This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

NHS England to save £200m on 17 'ineffective' procedures including tonsillectomy

NHS England has announced plans to scrap four surgical procedures, with a further 13 to be commissioned 'when certain criteria are met'.

The plans, laid out in NHS England board papers, are expected to save £203.3m in 2019/20.

However, the chair of the BMA said the latest development is a 'a tough pill to swallow' after the Prime Minister announced an extra £20bn for the NHS over the next five years.

He added that the extra investment 'should allow patients to get the care they expect from the NHS, and allow doctors to provide the care they need, not ration it'.

This first phase of the programme will see procedures such as tonsillectomy and carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery rationed, while surgery for snoring will also be cut.

The board papers said NHS England will be consulting on the proposals between 4 July and 28 September, but added that it intends to make this a ‘much wider, on-going programme’ with specialised services included in phase two.

The 17 procedures that will be consulted on in the first phase of this scheme have been based on clinical evidence and research from NICE, the Choosing Wisely recommendations made by the Royal Colleges and NHS Clinical Commissioners’ work on Procedures of Limited Clinical Effectiveness, the papers said.

It said: We propose the programme has a tight initial focus on seventeen interventions where there is clinical consensus and evidence that they should either not be routinely commissioned or should only be commissioned when certain criteria are met.'

It added: ‘The main reason for introducing this programme is to prevent avoidable harm to patients and free up clinical time and capacity. This means reducing activity for these seventeen interventions.

‘Last year, based on an initial assessment, we estimate the seventeen interventions were performed 348,201 times, amounting to £439m spend, although this figure will be subject to further review.

‘We have modelled three illustrative scenarios of the potential reductions in activity we could expect to achieve. Our moderate estimate is a reduction of 168,005 procedures in 2019/20, amounting to £203.3m spend.’

The paper added: ‘We intend to make this a much wider, on-going programme, subject to making sufficient progress in the first phase. We will consult on further interventions in phase two, which will be launched in early 2019.

‘We will keep the list of interventions under periodic review as the evidence base grows in future years. Phase two will also include specialised services, which are commissioned by NHS England.’

However, BMA chair and GP Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: 'Doctors welcomed news of a long-term funding settlement for the NHS but this latest development will seem a tough pill to swallow.

'While it’s correct some surgical procedures are now shown to be clinically ineffective, the Prime Minister’s investment should allow patients to get the care they expect from the NHS, and allow doctors to provide the care they need, not ration it. The promised funding is well short of what’s needed to do this and far behind funding of comparable European economies.

'In a recent BMA survey, three quarters of doctors said that financial targets still override patient care, while the board agendas of NHS organisations across the UK remain obsessed with balancing unbalanceable books.

'Rather than cut services, the government's priority should be to stop the scandalous waste of billions of taxpayer money on the damaging NHS market in England, pointless fragmentation of NHS services and outsourcing deals that disrupt patient care.'

Last week the Royal Colleges, which includes the RCGP, urged patients to question their GP about the harms and benefits of tests and treatments they’re being prescribed, while also publishing a list of 50 procedures that they consider to have little value, adding to the 40 avoidable interventions that they published in 2016.

GPs in 32 CCGs in London were already set to face new restrictions in referring patients for surgery, including hip and knee replacements following a review of eight surgical procedures.

Meanwhile, the King's Fund warned last year that GPs may soon encounter higher levels of rationing of treatments available for patient referral

List of procedures in full:

Four interventions that should no longer be routinely commissioned

  • Surgery for snoring
  • Dilatation and curettage for heavy menstrual bleeding
  • Knee arthroscopies for osteoarthritis
  • Injections for non-specific back pain

13 procedures that will only to be offered when specific criteria are met:

  • Breast reduction
  • Removal of benign skin lesions
  • Grommets for Glue Ear
  • Tonsillectomy for sore throats
  • Haemorrhoid surgery
  • Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding
  • Chalazia (lesions on eyelids) removal
  • Removal of bone spurs for shoulder pain
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome release
  • Dupuytren's contracture release for tightening of fingers
  • Ganglion excision - removal of noncancerous lumps on the wrist or hand
  • Trigger finger release
  • Varicose vein surgery

Readers' comments (6)

  • What's new? Fake news, this idea has been round for years,
    . Not a chance to realise the projected savings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All this is not going to help. The one thing that will help is a 5-10 p charge on every medicine issued.
    We continue to have requests from Pharmacies for medication which has not been ordered by patients. Some of these have been stopped years ago, some were changed by hospitals and some are actually contraindicated or patients had had adverse effects. Pharmacies are paid per script and some of them emply apprentices for 3.50 an hour who just tick every med on the patient's history.
    When patients get these, the sensible one don't take them or question them. The still wiser, get in touch with the GP and highlight the mishap. Majority, however, just dump them along with a 100 other specifics already gathering dust in the cupboards. This majority is of those who get free meds due to one or other entitlement. The moment the penny charge comes into play, this majority will be galvanized into protesting against issue of unwanted meds because their pockets will be fingered.
    A token charge on scripts will provide more oxygen for the NHS than the 5p has begun to provide for our waters.
    Rest is futile exercise, so let the govt make some bold decisions.
    The only safeguard we need is that the next governments will not try to use this charge as a cash cow and keep upping it till patients can't afford medication.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tantalus

    PLCV list of 5 years ago.
    Most of us have had restrictions on this list for years.
    Nothing to see here.......move along

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • need 50 p per item on scripts. no exemptions, even elderly to pay. A bargain and would save lots of money, reduce clinical waste adn be more clinically safe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The surgeons will become deskilled and when these procedures are needed they would not have the experience plus it will not work. Bring in charges.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The thin end of the wedge, none of the 4 procedures are performed in any case for the indications listed.

    What should be made clear is whether the NHS constitution for a comprehensive service is being upheld?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say