Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Seven-day GP working shows 'significant' reductions in A&E attendances

Seven-day GP access pilots have brought significant reductions in the number of A&E attendances and admissions, but might be most effective in ‘strategically located surgeries’, researchers have claimed.

The study by the University of Sussex, published in the Journal of Health Economics, found that seven-day opening did little to divert A&E attendances for minor injuries, but it was effective for older patients and more affluent patients.

A&E attendances were reduced by 10% across the week among patients whose practice was piloting seven-day access, with reductions of 18% seen on Saturday and Sunday.

But GP leaders have called for caution in interpreting the study, which contrasts with others – including the Government’s own assessment – which found Sunday opening was less popular.

Researchers looked at 34 practices in central London, some of which have been piloting seven-day working since 2013 – before the national seven-day access pilots funded by the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund.

Pulse has revealed that a quarter of practices in the national Challenge Fund pilot have curtailed opening hours, or stopped all together, because of a lack of demand.

The access pilots were also meant to become self-funding by freeing up funding from more expensive hospital attendances, but NHS England has had to plough more money into schemes to keep them operating. 

And a further £500m was pledged to support the rollout of seven-day access in the GP Forward View.

The study states: ‘We found a large and statistically significant reduction of 9.9% in A&E attendances overall and 17.9% in weekend A&E attendances by the patients registered at the pilot practices.’

It found a similar drop of 10% in hospital admissions, which was ‘entirely concentrated among elderly patients (over 60 years of age).’

Researchers speculated that hospital consultants without access to the full record were more risk averse and likely to admit patients who GPs would monitor.

However, they also found patients in more affluent areas benefitted more.

It states: ‘While there are significant drops in all attendances and cases of moderate severity in counts of patients from the less wealthy neighbourhoods (below median price), there are large and additional drops in patients from wealthier neighbourhoods.’

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey warned that with practices under ‘incredible strain’ from rising patient demand and funding shortages, many were struggling to provide adequate access during the week.

He said: ‘This study needs to be taken alongside others which haven’t shown a significant reduction in hospital activity and it should also be noted that schemes such as this have only been possible through significant additional, short-term funding.

‘Many of the pilots have shown that appointments provided on a Sunday were not used by patients, wasting vital NHS resources. Current GP services badly need significant new funding to enable an immediate increase in staff to allow GPs to be able to meet the growing needs of their patients. This should be a priority before there can be any expansion in what practices already offer.’

Dr Vikram Pathania of Sussex’s School of Business, Management and Economics, who led the study, said: “There is clearly evidence of unmet demand for weekend GP opening.

’Seven-day opening for GPs appears to make a dent in two major sources of A&E expense – admissions and ambulance usage. The latter alone shows a significant drop of nearly 20% on weekends. Costs aside, there is also strong evidence that patient healthcare, in many cases, could be better delivered by a visit to a GP.’

J Health Econ, available online 17 June

Readers' comments (26)

  • Was there a control group of practices where the same amount of money was used to fund more week day appointments (perhaps even more than at the weekend as the cost would be lower!) or was this a comparison of no extra funding vs extra funding used inefficiently at the weekend?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PMCF and the 7 day access rhetoric is about routine appointment and there is a lack of demand for these.

    How many A&E attendances are prevented through routine appts and how much of it is down to access for care on the day?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pulse sending my blood pressure up again

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lies,damn lies and statistics

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Given the distortion of the stats re the "weekend effect" I would be interested in more than just headlines. I do note it is the affluent who benefit , would it have prevented Mr Hunt from taking his family to A&E?
    I assume that this is likely to be without extra funding just recycling and re-badging...the net result will be an increased exodus of GPs and poorer recruitment

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hopeless-Unintelligent-Nonsensical-Twit

    Watch this man - Mr Hunt - use this to for a 24hrs/7day - 365 days NHS GP services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where has the study been published?
    Was additional funding for 7day GP access to specific, presumably volunteering/self selected practices the *only* change?
    And has anyone looked at any reason why there appears to be a difference between this study and the several other studies showing little demand and no reduction in A&E attendances?
    I am curious why weekend GP access would reduce weekday A&E attendance during the week...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Journal of Health Economics, link now included. Thanks for pointing this out

  • Would anyone trust politically sensitive research without rigorous scrutiny after Hunts repeated lies

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There should be another study done that shows the actual link between cutting funding and increase in hospital admissions (a no brainer).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets face it, many patients CHOOSE to go to A&E due to lack of GP appointment. Also, society is becoming a 24/7 thing, like it or not. Its either yield to demand or charge per consultation and we all know this government is planning to do both. The NHS is dead, long live the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say