Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS managers unable to transfer practice contract for 'legal reasons'

Practices in a north London borough are being asked to take on thousands of patients because NHS England has been unable to transfer the contract of a closing practice for ‘legal reasons’.

The Bingfield Street surgery in Islington, run by Dr Hannah Flinders, is due to close on 29 May. She is understood to have been off work for nearly a year, but now wants to retire.

NHS England told Pulse that it has written to 13 neighbouring practices, as it has been unable to transfer the contract to neighbouring practices for ‘legal reasons’.

It did not state what these legal reasons were, but Pulse reported last year that NHS England was unable to hand out GMS or PMS contracts for GPs to take over the contracts of closing practices because of procurement regulations.

A spokesperson for NHS England (London) told Pulse that the sudden nature of the Bingfield closure was due to Dr Flinders ‘requesting a reduced notice period when she resigned from her contract’.

The spokesperson said: ‘We understand that some patients will be saddened to hear their practice is closing but for legal reasons we are not able to transfer the contract to another GP and keep the practice open.’

NHS England (London) has already written to patients to update them about the closure and have suggested that they choose to register at one of the 13 other GP practices nearby, which between them currently have space for around 14,000 additional patients in their catchment area.

Also in Islington, the Mitchison Road Surgery and its patient list will be handed over to NHS England at the end of July, after the three GPs that work at the practice resigned from their contract due to ‘pressures around the lease of premises, retention and recruitment of clinical staff, finances and workload’.

A spokesperson for NHS England (London) said: ‘No decision about the future of the practice will be taken until we have completed a thorough engagement process with patients and stakeholders. We want to hear patients’ views and held two meetings for those registered with the practice on the 23rd April 2015.’

Patients are expected to be informed about the outcome of the consultation by the middle of June. Although closure is one option, the practice could be saved if another organisation was brought in to run it from the current premises.

These are the latest in a long line of practices that have had to close.

As part of the Stop Practice Closures campaign, Pulse revealed that 78 premises had closed as a result of practice closures or mergers in two years.

Readers' comments (6)

  • It is a lack of goodwill and not 'procurement procedures' We go over and over in circles over this topic in the media. European procurement laws are a lame excuse to privatize NHS. Let's have one example of a procurement process' where a GMS Contract was given instead of APMS after duly advertising in the local regions. Contracts are being given to providers behind closed doors and only a handful of 'interested' parties are invited to these and having attended one farcical meeting, I think LMCs should vote for liquidation of NHSE. That won't happen because of a cosy relationship that is undermining and ruining GPS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In the 1970s and 80S we had a Family Practitioner Committee (FPC) run by an extremely able and sensible Chief Executive who was not only trusted by GPs but also held in very high regard. He would have sorted this out in 10 minutes.This demonstrates so clearly the retrograde steps that General Practice has been forced down. " A spokesperson for NHS England (London) said No decision about the future of the practice will be taken until we have completed a thorough engagement process with patients and stakeholders" - just really makes me want to throw up to be honest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How come NHS England could just hand out contracts to a local foundation trust in Chesterfield but not in this case.?double standards or using the rules to benefit their political agenda.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The inability to hand over the contract is down to the privatisation agenda.

    There are always loopholes to allow things to happen that go around 'legal reasons', and closed doors that stand between common sense and commercial deals that are happening under the table.

    GMS is being slowly choked to death, and even though it is a very slow creep, the change of attitude to 'legal reasons' for preventing new GMS contracts will lead to inevitable extinction in favour of private and soon to be large American multinationals entering the market.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PERSONALLY I NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD NHSE SAY..THEY HAVE A TRULY APPALLING DISINGENUOUS RECORD.
    TOTALLY UNFIT FOR PURPOSE .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Delegalize NHSE and all the 'legal reasons' will fade giving a new leash to general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.