This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

GPs to be employees of new integrated care organisations, under Labour plans to integrate care

GPs will be employed by new integrated care organisations set up in every area of the country, under the Labour party’s 10-year NHS plan for Government.

Setting out the details of the plan today, shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said there were currently ‘too many’ NHS organisations, but that Labour would provide the incentive for ‘all providers’ to ‘evolve’ into integrated care organisations (ICOs).

Under the plans, ‘young GPs’ would be encouraged to work for the ICOs as an alternative route to a GP partnership.

The ICOs will be set up in ‘every health economy’ and will be paid a single ‘Year of Care’ tariff to provide primary, secondary and social care to people deemed most at risk of hospitalisation.

Mr Burnham said he had originally envisaged hospitals taking the lead on forming ICOs - as he revealed in an interview with Pulse last year - but that he had accepted that there was not ‘one model of care’ and that they could be led by GP practices.

He added that the ICO will ‘hold the ring’ and provide a single point of contact for patients.

He added: ‘It no longer makes sense to focus solely on the viability of individual institutions, particularly where efforts to secure the finances of one could end up destabilising all around it.

‘The public spending outlook for the next 10 years brings a new reality. To compete in silos is a luxury we can no longer afford. The stark truth is that there are too many separate organisations with separate administrations.

‘There are savings to be made from reducing administrations in every health economy in England. We need to break down the silos and end those divides that hold us back: primary versus secondary care, physical versus mental health, NHS versus councils… [P]eople must leave loyalties to parts of the system behind and embrace a new shared loyalty to the local population.’

Speaking also at a roundtable attended by Pulse yesterday, Mr Burnham said the integrated care organisations caring for the most vulnerable people would employ ‘younger GPs at the start of their career’ and would ‘take a little bit of pressure off’ the rest of the GP workforce.

He said: ‘The most vulnerable patients could be cared for differently in a different model of care… that takes a little bit of the pressure off.

‘It’s also about saying that if younger GPs in the early part of their career want to work for an integrated care organisation then that is something that I think we would encourage. I met a group in Manchester recently who said: “We don’t want to become partners in a practice straight away, we want to work differently. We’d like a more salaried position to begin with and maybe go into partnership later on in our career”.’

And, speaking today, Mr Burnham indicated that these integrated care organisations is where Labour’s 8,000 new GPs would work, as he said the party would ‘create a ladder’ into NHS work via its ‘Time to Care’ £2.5bn NHS fund for young people wanting to work in the new system of integrated care.

Commenting on the plans, Professor Sir John Oldham, the GP leading Labour’s healthcare commission which reported last year, said in his view the plan did not need to signal the end of GP partnerships, but said that GP ‘corner shops’ would no longer be viable.

He said: ‘In terms of general practice and partnerships and where that goes, none of this interferes with what I see as the natural progression and debate that would go on anyway in general practice and primary care about what is the nature of our orgnisations to meet the future demands. My personal view is I think that the sort of things that [RCGP chair Dr] Maureen Baker has been talking about: federated structures, larger conglomerations of people sharing back-office functions, employing specialists themselves - rheumatologists, dermatologists, my own practice before we had a dermatologist there for 15 years, we did ultrasounds, we did ecocardiograms.

‘So I think there are huge exciting opportunities for general practice and primary care to occupy a space, should they wish to do so. What won’t work is not cooperating with people. What won’t work is deciding on having a corner shop mentality. That won’t work but working on a bigger scale will work. I think the future is a very exciting one for general practice. My career is in the past for that but I, in a sense, would love to start again.’

Readers' comments (38)

  • Another big steamimg pile of health policy is emmited from an orifice of a politician.Where are they going to get thes enthusiastic young GPs from?the same orifice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The words nail , final and coffin .......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Gillham

    A salaried job for an ICO doing heating checks and loneliness testing? I cannot think of a less appealing and more depressing job for an optimistic young GP at the beginning of their career.

    They don't want partnerships because they're finding their feet locuming or having a year in Australia. They enjoy the freedom and the readier cash.

    Unless the ICOGP jobs include a pay package well in advance of current salaried posts, and include regular secondments to somewhere hot and sunny, this is a woeful non-starter.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So no top down reorganisation again then.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are politicians mouths always open in photos ? Oh yes, that's because the only voice they're interested in listening to is their own. At least they're being up front about wanting to do a complete top-down NHS reorganisation again, ahead of the general election., unlike Tories last time round. Painfully obvious that Labour isn't going to be in government so I wouldn't get too stressed, my colleagues !!! They can say whatever they want, allow yourself an ironic laugh at their expense !

    Our federations are getting up and running and our main focus so far has been empowering individual practices to reject unfunded / inappropriate work, wherever it may come from - secondary care / private Consultants / allied health professionals / schools / employers / patients. The BMA / GPC workload document has actually been quite a help here.

    Being more militant and defending our core contract duties is actually easier than you may think.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, they take something that works and that patients like (small GP partnership model) but as it does not fit into their empire building and their need to keep changing everything, they make it more and more onerous, micromanaged, regulated, etc so that no-one wants to do it any more. Is John Oldham a practising GP?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why don't we contact the Govts of Australia, NZ and Canada to let them know there are highly qualified doctors available who might actually prefer to work there instead of some theoretical imaginary organizations i.e. private healthcare with lots of investment and shares held by british politicians.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All change.....but no change

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It no longer matters who is in power; Real health policy is generated from Whitehall and corporate lobby groups; The agenda has for many years been to strip GP's on independent contractor status and to make them salaried employees and now we are beginning to see the final stages of its implementation. Hence the erosion of autonomy and influence that has occurred over the past few years. Its merely a replication of the model of GOOD OLD FASHIONED BRITISH STATE DIRECTED SOCIALISM.

    conservative, labour, lib dem et al are irrelevant and this is why agendas are steamrolled through without thought and due process such as the LANSLEY shenanigans.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another nail in the coffin of the partnership model. Wave goodbye to the continuity of personal care that is the whole point of general practice.
    It takes 2 salaried GPs to see the number of patients I seen in a day as a partner - or would do if there were any to recruit. The impending retirement bulge of experienced partners will really cause the s*** to hit the fan.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say