Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

MPs slam Government's 'seriously flawed' seven-day workforce assumptions

There has been ‘no coherent attempt’ to assess the impact on the current NHS workforce of implementing seven-day services, MPs on an influential parliamentary committee has said.

A report by the Common’s Public Accounts Committee tasks the Department of Health with investigating and reporting on the ‘workforce implications’ of implementing the seven-day NHS by December 2016, adding that its current planning is ‘seriously flawed’.

It also highlights the lack of planning to ensure enough appropriate staff are on hand to deliver NHS England’s ambition of providing more care in the community.

The Government announced it had secured an additional £10 billion in NHS funding by 2020 from the Treasury in last year’s spending review to support its manifesto commitments, including the seven-day NHS.

But the PAC says it is ‘far from convinced’ that funding will be sufficient to meet all of its policy objectives, adding that the DH expects this ‘will cover everything – despite not having separately costed seven-day services and other initiatives’.

The PAC says that there has not been enough workforce planning to ensure that the Government’s policy decisions around providing more care in hopsitals and GP practices at weekends are achievable.

It states: ‘Limitations in the data on staffing pressures make it difficult for health bodies to make well-informed decisions about workforce planning.’

The PAC recommends: ‘The Department, working with its arm’s-length bodies, should set out how it will ensure there is systematic reliable data on workforce pressures, including vacancy rates and reasons why staff leave the NHS, to help them manage the supply of clinical staff more effectively.’

It also tasks the Government with ensuring that in future ‘major’ NHS policy initiatives ‘explicitly consider’ workforce implications.

A further recommendation calls for the DH to ensure it addresses the current gaps in workforce data, particularly around vacancy rates and reasons behind staff leaving.

Meg Hillier MP, chair of the PAC, said today: ’There are serious flaws in the Government’s approach to staffing the NHS and without urgent action the public will pay for it on multiple fronts.

'Taxpayers are being asked to accept uncosted plans for a 7-day NHS – plans which therefore present a further serious risk to public money.

'It beggars belief that such a major policy should be advanced with so flimsy a notion of how it will be funded – namely from money earmarked to cover all additional spending in the NHS to the end of the decade.’

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt is currently locked in a dispute with junior doctors after imposing a contract designed to increase staff presence in hospitals on weekends, while he said this week that he was pushing ahead with routine Sunday GP opening, despite a wealth of evidence showing little patient demand for the scheme.

Readers' comments (5)

  • When your own team say publicly that you live in a dream world, perhaps its time to LISTEN.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Reading this article was surreal! Those morons are supposed to be educated and intelligent yet they behave like brain-damaged selfish prats! God help us all!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP Sunday opening will be demanded by JH but not funded .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Basically every health care worker will get a 20 to 30% drop in income. In order to make this up workers will have to do 20 to 30% more hours/productivity. Or the money saved by those workers that are not prepared to do more work will be used to employ other workers. This is assuming that there will be enough workers available and willing to do this for the reduced income.

    Having seen the last Commons Health Select Committee meeting this week, it appears that hospitals are going to be starved of funds more than primary/community care. I am not sure how hospitals will reduce their costs or conversely increase productivity. Would hospitals/foundation trusts be allowed to shut without public consultation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is the most pathetically incompetent mendacious brutal and corrupt government since WW2 who serially lie and cheat to the electorate
    Not a shred of honour
    Not one

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.