This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

GPs to do reviews of severely frail in place of scrapped unplanned admissions DES

The new GP contract will see GPs create a risk register of their severely frail, older patients and ensure these patients have regular reviews, in place of previous obligations under the 'avoiding unplanned admissions' DES.

Although it does not provide monies attached to the work the GPC said this will involve less work for GPs than the previous, bureaucratic DES - and will not be paid by performance.

Announcing the new GP contract, the GPC said that withdrawal of the unpopular DES will see £157m ploughed back into the global sum.

Instead, it says GPs will be required to identify their over-65s who are severely frail and deliver annual reviews to include medication reviews and falls risk assessments.

Practices will also be obliged to encourage these patients to give their consent for enriched Summary Care Records (SCRs).

However, the GPC stressed that GPs will not be required to produce any additional reports or make claims for the work done – unlike with the current DES.

The GPC said this agreement ‘ensures that practices are empowered to apply their own clinical judgement in the management of severely frail patients, as part of good clinical care, thereby ending the significant associated bureaucratic burden on practices under the current enhanced service’.

It added that the ‘percentage of patients with severe frailty is estimated to be significantly smaller cohort than that of the enhanced service’.

NHS England will collect GP practice data on this work – the number of patients recorded with moderate and severe frailty and the number of severely frail patients recorded with a fall in the past 12 months, and giving explicit consent to activate their enriched SCR – through automated extraction.

The GPC also stressed none of this would be used for performance management purposes.

What GPs are contracted to do instead of the avoiding unplanned admissions DES

Wth the unplanned admissions DES withdrawn, £156.7m goes back into global sum. Instead there will be a contractual duty to focus on the management of patients with severe frailty, and:

  • Use 'appropriate tool' to identify over-65s who are severely frail, and deliver a clinical review, including annual medication review and also falls risk assessment, other interventions as clinically appropriate 
  • Where these patients do not yet have an enriched SCR, seek their consent to activate  
  • However, there will no additional reports or claims to make for payment, unlike under the current DES.

NHS England will collect data through automated extractions - however GPC said this will NOT be performance managed


Related images

  • elderly - care - patient - palliative - care home - old - carer -online

Readers' comments (6)

  • National Hopeless Service

    Are you really sure there will be no boxes to tick?????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doesn't sound like a reduction in workload

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So who was responsible for the Unplanned admissions DES? Who exactly? Can anyone drill down and find out? Because these people seem completely unaccountable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic. Where is the workload reduction?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No filling in pointless lists every few months. No reviewing discharges to fill out more firms to assess whether it was an acceptable admission. Sounds like a reduction to me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This sounds like an order of magnitude increase in work to me. I work in a South Coast elderly retirement town. I have around 200 extremely frail on my personal list. I had around 25 patients on the unplanned admissions register. Great news for the university practices! That's 200 at any point in time, more like 250 over the course of the year because of the churn-over. That's hundreds more annual reviews, weeks of additional work

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say