This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

RCGP threatened with court action again over BME bias

Exclusive The international doctor’s group that took the RCGP to court over the MRCGP exam in 2013 is ‘strongly considering’ legal action against the College again, Pulse has learned.

The British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) has said it has been in regular discussion with the RCGP since the verdict found the clinical skills assessment (CSA) was lawful, despite the differential attainment in the pass rate between white and non-white medical graduates.

Yet BAPIO has said that the RCGP has not been following through with any of the suggestions made during these discussions and that the only way forward now is to ‘go for another judicial review.’

The RCGP said the meetings with BAPIO have been 'constructive' so it was 'disappointing' that BAPIO are speaking out in this manner. 

In 2014, the judge found the CSA exam was lawful but Mr Justice Mitting said in his judgement that if the RCGP does not act, it is subject to a further challenge.

BAPIO president Dr Ramesh Mehta said there is no point continuing talks if the RCGP doesn’t accept BAPIO’s advice.

He said: ‘Soon after the verdict, RCGP invited us for a talk to see what can be done and since then we’ve been talking on a regular basis with RCGP. The RCGP has said (and they keep on saying) that CSA is not an issue. The issue is with the training and they say, "we want to maintain the quality". However, we are not happy at all with this, because we have suggested a few things and they haven’t followed through.

‘What they’re doing is a tick box. What’s the point of talking to us if you don’t change anything, if you don’t accept our advice? The only way forward now, we are very strongly considering whether we should take Mr Justice Mitting's advice and go for another judicial review. It’s a nightmare.’

The RCGP has issued a statement, saying that it is 'disappointing' that BAPIO has chosen to speak out in this manner.

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'It is disappointing that BAPIO have chosen to air their opinions in this way as our meetings with them – as well as with other stakeholders and experts in the field of licensing examinations - have been constructive in our opinion, and have helped shape the steps we are taking to ensure the MRCGP continues to be a fair and robust assessment, as the independent review found it was, and to address the root causes of differential attainment issues in medical education and training.'

Last year, the RCGP published its independent 10-year review of the MRCGP, which concluded the exam was ‘fit for purpose and fair’ to all candidates and patients.

Professor Stokes-Lampard added in response that the MRCGP exam has ‘no characteristics’ that would cause differential attainment.

She said: ‘The recent independent review of the MRCGP assessment, commissioned by the College, found that the CSA and AKT were fit for purpose and fair for both candidates and patients. It found no characteristics of the exam design or administration procedures that would cause differential pass rates, but it did make recommendations in the spirit of continuous quality improvement.

‘Work on two such initiatives - reviewing the ethnic diversity of CSA cases, and taking steps to ensure the examiners panel was inclusive and representative - is underway and progress will be reported on further in our MRCGP annual report later this year.’

Following the review, the RCGP added that it has developed resources and events to support trainers and trainees in CSA preparation and also introduced an exceptional fifth attempt of the CSA or AKT exam.

In 2017, a Pulse analysis of CSA pass rates found the gap between white and black and minority ethnic doctors was the widest ever recorded.

According to the RCGP's latest annual report from 2017/18, the pass rate of the AKT exam for white doctors was 86.8% and 60.7% for all BME doctors. For the CSA exam, 93.8% of white graduates passed, compared with 83.4% of UK-educated BME graduates and 39% of internationally-educated BME graduates.

Professor Aneez Esmail from the University of Manchester, who wrote a GMC-commissioner report on the fairness of the MRCGP, said the changes are just ‘cosmetic’.

He said: ‘These changes are simply cosmetic and certainly won’t make any impact (as the recent data shows). They have been saying the same thing for many years now and you would have thought that despite trying to do something and realising nothing has changed that they would try a different tack.

‘I remain sceptical as to how committed they are to change. They will say that there is no evidence of discrimination and are in effect are putting their heads in the sand, ignoring the facts and hoping that something will change but probably more importantly that no one will complain too much.’

But there are efforts elsewhere to help international doctors pass the MRCGP exam. Health Education England has stated it has some initiatives to guide international doctors.

HEE's deputy medical director of primary care, Professor Simon Gregory, said: ‘The focus is on providing a re-entry route for those who were progressing in training but were unable to pass just one of the exam components of the MRCGP qualification in the time available. We don’t want to end up losing trainees simply because they needed a little bit of extra time on one of the components of training.’

Readers' comments (26)

  • It would be sufficient if all BAPIO members and BMEs just stopped paying contributions.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    identify politics, yawn, that and brexit (double yawn) are the only stories in town

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    BAPIO, BME, FFS, WTF

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took this exam in 2013 and failed once..being a “UK trained BME” it wasn’t much of a surprise to me as that was during the eye of the storm of the bapio case. I remember thinking back then of the sheep being led to slaughter as I was waiting to go in to the exam in Euston and listening to a hypocritical RCGP “examiner” announce beforehand to the group that the exam wasn’t racist. Lol . The judicial review outcome was typically hypocritical because how could they conclude that it was “lawful” while at the same time say that “changes” were needed. Changes have not been made so bapio or someone should take this racist organisation to court again please! By the way I was given a 6 month “extension” to training for “communication skills” even though I had passed all components of MRCGP (AKT, CSA, WPBA) within the required 3 years. Go figure. I was a lucky one. I saw people whose careers and lives were ruined by this organisation. Only in the UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CSA is a dogs dinner of an exam, with it's relentless focus on 'communication skills' (in practice trying to second guess exactly what people want and manipulate them into buying it). This will inevitably bias against anyone who is not from a UK culture, has darker skin or who has some degree of spectrum traits. Doctors need to be polite and nice to people, not perfect. How this has been allowed to carry on is anyone's guess but the cat's out the bag and we know the exam must be reformed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bapio should consider what the challenge should be based on. The MRCGP is meant to discriminate between those who meet the skills and communication norms on which it is based, and those who do not.
    It is not discriminatory on race or skin colour, but on communication items which may be linked to 'spectrum' conditions, and certainly are to environmental background - not necessarily 'foreign' culture either!
    think before acting alone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    it's too easy to blame everything on racism - it's a lazy position to take which is almost impossible to counter and gives anyone who feels in anyway aggrieved and instant excuse. You can't claim racism if you fail and you happen to be white - as someone who has at times failed and who happens to be white, i can tell you it's uncomfortable and often requires some soul searching and self analysis which isn't pleasant. I am not suggesting racism doesn't exist but it seems to me is too easy to use as a quick explanation enabling an individual to avoid confronting the possibility they aren't perfect, i would suggest it's a particularly attractive option for those who might be lacking in self awareness. if you can't communicate well who's to blame ? the other guy of cause - certainly not you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Primary care in UK & NI is on its knees and yet RCGP reject excellent doctors because they aren’t cringy and complacent enough. They want doctors with homogenised personalities who fit a mould for corporate supply of services. Most other cultures value and encourage diversity in individuals. Even many more mature patients in the UK find the CSA skills to be irritating and creepy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So why is there a differential pass rate in the AKT- a machine marked paper? Why are there differential pass rates throughout medical school training?
    And last but not least why is there gross under representation of the white working class in medicine?
    Throwing racism up in the air the whole time ignores emerging evidence and seeks to justify victim status.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And just for the record the CSA is a Clinical Skills Exam not a Communication Skills Exam. Those who aren't successful largely fail in the management domain. They either don't know what to do or they do the wrong thing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say