This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

GPs in England receive over 250,000 inappropriate NHS 111 referrals per month

GPs in England receive over a quarter of a million inappropriate referrals from NHS 111 every month, a Pulse survey has shown.

The survey of 616 GPs found that each family doctor received an average of 6.2 inappropriate referrals a month from NHS 111 - which equates to an overall estimated 278,051 unsuitable referrals, based on extrapolation using the total number of GPs in England.

Over 130 respondents said they had experienced more than 10 incorrect NHS 111 referrals a month at their practice, with GPs warning the service is 'a national disgrace' and could lead to patient harm. 

The BMA said the safety and efficacy of NHS 111 'should rightfully be questioned and scrutinised in depth'. 

But NHS England said the proportion of callers sent to primary care 'has fallen for each of the last five years' and that it carries out regular independent reviews of the service.

Since April, changes to the GP contract mean practices are being funded to ensure appointments are available for direct booking by NHS 111.

One GP who took part in Pulse's survey - and receives more than 10 inappropriate referrals per month - has warned the system could cause patient deaths.

They said: ‘They definitely cause deaths, but no one dares say a thing. Us GPs just talk about it quietly. We are justifiably scared of what will happen if we speak out, I have recent personal experience of this.’

The GP said they had seen women who were bleeding during early pregnancy being given out-of-hours appointments through the NHS 111 direct booking system.

'I tried to do something about the inappropriate booking of women in early pregnancy who were bleeding but being sent by 111 to GP out-of-hours settings - nowhere near a hospital - as I was clinical lead at the time. But it was impossible, despite several Datix incidences,' said the GP.

Datix is the incident reporting form used by healthcare professionals to report clinical incidences.

The same GP added: 'I know it's still going on, the current contract holders in [my area] are not the slightest bit interested.'

Another survey participant said: 'A patient with blurred vision was booked in for a 4pm appointment when they should have been sent to eye casualty.'

One GP said they received an inappropriate referral every shift, adding that 'the most common is patients being sent from an area that is 10 miles away as the crow flies but, due to a large bay, it's 40 miles minimum by car'.

NHS 111 call handlers are also misleading patients about how urgently they need to see a GP, according to another survey respondent, who also asked to remain anonymous.

They said: 'NHS 111 is the biggest national disgrace this country has had. Frequently call handlers will inappropriately send ambulances or worry patients needlessly by saying the person needs to contact primary care within one or two hours. It is so sad that call handlers with so little training compared to GPs have so much authority.'

On top of the 616 GPs who responded to Pulse's survey with the number of monthly inappopriate referrals they receive, almost 200 GPs said they 'don't know' the exact figure.

Oxford GP Dr Chris Kenyon said: 'Not sure how many.... Putting it another way round, it's hard to remember appropriate referrals from 111.'

He added: 'The timescales that 111 set are often unrealistic:- “must” be seen within such & such a time etc.'

Dr Paul Evans, a GP partner in Newcastle, said: ''Cannot quantify, but lots. Bad in normal work, terrible in out of hours - both under and over-triage commonplace.' 

Dr Farah Jameel, BMA GP Committee executive team's clinical and prescribing lead, stressed NHS 111 is intended for 'urgent but not life-threatening health issues'.

She said: ‘NHS 111 acting as a triage tool has the potential to benefit both patients and GPs by directing people to the right service and preventing avoidable GP attendances.

'Its safety and efficacy should rightfully be questioned and scrutinised in depth.'

She added: ‘It is crucial that patients are given proper clinical triage and call handlers are given appropriate levels of training to ensure that patients reach the right health professional for their condition, and that GP appointments are not wasted. In case of emergencies, NHS 111 must ensure that patients are directed to their nearest A&E.’

The BMA has previously called for the system to be scrutinised, after it had been told about colds and sore thumbs being referred to primary care from NHS 111.

NHS England said NHS Pathways - the triage software used by NHS 111 - is regularly independently reviewed and as all calls are recorded locally, GPs with concerns of individual cases should 'feed these back to their colleagues so they can be reviewed and acted upon'.

An NHS England spokesperson said: 'It would be ridiculous and irresponsible to draw national conclusions like this from a tiny, self-selecting survey of 1% of GPs, which takes no account of what people would do if they couldn’t seek advice.

'Thanks to the increasing involvement of clinicians in triaging 111 calls, the proportion of callers who are recommended to primary and community care has fallen for each of the last five years.

'NHS Pathways outcomes are regularly reviewed by an independent clinical panel chaired by the RCGP, and all calls are recorded locally, so if GPs or any other clinicians have concerns about individual cases the responsible thing to do is to feed these back to their colleagues so they can be reviewed and acted upon.'

Last year, NHS England tried to ease pressure on GPs by increasing the number of NHS 111 calls that receive clinical input.

NHS England later said that a 'record number' of 111 calls were being handled by clinicians.

 

Readers' comments (17)

  • Regularly reviewed? Who by? Stevie Wonder?.... I asked specifically about the triage about a 'worst head ache ever' Waking from sleep' ' sudden onset' - etc but was denied the information I requested.... I have no confidence in these systems.... their directors are covering themselves... but not with glory.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 111 will be the cause of the collapse of the NHS. It's shocking triage system dumps patients inappropriately on to A&E or GPs. Sometimes I think a random number generator would do better. I can't believe the madness of some of their referrals.

    A&E now gets so clogged up with 111 nonsense that it has no capacity to deal with the patients that it should be seeing.

    When it came in to our local area, it lead to the collapse of our excellent OOH provider. All that experience was lost overnight. The naivety of Mr Hancock and his blind Faith in technology is beyond belief.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And another 15 million face to face consultations

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is not just NHS111's inadequate algorithms which the call handlers use to triage calls, but mainly the skill set of the NHS 111 "clinicians".
    Almost every clinician call ends with "This needs to be seen".
    Most "clinicians" do not have the skill set for safe telephone consulting to diagnose, prescribe if needed and safety net. This increases patients' anxieties and leads to an unnecessary work dump for GPs / AE/ OOH / UCC.

    The new NHS 111 "clinical assessment service" is supposed to provide a "hear and treat" service for the majority of patients, however what we are seeing on the ground is not effective telephone consulting but ineffective triage which creates more work for other providers.
    Needless to say the contract providers are oblivious to NHS 111's failings in terms of outcomes and efficacy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ever tried using the service? I was forced to several times when my father was terminally ill as it was the only way to contact the district nurses out of hours and that is a disgrace in itself. Even when I just needed to cancel a DN visit as I sorted out the infusion pump after my mother had called them, but 111 refused to listen, totally bound by their protocol, not enough knowledge or training for listening and thinking, so I had to go through the interminable list of screening questions:
    are you the patient?
    are you with the patient?
    what is your relationship to the patient?
    is the patient breathing?
    is the patient conscious?
    is the patient bleeding?
    and it goes on and on.
    This follows several minutes of recorded message and pressing phone buttons as instructed. On that occasion I JUST WANTED TO SAVE A DISTRICT NURSE VISIT but gave up and put the phone down. I wanted to be with my Mum and Dad in his last days and hours, not deal with the nonsense that is 111.
    111 succeeds in making the user very angry before they get anywhere near a doctor. Try it and you will see why your patients are so upset at the start.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It’s becoming GP led in Norfolk and it’s making a hell of a difference. Patients are starting to call 111 instead of their own surgeries. 111 nurses still need a lot of support though through no fault of their own.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Best one I've had "?cutaneous anthrax - contact GP within 2 hours". The patient had a spot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say