Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

HPV 'should be primary test' in cervical screening

By Emma Wilkinson

HPV testing offers longer-term protection from cervical cancer than cytology and should be the primary method of screening, a study has concluded.

Five-year follow up of screening in 11,000 women showed that CIN2 or higher grade lesions occurred in only 0.23% of women who tested HPV negative compared with 0.48% who had a negative cytology result.

The risks of CIN2 or higher 1, 3 and 8 years after a negative HPV test were found to be 0.09%, 0.12% and 0.61% compared with 0.21%, 0.28%, and 1.04% after a negative cytology result.

Study leader Professor Jack Cusick who runs the Cancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics at the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine in London, said the results provide additional support for using HPV as the primary screening test.

He added: ‘The very high sensitivity of HPV testing cannot only lead to a more effective screening programme but the resulting high negative predictive value can safely allow longer screening intervals and result in a more cost-effective programme as well.'

British Journal of Cancer, published online April 28

HPV testing offers longer-term protection from cervical cancer, compared with cytology

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say