This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

The docbot will see you now

CQC increases number of criminal actions against medical providers by over 30%

The CQC increased the number of enforcement actions it took last year in an effort to ‘protect’ the public.

In its latest annual report, the CQC said it had taken ‘decisive action’ this year to protect people by increasing the use of its ‘civil and criminal powers,’ issuing more civil and criminal actions and fewer warning notices in 2018/19.

Over the past year, it issued almost one third more (32.7%) criminal actions - which includes fixed penalty notices, prosecutions and simple cautions - against medical providers than in 2017/18 - 211 actions compared to 159 in the previous year.

It also enforced 1,089 warning notices in 2018/19 compared to 1,343 in 2017/18 and increased the number of civil actions by 16% to 906 actions this year.

The regulator acknowledged that while the public mostly believe it ’effectively’ inspects medical services, there was ’more to do to reassure the public’ of the work it does. 

The CQC document said: ‘While the majority (74%) of people in our 2018 public awareness survey told us that they trust CQC is on the side of people who use services, we have more to do to reassure the public about the work that we do, with 60% agreeing in the survey that CQC can effectively monitor, inspect and regulate the services that they use.’

It follows the BMA’s calls for a review of CQC processes which it said had been ‘causing stress’ and GP burnout. 

In total, the CQC issued 77 fewer actions this year, a total of 2,206 enforcement actions in 2018/19, but it said the increase in criminal actions taken was a ’continuing trend over the last two years.’

It added: ’Our case management tracking system is helping to strengthen our criminal action work.’

In response to the annual report, CQC chief executive Ian Trenholm said: ’The progress we have made in 2018/19 has been down to the hard work and commitment of the many people who work across this organisation. From the conversations I have day to day I am also absolutely clear that each and every person who works at CQC is committed to improving even further to ensure that more people are able to access high-quality care.

’At CQC we are ultimately accountable to people who use services. We want to make sure that we do all we can to protect people from poor care and encourage improvement, while offering value for money to providers, and being an efficient and effective regulator. In the past year we have made significant strides towards this, and we have a roadmap of activity to allow us to continue to improve.

‘This report is an opportunity to take stock of what has gone well, what could be done better, and to learn from it. We have embarked on an important programme to strengthen our digital capability and our organisational systems and processes to make it easier for us to do our jobs, easier for providers to work with us to do their jobs, and easier for the public to use what we know. These changes will not happen all at once – we will take an iterative approach, testing new and redesigned approaches to make sure that the ultimate outcome is more high-quality care for those who need it.’

Readers' comments (14)

  • There are only two words one needs to utter to a CQC goon: Whorlton Hall

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-48367071

    Who is going to take criminal action against the CQC over THEIR failings?

    Hypocrites

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Might also want to add Carl Beech as appears (according to BBC website) he worked for them inspecting hospitals too?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is part of the worrying trend of criminalisation medical staff that is being heavily promoted in the UK. No doubt it is very profitable but it adds very little to patient safety and is almost certainly harmful. As noted above, the CQC is very poor at preventing the outstandingly awful from happening, probably a byproduct of their 'tick the boxes and everything will be alright' culture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wow! Whorlton Hall and Carl Beech worked for the CQC. What happened to checking the credentials they are so hot on? It appears the CQC has lost the plot nit picking good surgeries not having a bin cover in their staff room and forgetting it is the big things that count. The criminalisation of staff is very worrying and makes things more dangerous for patients. Toxic UK. The system is over promising and bankrupt and in the process of going down, they are trying to pass the blame to medical staff. Leave if you can.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The goalposts have changed and rather than a pragmatic balanced look to see if a practice is safe and effective, we have moved towards a comparison with an impossible ideal standard which no practice can adhere too. There are fortunate practices getting outstanding by the cqc on any given day but scratch the surface and you will find issues which could result in them being adequate too and give current standards anyone can fall foul of the inspection regime.The solution is to reduce the daywork of seeing patients and provide a miminal actual service in order to spend time pandering to achieve the stupid standards, work within limits and not take on any work which is potentially unsafe especially non contractual work. Ifthe government realises that as a result of this we are unable to provide sufficient appointments and waiting lists rise to months with increase in Ed attendances and patients complaining of practices not offering some services, change might happen. Otherwise you could leave it to the BMA, listen to their waffle and see no change.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They take action when it suits them and discriminatingly nepotistic

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And Boris Johnson wonders how to sort out the three week wait to see a GP. Eventually the penny must drop that if you make the job impossible no one will do it ! It is so achingly screamingly obvious.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC have so much to answer for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Trust not regulation - try joining the modern world.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If CQC continues with this attitude of whipping very soon there would be no one fro them to whip. Then as experience and history suggests they can start whipping themselves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say