This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Health secretary given right to suspend GPs' pensions before conviction

Pension benefits for GPs could be suspended if they are accused of a crime - without necessarily being convicted - under reforms brought in by the Government. 

Under existing law, the health secretary has the power to suspend all or part of any rights to NHS Pension Scheme benefits where a member is convicted of an offence.

But it has decided to extend the powers of the health secretary to be allowed to suspend these rights when a charge has been brought, and before any conviction.

The BMA strongly opposed the measure, warning it would subject 'innocent members to hardship', but the Government decided to continue with the proposal despite their protestations.

Last year, the Department of Health proposed to amend the forfeiture of pension benefits as part of a consultation on proposals to change NHS pension scheme regulations.

As it stands, members of the NHS Pension Scheme are liable to have their rights to a pension removed if convicted of a crime that took place before any benefit or other amount became payable.

The Government decided to extend the 'forfeiture' rules so that the secretary of state 'may suspend pension benefits if a member or other beneficiary is charged or convicted with an offence that may lead to all or part of those benefits being forfeited'.

The BMA warned that suspending a person’s pension benefits before they have been proved guilty of a crime would be unfair as it would subject 'innocent members to hardship'.

The BMA said: 'We oppose the proposal to give the secretary of state the power to suspend a person’s pension benefits before they have been proved guilty of committing a crime. This risks unfairly subjecting innocent members to hardship.

'We believe that the proposed new power is neither necessary nor proportionate and should be abandoned. Alternatively, such a power should be limited either by reference to the length of time of the suspension (having regard to the potential length of criminal proceedings) or by reference to the amount of benefits that may be suspended (having regard to the risk of hardship).'

But the Government argued that existing processes are lengthy as the secretary of state first needs to 'seek representations from the member or beneficiary' before they can use their forfeiture powers.

'This takes time and means that a member may claim benefits before the outcome of court proceedings is known or before the secretary of state directs forfeiture,' the Government said.

'As a consequence, a member or beneficiary may receive substantial pension and lump sum payments from the public purse, notwithstanding the fact that the member has been charged with, or convicted of, serious relevant offences.'

Dr Naureen Bhatti, an East London GP and appraiser, called the move disgraceful.

She said: 'I think this would be gross injustice to be able to do this, it’s disgraceful. To do this before someone has even been proven guilty is an absolute disgrace so I would agree with the BMA. I am really shocked to hear this. 

'It’s too open to harming and I think it will harm more people than in the very rare occasions where someone is such a bad criminal that we don’t want them to get their pension out of the public purse. 

She added: 'These things take years to settle and by then people might have lost their home or might not be able to pay their mortgage so it doesn’t strike me as fair.

'If you think about what happened to Dr Bawa Garba, that’s the sort of person who would have lost their benefits if she were in that stage of her career and yet it was a gross miscarriage of justice as the majority of doctors have confirmed and which has now been shown.'

A Department of Heath and Social Care spokesperson told Pulse that the duration of suspension is at the secretary of state's discretion and will be decided on a case-by-case basis. If the person were to be found innocent, the pension would be reinstated, they added.

The Government said: 'The Department acknowledges the concerns raised by respondents and emphasises the discretionary nature of the proposed suspension power.

'The secretary of state is required to act in accordance with obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998, and also to consider equality implications under the Public-Sector Equality Duty and the impact on families under the "Family Test".

'In addition, general public law principles require the secretary of state to maintain an open mind when deciding whether or not to suspend the right to, or payment of, benefits pending a forfeiture decision and to reach a reasonable and rational decision following consideration of all relevant facts. All representations, including those relating to financial hardship, will be considered by the secretary of state.'

It added: 'In circumstances where the secretary of state applies a suspension but does not subsequently direct forfeiture, or directs forfeiture of an amount less than the amount suspended, then the amount suspended or the difference will be paid to the member together with interest.

'In conclusion, having considered the responses, the Department confirms it will proceed to implement the proposed amendments.'

