This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NICE 'considering' evidence to cut treatment threshold for hypertension

Exclusive NICE is considering new evidence which led to drastically lowered hypertension thresholds in the US, Pulse has learned.

The clinical advisory body, which is currently reviewing UK hypertension guidelines with a view to updating them in August 2019, told Pulse the reviews were 'asking the same questions'.

The new US guidelines, published by the American Heart Association, decreased the threshold for stage one hypertension from an average systolic blood pressure of 140 to 130 mmHg, and from ≥160 to ≥140 mmHg for stage two.

Researchers said the changes could mean an extra 14% of people were diagnosed with hypertension, which would bring the total number to 46% of the country's population.

The change was prompted by the 2015 SPRINT study, which showed that by treating patients with a target blood pressure of 120 mmHg, rather than the 140 mmHg target, mortality and cardiovascular events were significantly reduced.

When asked whether the changes brought in the US would be considered in the updated UK guidelines, a NICE spokesperson said: 'Yes, we are asking some of the same questions being considered in the US and in doing so will be considering some of the same evidence.'

Current NICE guidelines define stage one hypertension as an average blood pressure of 135/85 mmHg or higher, and stage two as 150/95 mmHg or higher. It states that doctors should ‘offer antihypertensive drug treatment to people of any age with stage two hypertension’.

If the UK were to follow the US example, many patients currently defined as having stage one and treated with lifestyle changes could be pushed into stage two and medicated.

But this comes as last year, a meta analysis of 24 studies found that the evidence for reducing blood pressure targets to below 140 mmHg in over-60s was inconsistent.

The paper said that although lowering the targets could be beneficial, they could also be linked with a higher medication burden and an increased risk of short-term issues, such as hypotension.

Cardiology expert Dr Chris Aden, a GP in Southampton, said: 'It's going to be challenging in terms of the numbers they're suggesting.

'I think it's down to good clinical common sense in how we apply it, particularly in the elderly or more frail groups’.

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'Lowering the threshold for making the diagnosis of any condition is a significant decision, that will affect thousands, if not millions of patients, and must not be taken lightly.'

‘One concern GPs already have is overdiagnosis - where we are giving a label to a situation thereby medicalising it, and prescribing medications when the benefits to the individual patient may be very limited.

'This can be harmful for patients both in terms of causing unnecessary anxiety, and in terms of taking medication that they might not need.’

Pulse revealed in 2016 that new evidence including the SPRINT trial had prompted NICE advisors to consider updating hypertension guidelines for the first time since they were published in 2011.

Hypertension guidelines in full

New US classification

Normal <120/80 mmHg

Elevated 120-129/<80 mmHg

Stage 1 hypertension 130-139/80-89 mmHg

Stage 2 hypertension ≥140/90 mmHg

Current NICE guideline

Stage 1 hypertension - Clinic blood pressure is 140/90 mmHg or higher and subsequent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) daytime average or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) average blood pressure is 135/85 mmHg or higher

Stage 2 hypertension - Clinic blood pressure is 160/100 mmHg or higher and subsequent ABPM daytime average or HBPM average blood pressure is 150/95 mmHg or higher

Severe hypertension - Clinic systolic blood pressure is 180 mmHg or higher or clinic diastolic blood pressure is 110 mmHg or higher

Sources: American Heart Association;  NICE

Readers' comments (11)

  • my bp has always been over 130 since I first checked it as a med student.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Big Pharma rubbing their hands with glee!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not just the anxiety caused by labelling a patient with borderline hypertension but increased side effects from medication that may not be needed and, no doubt, triggering CKD3 from the use of ACE inhibitors and even more costs to the annual medication budget.
    Do we really know what we are doing anymore? The days of being a normal healthy individual seem long gone!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 46% of the country's population.
    Really?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doctordog.

    Which drug are we putting in the drinking water?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    So the Yanks think a BP of 120/60 is “elevated”? Postural hypotension clearly doesn’t exist in the USA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Assuming no children or young adults involved, well over 50% of our older adults will have a "disease" which requires life long medication!
    Blimey!!! The sick outnumber the well!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I’m sure the Orthopaedic providers are delighted. More NOFs to patch up. Anyone remember “joined up thinking”?

    Maybe Gove was right. I’m sick of experts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One wonders if drilling down into the murky aspects of research funding and lobbying, just how much of this is driven by a desire of the drug industry to medicalise everything.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent. Homo Sapiens is meant to live forever if only the reality of death did not intervene. We need to keep people alive for longer, irrespective of their quality of life because our health service needs the training opportunities this provides and dealing with the increasing demands this will present is not an issue because we have oodles of spare capacity.(/s).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say