilled doctors and nurses across the health service and should not aim to do so. Instead, the government needs to do more to invest in the training and retaining of these qualified practitioners.’

The General Practice Forward View, published last month by NHS England, ring-fenced spending for training of receptionists and practice managers to reduce GP workload, and also expanded on the existing scheme to make clinical pharmacists available to practices.

 

Readers' comments (20)

  • Wil E Coyote starts running frantically in mid air before plunging into the canyon. Get the picture ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bla bla bla,bla bla, blaaaaaaaa

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What would make GP land attractive to a PA, nurse....? The area is not 'sexy' enough. We can't get nurses or nurse practitioners at the moment. None are training up to work in primary care any more. Why would more want to come into this hell hole?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Someboy somewhere is thinking -- Damn!! Why didnt I think of this brilliant idea before!!

    We could have saved the NHS billion of pounds by cutting out the doctors from the scene!!

    And the doctors could have saved themselves all the unnecessary hardships they went through with all the training in med school!!

    Brilliant Idea!!

    Go for it Hunt!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS to be: free at the point of use, cheap care delivered by noctors for the masses.

    Anyone with money will see a doctor via private insurance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And who's going to pay for the indemnity, and who's going to take the rap when the inevitable happens?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • After all it works so well with the 111 service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If others already in the health and social services actually did their jobs or stopped putting stupid plucked out of the air regulations on what they can and cannot do then I'd have a lot of 'free' time to see more or deal with things more appropriately. People other than trained doctors cannot do my job but I shouldn't be doing others work for them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh FFS. Evidence shows that a senior clinician saves cash because they get it right first time. STOP IT.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ 3:17

    Cutting, but absolutely accurate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.