Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs vote against closure of local A&E

GPs in Surrey have unanimously voted to oppose the closure of A&E services and a maternity unit, following a ballot organised by local MPs.

Thirty-two GPs in the Sutton area voted against plans to downgrade St Helier Hospital in Surrey, while no GPs came out in favour.

The plans are part of a major review carried out jointly by healthcare organisations including acute trusts, NHS England local area teams and CCGs. It is investigating options for reconfiguring healthcare services across a wide area of south and west London, called the Better Services Better Value Review.

This follows the case in south east London, where health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s decision to downgrade the A&E at Lewisham Hospital was thrown out of the courts, partly because it failed to garner the support of GP commissioners.

NHS Surrey Downs CCG – one of the CCGs in the region - withdrew its support for the reconfiguration of hospital services this month following a separate ballot, while Sutton CCG withdrew support after a separate ballot of GPs came out against the proposals.

The ballot was organised by local Lib Dem MPs Paul Burstow and Tom Brake. Mr Burstow is MP for Sutton, Cheam and Worcester Park, while Mr Brake’s constituency is Carshalton and Wallington.

Around 90 GPs in the area did not take part in the vote, but Mr Burstow argues that this is partly because some believed the review plans were on hold following NHS Surrey Downs CCG’s decision.

The consortium behind the review argue that it wants to develop a system allowing patients to experience ‘a seamless service between different part of the system and to get things right first time more often’.

Dr Brendan Hudson, chairman of Sutton CCG said the CCGs in south west London, told : ‘The BSBV pre-consultation business case is now invalid and the options put forward are not going to be put to a public consultation so the MP survey result is not surprising.’

Readers' comments (2)

  • Vinci Ho

    Here we go again.
    People know the truth
    High Court told people the truth who had broken the law
    Question is why hasn't the SOS resigned by now??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To clarify, Surrey Downs CCG announced it would withdraw from the BSBV programme some weeks ago, following a ballot by the CCG of its GPs. Sutton CCG has not made any such announcement.

    Two MPs did try to organise a ballot of Sutton GPs but as Surrey Downs CCG has withdrawn from the programme, the previous BSBV business case is no longer valid and there are no proposals on the table to vote for or against. The vast majority of Sutton GPs therefore took the advice of their CCG and ignored the ballot (only 33 of 124 responded).

    FYI, Sutton practices were previously balloted by the CCG in May and supported the proposals that were then being put forward going to public consultation.

    The current position is set out on the BSBV website here http://www.bsbv.swlondon.nhs.uk/

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say