Related images

  • thinkstock photos 564595088

Readers' comments (36)

  • I don’t see why you lose something you have paid for even if you did commit a crime. In these circumstances are you allowed to claim back all the contributions that have been made to the exchequer. I also thought punishment was the responsibility of the court not the employer. Is this for serious crimes or does it include parking offences....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Looks like not enough people dying to allow the ponzi scheme nhs pension to work
    great tax it to death
    and deny as many as you can aswell
    is it worth having the nhs pension anymore ???
    no final salary schemes like the baby boomers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    Thank God its not Jeremy Hunt

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The death grip of NHSE, GMC, CQC etc. now extends beyond the world of employment. So my money I earn and pay in can be withheld if I do summat or nuffink? Seems unlikely to fill wannabe recruits with confidence - joining a flogged and faltering profession with a pension subject to the capricious and untrustworthy govt. types. (other secretaries of state are also available)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Guilty til proved innocent, bunch of c@@&s

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What happens to politicians &other public sector workers pensions if they have been accused of any crime? Does their pension gets suspended ? If yes then fair enough but if theirs is not suspended and they think they can do it do GP because they are spineless then its shame on BMA & GPC to accept this.
    Bloody crooks & thieves, everybody wants to s**** GPs because we are easy targets and don't hit back

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Dr Bhatti is against the proposal and then goes on to state "where someone is such a bad criminal that we don’t want them to get their pension out of the public purse".

    Public purse? This is the "criminal's" money, deferred income if you will. It is tantamount to double punishment, one by the courts and one by the SoS for health.

    From what I see even if you are retired and no longer a GP they can stop your pension. Is this really true?

    God these gobshite politicians are truly the dregs of the scum of this earth.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And yet an MP can still go to prison and claim her MP salary. Says a lot about the clowns running this country. Absolute disgrace all of them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nothing particularly new.
    There was a king of Scotland and England, known on the mainland as ‘the wisest fool in Christendom’. They also said of him that ‘he would find you guilty before you were tried and hang you before you were found guilty’.
    History repeats itself?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    The NHS is in the poop generally so why would anyone spend time thinking this up? Politicians must hate GPs.....nothing new there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It’s quite unbelievable.
    I remember saying that the pension was the only thing worth working for in the public sector.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have a government so ill informed about basic science/medicine that they choose to ignore actuality. Now they seem to have extended their ignorance and blasé incompetence to basic legality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Next step, make it a crime to retire and Bingo - no more pension

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is pretty disgraceful. But not surprising - one less carrot and one more stick.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let common sense prevail

    This move establishes the principle (long suspected) that the government consider YOUR pension to be THEIR money. It is not. It is yours. You have earned that money and saved that money. They have no right to put their dirty little fingers in it!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One of the reasons I bailed out of the scheme years ago taking my employers contribution with me. It is now in a SIPP, and that is there in perpetuity or until I blow the lot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having read the document I think they will block for crimes such as murder or convictions for treason or offences under the Official Secrets Acts where the member has been sentenced to at least 10 years imprisonment. I don't think it is for parking tickets...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 1. It's not the public purse its personal contributions particularly for GPs.
    2. If GPs will lose pension if convicted then surely this should apply to everyone with a pension state private or otherwis. and what if you dont have a pension should u get additional punishment to make up for it?
    3. Punishment of a crime should be up to the court only.
    This actually beggars belief. Are they actually serious?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Any possible way to keep us under the thumb. Do I get a say if an MP keeps their pension, even if convicted? I think not. Not to mention the various directorships, book deals and other perks available to such types. I don't any of that coming back to the NHS. Our politicians are a disgrace.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So,another disgraceful abuse of power against powerless NHS personnel, and GPs in particular, is planned.
    However,this strikes one as being such an vindictive and egregious suggestion that I doubt it would survive a legal challenge.
    Such a move would surely be considered a breach of the GPs fundamental human rights & that of their dependents.
    I also doubt that the Secretary of State for Health has such power over NHS staff or contractors to the NHS, especially since the govt famously amputated themselves from the legal responsibility of running the NHS under Lansleys disastrous reforms and are therefore no longer our employers or contractors.
    What legal structure could empower such confiscation of a GPs pension by the Secretary of State for Health? These monies are not ill gotten gains and cannot be seized in the same way as criminal assets. There can be no public interest in going after the GPs pension and any punitive action or sentence as a result of prosecution should be ordered by solely the courts ( & by the GMC with regards to ongoing registration).
    If you follow the logic used in this proposal then will confiscation of the accused GP's personal property and private home be the next step as these too was paid for by their NHS income?
    Innocent until proven guilty should remain the guiding principle...though the Dr B-G case being a prime example of why even then a case can be ,rightly, overruled on appeal.
    The NHS pension is surely a private asset of the individual & not the property of the state to withhold and it is certainly not public money. It may have been earned in the service of the NHS but ( even if that employee subsequently commits a crime)it was earned legitimately and belongs to the employee who will have paid their contributions over many years whilst being overworked and ill supported in an often overwhelmed and underfunded system...a fact whose implications should be studied in depth when considering any prosecution if NHS staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    yet another reason not to be in the NHS pension..i opted out a few years ago, by a random act of good fortune just before Capita took over its admission. it was difficult enough continuing to contribute as a locum with all the form filling but it turns out there's was a significant possibility my contributions would never have even been recorded anyway due to capita's incompetence. add to that umpteen changes since (rate increases, restrictions on what work qualifies, removal of in service death benefits) and more recently the mess over locum pension 'annualisation' (very difficult to get your head around) and now this ..stick it in a SIPP, at least you know where it is, exactly how much is there and it's under your direct control not whoever happens to be overseeing the cash strapped NHS - who seems to think the money's theirs and it's given as a form of government charity to the greedy and over paid public employe. Pensions represent too much cash not to be a constant temptation to the string of weasel politicians standing between you and your retirement..and forward to the day you die. I thought this when i left the scheme, events since have confirmed i was right and my god i'm glad i'm not in it. I do however now have a swelling SIPP it's there for me to see and no one is using it as a ball a chain to get me to do stuff i shouldn't be doing. enough already

