Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Vulnerable practices 'to be allowed to fail and wither', says NHS England director

Exclusive A senior NHS England official has said vulnerable practices must ‘transform…or be allowed to fail and wither’, a leaked document obtained by Pulse and the BBC has revealed.

Paul Twomey, medical director of the Yorkshire and Humber area team, made the claim in a briefing sent to NHS managers and GP leaders in the region.

He said that NHS England is ‘no longer in a position’ to continue supporting vulnerable practices ‘irrespective of their willingness or ability’ to transform.

GP leaders said that NHS England were taking on ‘Orwellian tones’ with this latest statement.

NHS England has been urging practices to federate and merge, but this is the most explicit a medical director has been about allowing practices to fail.

It comes as Pulse has revealed that a £10 million fund to support vulnerable practices announced 14 months ago has had very little impact, with many area teams having failed to even identify the practices that will receive funding.

Pulse has revealed through its Stop Practice Closures campaign that practices are closing across the UK, and reported today that partners of a practice in Warwickshire are having to take out personal loans to pay for redundancies after the local CCG blocked its attempts to merge. 

Other notable recent practices in danger include an 18,000-patient practice in Oxfordshire, and another closing while it was waiting for vulnerable practice funding, while the local trust is taking temporary charge over four GP practices in Lincolnshire, and four practices in Brighton and Hove servicing over 10,000 patients had to close after funding was pulled through the review of PMS contract.

NHS England has previously said that practice closures are ‘not always a problem’ and ‘happen all the time’, and occur through mergers, new premises and death of a single-handed practitioner.

But the comments by Mr Twomey go further than this, indicating that NHS England would actually allow practices to fail.

In the briefing note, he wrote: ‘The message we need to communicate to general practice is the GP Practice Forward View must be about transformation and in that sense is not like a pilot.

‘This is what we do need to explore I think in particular with the LMCs, who on the whole across Yorkshire do have a commitment and focus of quality, and appreciate that vulnerable practices must either transform and deliver a quality service or be allowed to fail and wither by the system.

‘We are no longer in a position to continue supporting practices irrespective of their willingness or ability as a provider to transform appropriately.’

But GP leaders reacted angrily.

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said: ‘The term transformation seems to be taking on Orwellian tones when used in this way. There are many practices who were previously performing well and valued by their patients but are now vulnerable because of spiralling workload and recruitment problems beyond their control.

‘Such practices should not be written off. The whole basis of the practice resilience scheme is to provide appropriate support to practices and NHS England and CCGs should be trying to do all they can to utilise this resource.’

Dr Peter Swinyard, chair of the Family Doctor Association, said: ‘Starve the practices of resources. Micromanage them into the ground. Over inspect and over criticise. Then stamp on them.

‘It is hard to be transformative when you cannot recruit doctors or nurses and are under the cosh of all the stresses we know, then have your income and resources reduced making it even more likely that you cannot manage change and adapt.’

He added: ‘This is the most desperate and negative policy I have heard.’

Mr Twomey declined to comment, but an NHS England spokesperson said his comments ’do not reflect national policy whatsoever’.

Related images

  • Nhs england


Readers' comments (47)

  • so if that lot are not in a position to support practices, why are we still in a position to provide unfunded services?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Finally.
    Ministry of Plenty, of course is Orwellian.
    Like to listen to Auntie May's response to this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The implication that vulnerable practices are those that are 'below par' or that offer poor quality care is not true. Any practice can become vulnerable to closure as a result of illness, retirement or resignation. As workload spirals, it becomes increasingly impossible to attract or recruit replacements - who would choose to join a failing partnership? Training practices and practices formerly rated as 'good' or 'excellent' by the CQC can be just as vulnerable to a change in circumstances as any other practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nothing we didn't know already.

    Ditch the contract comrades.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear friends , surely no one is surprised...

    Wake up and smell the roses, our NHS is systematically being dismantled and will be offered to the likes of virgin health on a plate once the concept of at scale working within the public sector is firmly established. STP's are the vehicle being used to force us to engage with placed base care.. once placed base care entities have had some time to mature they'll be tendered off to the private sector. As STP's aren't a statutory body or indeed covered by any legislature they cannot be held to account- as a profession we need to take a stand to protect our NHS from this inevitable fate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    True face of NHSE
    For those who have been telling the truth ,nothing but the truth , are always condemned to be negative and not helping the situation . Oh dear, we and Pulse are so so guilty .......
    By the way , how much taxpayer money is used to pay these 'senior NHS officials'?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Practices fail. Surrounding practices are destroyed with a sudden increase pressure . The wave ripples outward and others collapse in its wake. Soon only a few desperate outposts remain which implode under the workload. The foundations are gone and the NHS goes with them. This is the plan . Pity they couldn't let the banks fail . All our money has gone to support those hunts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Tories have always hated the NHS . This is their revenge .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHSE thinks that GP at large scale is workable. It is NOT.

    It is difficult to do this even in hospital e.g. 'Any Gastroenterologist in a DGH, or increasingly across DGHs will see any new patient or follow up'. This means that all Gastroenterologists have to work with joint protocols, but vague GI symptoms do not fall into protocols and patients respond individually to different treatments and clinician 'styles'. At least the hospital Doctors get a lot more consultation time to do this for only 'one' disease area

    Now going back to GP at scale. We will need common protocols for ALL disease areas, not just one, as above. We will also need common patient access portals, one referral centre, one repeat medication centre, one centre for actioning letters and results, one centre for complaints. As to patients having any on going clinical relationship with a named clinician, dream on. And all in 10 minutes!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say