This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GPs issue warning over loss of redirection service for wrongly addressed mail

Exclusive GPs have voiced concern for patients after learning NHS England is set to scrap mail redirection following the loss of local primary care support services.

The local teams currently ensure mail from hospitals addressed to the wrong GP provider is redirected to the correct surgery, but the new national support services contract being tendered by NHS England does not include funding for this.

GP leaders warned the loss of the redirection service would lead to increased workload for practices and potential delays to patient care as they would be forced to return mail to hospitals instead.

NHS England said that all acute trusts have access to a central database containing GP registration details of patients in England and should therefore confirm the current GP of a patient before sending correspondence.

However, in a letter to practices, Londonwide LMCs warned that they felt there were ‘clinical risks’ to this approach.

Londonwide LMCs wrote: ‘NHS England has communicated that it expects secondary care providers to deal with returned correspondence in a timely manner and correct their records so that future correspondence is sent to the correct practice in the first instance…

‘Londonwide LMC has expressed concern that there are clinical risks associated with this approach, which relies on the adequacy of secondary care systems to ensure that there are minimal delays to GPs receiving letters, and from hospitals and patients receiving outpatient appointments and invitations for investigations.’

NHS England announced that it would be putting the £100 million Primary Care Support Services contract out for competitive tender last year in a bid to shave £40 million from its support services budget and ‘free up more money for care’.

NHS England advertised the contract to private providers last year and is currently reviewing a shortlist of three candidates to take on the contract.

It has already revealed that ‘non core’ services not to be funded under the new contract would include keeping patient population databases up to date; GP courier services for collecting records; and administrative tasks including notifying patients of practice closure.

An NHS England spokesperson said: ‘It is the responsibility of secondary care providers to ensure their records are up to date and deal with any returned correspondence in a timely manner. In a significant number of areas across the country, practices already return incorrectly addressed correspondence to the sender, who has the legal responsibility from a data perspective to ensure information they send is correctly addressed.

‘To bring procedures in line with current legislation, all practices will adopt this approach, which is supported by the RCGP and the BMA.’


Readers' comments (3)

  • 'Return to sender'
    will cardiology opd now be Heartbreak Hotel?

    This is the continuation of snipping off as much in contracts that can be got away with by NHSE; the workload dumped on primary and secondry care this time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Done the same with the Organ Donor and Blood Donor service as well, expecting GP practices to pickup the work for nothing.

    Goodbye donations from my practice, we just can't take this work on for nothing and while we will tell patients to do the signup themselves online, I doubt if they will.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is it not somewhat ironic that all the media hype is about care closer to home, but the mandarins in their ivory towers keep moving the services we rely on further and further away, and outsourcing them to people who don't know anything. Or just cut them. As well as this, and longer maintaining the organ donor register, they are removing the free SMS messaging service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say