Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Only three areas commit to funding seven-day GP services

Exclusive Sixteen of the 19 CCG areas taking part in the first wave of the Prime Minister’s seven-day GP access pilots have not committed to fund seven-day appointments beyond April 2016.

Just two CCGs areas across the 20 first-wave pilots have committed fully to continue funding their scheme past next March, a Pulse investigation has revealed.

Another former pilot - in east London - has agreed to continue seven-day routine GP access, but only for patients with five or more long-term conditions.

And another in Bristol and south Gloucestershire has had to reapply for central Government funding.

Across the other 15 areas, two CCGs have cancelled their schemes altogether. The remainder (13) said they are still evaluating findings of the pilot schemes run over the past year or are awaiting more clarity from Number 10 regarding the future funding of seven-day access, while two have said they have no current plans for long-term funding of seven-day routine GP appointments at all.

This strikes a blow to the Government, which had always claimed that the schemes would become self-sufficient from April 2016, once savings were realised from a reduction in A&E attendances.

It comes as the Treasury has said that the £750m committed to general practice would go towards seven-day access, after Prime Minister David Cameron had originally said the budget would be £400m.

The official evaluation into the PM’s Challenge Fund pilots found that there was a 15% reduction in the number of patients attending A&E with minor ailments across the pilot areas, compared with the national average of 7%.

However, it also found that these savings amounted to £3.2m across the wave one schemes - way below the £50m invested in the Challenge Fund, the majority of which went on providing seven-day services.

The evaluation also recommended Sunday opening is ditched due to a lack of demand, with the potential of commissioning extended evening opening or Saturday morning clinics.

seven day access map 580px wide v2

The Pulse investigation revealed that NHS Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG, and a scheme in the South West encompassing Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly have dropped Sunday access altogether and will not be funding it from April 2016.

The majority said they had not yet decided whether to continue funding it.

NHS Southwark CCG, which is one of the three that has committed to funding the services from April 2016, has commissioned 8am-8pm routine appointments on a hub basis for three years at a cost of £2m annually.

Even enthusiastic areas, such as Bury – which has been held up by the Department of Health as evidence of the scheme’s success – are unclear about whether they will pursue the scheme with a spokesperson telling Pulse the future funding of seven-day appointments was ‘uncertain’.

Dr Peter Thomas, organisational medical director for Bury GP Federation, said: ’Seven-day opening has worked very well for us in Bury. That said, discussions with commissioners are ongoing regarding the future model of extended access.’

 *This article was updated at 12:10pm, 25 November 2015, to state on the map that Southwark CCG will provide over 80,000 extra appointments a year, and not 800,000, as it previously said. 

Readers' comments (16)

  • This scheme never had any wheels. It was all up in the Air to start with. PM's PD. Pipe Dream

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ONE too many.
    outrageous and criminal waste of public money in context of a hugely underfunded health service now grossly failing on waiting times..and other metrics that are now causing great suffering.
    unconsciable.
    a profound disgrace from utterly ignorant totally out of touch delusional politicians.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • apologies.. THREE too many..but in fact even ONE is too many...you get my anger.
    for our administration which pisses away taxpayers nhs funds in every direction in its ignorant arrogance..this is small beer for their pantechnicon of waste..sadly.
    this government deserves to be liquidated.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ivan Benett

    7 day extended hours access is being rolled out in Greater Manchester. This will benefit those who can't get an appointment during normal working hours for same day need and long term conditions. It will help to reduce those inequalities in access for people who work or have carers who work. As well as reducing A&E attendances, once the service is embedded and there is full PrimaryCare provision (not just GPs) we can start to make an impact on admissions.
    Of course this means changes in working practices and culture. It will take time, more workforce capacity and changes in skill mix. We need to work in a much more integrated way with community services to move activity out of hospital.
    In the end it's the only way to invest in Primary Care.
    Sure we need to review demand at weekends (although most cynics were saying the extra capacity would just create unlimited demand!), but once the public get to realise that at weekends the service is open they will begin to use it more. This will in turn release capacity in-hours for those who value continuity of care. Everyones a winner. It is the future, so embrace it, don't resist it, notwithstanding some of the hyperbole in these comments, and the exaggerated headlines in the magazine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having read the latest outpouring from Dr Benett I have done everything I should do. I walked the dog, had a contemplative coffee watching the sun rise, a hot shower with some loud Mozart, and ten minutes meditation with the crossword. Yet still the most charitable thing I can say to him is this. You are wrong, very very wrong, and it's a good job I work a long way from Manchester in the twilight of my career. The Hutzpah of the man, this minority of one, who no doubt is on every Manchester GP's Christmas Card list, is astonishing. Less power to your elbow Ivan. I should imagine many younger colleagues imagine less temperate responses. Look forward to seeing you manning the braziers next week Ivan, or is the event a little "red" for you?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • B@llocks to extended opening.

    It will just service more undiscovered 'Want' not need.

    Just like patients already tour, A&E, OOH, after starting at walk in centres 1st, and then end up seeing me to actually sort out the problem!

    Alternatively they see me and get no antibiotics, and then trail through the other services until they find someone who has to cover their back and ends up giving it, again wasting valuable resources for the same minor ailment.

    This duplication of provision with often no actual benefit is wasting billions in a time of cuts to real services.

    Go back to need not want, and convenience is irrelevant, if unwell time off from work, is a right for all.

    Scrap the 7 day service and hire buses to ferry patients to GP appointments instead in routine hours, with extra funding to bolster in hours care, supporting those carers instead.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear All,
    As we are all scientists i hope that Dr Ivan Benett will one day in the future report back on the degree to which his beleif's have been fulfilled. In particular the concept that adding capacity satisfies demand. As examples the introduction on NHS Direct (original ministerial announcement was to "act as alternative to ccalling out the GP"), NHS 111, MIUs, GPs fronting A/Es, GP 8x8 7/7 servces.
    Regards
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    This ridiculous mismatch with healthcare needs and customer service style delivery assessments is politically driven disaster which the private sector are obsessed with.

    Even the private sector knows there is a limit to matching demand which outstrips costs entailed, leading to costs making extending services non-viable.

    DOH not spending own money but should still be held accountable to the public for burning essential funding for Core NHS services which are being cut.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Opportunity cost.

    This whole politically led scheme is no better than handing bundles of cash to a certain section of voters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • patients will turn up where the lights are on in an emergency
    Focus has to be
    prevention
    self care-patients served by a website and online help signposted to SPOA triaged and worried well minor self limiting illness managed out of the system-enabling not encouraging dependence-locally owned
    1' care focussing on management of long term conditions
    Service integration so access and capacity meet demands
    NO PROVIDER BARRIERS
    managing to make the money go further is not about pandering to political ideology

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.