This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

GPs asked to refer patients to food banks

GPs are being placed in an ‘impossible position’ by charities who require them to refer patients to food banks before they give them support, GP leaders say.

Pulse has learnt that practices are being asked to write recommendations for patients or assess their suitability to be referred to food banks, organisations that provided emergency food supplies for 346,992 people nationwide in 2012/13.

The issue was recently raised in a parliamentary debate, where one Conservative MP claimed that GPs were responsible for ensuring there was not a ‘culture of dependency’ on food banks.

But GPs have said that the additional responsibility puts them in a difficult situation with patients and that they are ill-equipped to know the social situation of their patients.

Dr Paul Moore, a GP in Newhaven, East Sussex, said he had been asked to write recommendations for patients seeking support from the ‘Food 4 Seahaven’ charity in his region.

He told Pulse: ‘My problem with it is, people ought to be able to get food in other ways than going to their doctor, it ought not to be an issue that you have to refer people for food. I expect people to be able to access their basic human rights in a civilised society through social support, rather than charitable giving.’

He added: ‘It’s not a job I resent for the sake of the patient, but I resent it for the sake of society, that we have that role, and that role is necessary.’

Dr Peter Swinyard, Chair of the Family Doctors association and a GP in Swindon told Pulse these protocols were putting doctors in an ‘impossible position’.

He said: ‘Who do you say “feed me” too, and who do you not? I don’t know what the food bank’s criteria are. I don’t know the social background of quite a few patients - I know most of my patients, because I’ve worked here for a long time – but there are people who are working in practices where they haven’t worked for a very long time.

‘How are they supposed to know whether someone is – what in Dickensian terms, you might call the “deserving poor” - and who’s basically a scrounger who’s just trying to a get a meal out of the system. I think that’s putting GPs in an impossible position.’

Alun Cairns, Conservative MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, raised the matter in a House of Commons debate on Wednesday, where said GP recommendations were essential to ensure that food banks ‘rightly limit the provision they make available’.

He said: ‘First, people must have a voucher that comes from recognised body such as the social services, a GP, or a women’s aid or drug support group. They rightly limit provision because they do not want to create that culture of dependency. They are about bringing those people back into the state support system and the charitable groups that need to address those problems.’

A spokesperson for the food bank charity Trussell Trust told Pulse that they system had been put in place to ensure people were ‘plugged in’ to official support networks to address the cause of their immediate crisis.

They added that individuals who presented at a food bank without a referral, may still receive a meal, but would have to consult with a suitable authority before they could collect food to take home.

Readers' comments (28)

  • My wife in conjunction with the Trussell trust has set up a foodbank. IT is the Dn's / social work woman's aid etc who usually refer people. They refer people who they think need the foodbank. A Gp is not usually the person who refers a patient though I think a GP should be able to refer a patient if he thinks the patient is starving. I would agree that the Gp should not be required to see a patient to tick some silly box to declare a patient worthy. That is a waste of our service. Remember a conservative Mp mentioned this- the same party who walked out of a parliamentary debate on foodbanks. A foodbank would not turn a patient away so I'm sorry to say it is better to refuse the request and send the patient to the foodbank anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "How sick and starving would they need to yet, before being worthy of your time, skills and years of training?"
    ---

    I think we're all getting a very good idea about the kind of person that is posting here. Apparently there are so many "freeloaders" (what a charming term he/she has used) that they want us to waste our time sorting these out (regardless of whether or not it's our job or whether we have a million other things to do), and yet they are incapable of spotting someone who is so 'sick and starving' that they need food provided to them. Wow.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yet another raise of expectation. Started as a useful resource, now cannot delivewr so wants someone to take the blame.
    I have a medical degree- I will carry out my work in a professional manner.
    Tell social services to assess and decide who needs what. It is likley that the needy are already on Social service radar.
    I have no problem writing a proforma letter of referral for appropriate assessment by the specialist professionals .
    Not sure how they will take it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a very poorly written and misinformed article. Some clarification:

    1. Every Foodbank who joins The Trussell Trust is named after the town or community: Hammersmith & Fulham Foodbank, Central Liverpool Foodbank, Coventry Foodbank etc. Food 4 Seahaven, therefore, is not part of The Trussell Trust and they should not be blamed for a national situation that is thoroughly unquantifiable and based on a "food bank" that is not part of their network.
    2. The Trussell Trust position allows GP's who wish to refer to Foodbanks to sign up as referring agents but they are not forced to do so and if they did, they would be referring on health grounds and not on the basis of a full awareness of the financial circumstances of the individual.
    3. There is no quantifiable evidence of Foodbanks run in partnership with The Trussell Trust signposting, as has been implied, droves of hungry people to GP's only to subsequently be referred straight back to the Foodbank. There would be several very high profile human rights cases currently taking place and media article to boot if that were the case.
    4. One of the major reasons GP's have started to sign up is simply because over the last three years the numbers of people presenting as starved or malnourished is increasing at a significant rate. The ability to refer to a Foodbank on the basis of poor physical health offers another option for a GP to ensure the individual is receiving an ongoing source of support.

    It would serve us all well if the author of this article educated themselves before criticising an organisation who are not responsible for what is alluded to.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sam Spruce

    The very fact of this discussion indicates the appalling state of British society. There is no 'austerity' other than that created by the government in collusion with the banks and other major corporations. This situation should not be allowed to exist in Britain so the question is why are we having a discussion about who should authorise the use of food banks? They shouldn't be needed in the first place. The medical profession should take a much stronger stand against this government than they have done so far.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Should it not be the work and actions of a MP to ensutre that people in their constituency are not suffering lack of food? As a group they are responsible for the nation's nutritional state. Social problems are a a partional responsibility to the GP if it involves neglect or lack of primary needs. I do not think that we are responsible for the bad choices that our patients sometimes make.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The root problem, as the Government rightly emphases, is the culture of dependency. People must be helped to become less dependent on food. Evidence-based dependency reduction programmes should be developed, available on referral from a GP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well I think that this article is a bit inflammatory. Foodbanks are voluntary organisations - they are ASKING not REQUIRING GPs to refer people to Foodbanks. We did a review of Foodbanks in Sheffield which is available here. (http://localdemocracyandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/dp14366-food-report-new.pdf) Foodbank volunteers are generally quite clear - it is not for them to make judgements about who should or should not get short term support from food banks. They need professional agencies who are involved in the caring profession (I thought that GPs would include themselves in this) to help them. Most food banks are very clear that their existence and growth are a deeply regrettable by product of current government policy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say