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It sounds like this will apply to all NHS Pension Scheme members but Pulse have headlined it to be about GPs rather than all doctors / NHS staff to get our attention.

    But this doesn't change my view that this is disgraceful - another potential "innocence tax". At least you might get Legal Aid if you had no pension income... although one might envisage the twisted system denying you Legal Aid because your income is too great, then subsequently withdrawing this income...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds like theft to me. Are we indentured to SoS?

    What a meagre excuse for this bunch of morally destitute cowboys to go to war again with a profession. Others have remarked on the sinister and purposeful nature of this; hostile environment - asserting control by making us scared and cowed.

    Does Simon Stevens have anything to say on our behalf?

    I would request that BMA take QC's legal advice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Say it with me folks, this is what you get with a universal socialised healthcare service, when the state controls the funds. And the leftists here want us to give them MORE tax to hoard? Great idea....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Legal challenge? Guess who is paying for both sides of the case. Yes the taxpayer of course!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    Like the above: this surely cannot survive a legal challenge. If your "union" doesn't get on with a challenge, someone could try crowdfunding it like Dr Hadiza. But if that is needed, then leave the BMA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not only do I personally have zero respect for CQC and GMC this really makes my blood boil.These have been personal contributions.
    Zero respect for current politicians also.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • LIke I have been saying on these forums for the pat year over and over and over again. Forget your representatives they are self serving servants of the government. What I am about to say is not elegant but the only way to force the idea through.

    Its the F'ing GPs that don't stand up for their rights.

    My colleagues all around me act like spineless puppets. No doubt then that many must agree with all these political unethical attacks on GP's.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its up to the courts to award financial penalties IF a criminal is found guilty- not the whim of the Health Secretary.

    DOH are very unwise to get involved starting these witch hunts.

    Stopping a pension only punishes the innocent dependants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    I think the DoH must have appointed Alan Partridge as legal counsel. "After all, the Police are hardly likely to arrest someone if they were innocent...."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NHS pension scheme is rapidly losing all credibility.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Banana republic bis! Politicians can't even 'Breakshit' but they won't stop thrashing GPs - maybe MPs accused of wrongdoing should also be stripped of all pensions and reimbursements before they are even tried!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So the money you have paid in you are unable to get for your old age if some senseless judge punished Dr Bawa Garba for things she has not done. It is a fundamental breach of morality and human rights. Doctors should not have less rights than ordinary citizens. I have stopped the pension scheme as I do not trust these politicians. Better in my bank. At least I know how much is there and there is no such nonsense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    He thanks his stars he is not a GP :)))

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MPs leak information from National Security Meeting......proposed action to be taken - an investigation and MP to resign.
    I am sure a GP would have been paraded, stripped of pension and any assets, then vilified, tried for treason and crucified.
    What a wonderful world.
    These parliamentarians seem to be living in Orwell's animal farm!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say