Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Dr Maureen Baker: 'Burnham's proposal to bring back the 48-hour target for GPs is an ill-thought out, knee-jerk response'

The proposal to bring back the 48-hour target for GPs is an ill-thought out, knee-jerk response to a long-term problem - which is the profound crisis in the NHS caused by the chronic under-funding of general practice, writes RCGP chair Dr Maureen Baker.

Bringing back the 48-hour target for GP appointments will only make a bad situation worse by transferring more pressure onto general practice - at a time when it is in crisis - which could have a profound impact on the safety of patient care.

The crisis that we are currently facing in general practice is just as bad as that in A&E, and has been caused by the accelerating diversion of resources from general practice to hospitals.

This crisis has the potential to bring the whole health service to its knees.

GPs now conduct 90% of the NHS contacts for just 8.39% of the NHS budget - the lowest percentage share of the NHS budget for general practice on record.

Between 2005/06 and 2011/12 (the latest year for which figures are available) the overall NHS budget grew by 18% in real terms, but funding for general practice fell by 8.3% in real terms, despite a growing population and spiralling health costs. Overall, general practice has lost a cumulative figure of £10.2bn over the last eight years.

This slump in funding is making it more and more difficult for GPs to deliver the services they want to.

We understand that patients are frustrated because sometimes they cannot get an appointment to see their GP, and a number of them then turn up at A&E who could be dealt with in general practice, but demand for general practice is outstripping resource and this will only get worse unless something is done to stop the transfer of funding from general practice to hospitals.

Our members tell us that they are already stretched to their limits and struggling to provide safe care for their patients. According to a recent RCGP opinion poll, many GPs are routinely working 11 hour days with up to 60 patient contacts in a single day. Another College opinion poll showed that 71% of GPs expect waiting times to worsen over the next two years and practices tell us that they are shedding staff due to funding cuts.

In order to stop the rot, the UK’s governments need to invest 11% of the NHS budget in general practice by 2017.

This would enable us to provide more patient appointments, more flexible opening hours, and more services for patients in their communities. It would also allow GPs to come up with new ways of working to manage demand and help alleviate pressures in other parts of the NHS.

We always felt that the 48-hour target introduced by the previous Labour Government, whilst well intentioned, distorted the smooth-running of general practice. GP access is extremely important but if you prioritise that over everything else, other services suffer and patients often end up worse off.

Dr Maureen Baker is chair of the RCGP

Readers' comments (2)

  • well said Maureen. GPs are carrying the NHS on their shoulders, holding it's values and keeping patients' welfare as their focus while being bombarded with bureaucracy, severe cost cuts and an immense and spiraling workload. The government refuses to transfer any significant funds from secondary care despite the shift in workload, and is in denial about the workforce crisis. Yet politicians keep coming up with weird and wonderful ideas with complete disregard to all the above !! The NHS is reliant on the resilience of GPs and I hope the College will be able to get the message across to the DoH.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    Good on you Maureen. You and Claire have done a MUCH better job of standing up for GPs than the BMA ever did. Shame it is too late for me. (13 days and counting.)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say