Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS England to spend a ‘much higher proportion’ of budget on general practice over next five years

NHS England will be investing ‘a much higher proportion’ of its budget on GP services including premises, it has said in its five-year plan announced today.

It said that ‘given the pressures they are under, we need a “new deal” for GPs’, and promised to ‘stabilise core funding’ for GPs for the next two years.

The plans also reveal that it will increase funding for ‘primary care infrastructure’ and design incentives to encourage GPs to work and set up new practices in ‘under-doctored areas’.

It also confirmed plans trailed by chief executive Simon Stevens at the RCGP conference earlier this month for ‘Multispecialty Community Providers’ set up by GPs that will employ consultants, alongside ‘Primary and Acute Care Systems’ that will be hospitals employing GPs.

The GPC said the ‘time for talking’ about funding was over, and it was time for NHS England to make the funds available, and it also expressed its ‘grave concerns’ about plans for hospitals to employ GPs.

The ‘Five-Year Forward View’, which was co-authored with CQC, Monitor, the Trust Development Authority, Public Health England and Health Education England, says that primary care remains the ‘foundation’ of the NHS.

The document says: ‘The foundation of NHS care will remain list-based primary care. Given the pressures they are under, we need a “new deal” for GPs. Over the next five years the NHS will invest more in primary care, while stabilising core funding for general practice nationally over the next two years.’

It adds: ‘General practice, with its registered list and everyone having access to a family doctor, is one of the great strengths of the NHS, but it is under severe strain. Even as demand is rising, the number of people choosing to become a GP is not keeping pace with the growth in funded training posts – in part because primary care services have been under-resourced compared to hospitals. So over the next five years we will invest more in primary care.’

In response to a question from Pulse, Mr Stevens said NHS England could not put a figure on the amount to be invested in primary care because the overall NHS budget is not yet known.

He said ‘We do explicitly say that we think that spending in primary care needs to increase and there are some things that need to be done immediately to stabilise the pressures that exist in general practice.

‘And, obviously we don’t put a figure on the different elements of spending over the next Parliament because we don’t know what the overall NHS budget is going to be, but we think it is entirely likely that to deliver on the care models that are described here, we will be seeing a much higher proportion of the NHS budget going on primary care.’

Other key points from the document include:

  • GP-led organisations employing nurses, community health services, hospital specialists, and ‘perhaps’ mental health and social care to provide ‘integrated out-of-hospital care’.
  • Hospital trusts employing GPs and using surplus hospital budgets to invest in branching out to deliver primary care.
  • An estimate that the projected £30bn funding gap in the NHS budget by 2020 could be reduced to around £8bn based on these efficiencies.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said that NHS England must act now.

He said: ‘Much of what is in the report has been stated many times before and whilst there is a lot of talk about investing in general practice, the time for talking is over, it’s now time to act and urgently invest in core general practice. 

‘The bottom line is that there is only three-quarters of the historical investment left in general practice and working at scale won’t help solve this problem. We need to get back to 11% of NHS funding spent on general practice to have any chance of addressing the current crisis.’

He also said that the GPC is already supporting practices working together in bigger groups, but attacked the plans for the new models of primary care.

He said: ‘We have grave concerns about hospitals taking over practices. This may be necessary in exceptional circumstances, such as some remote and rural area where it is not viable to sustain practices in any other way, but we know from experience that hospitals are good at sucking resources out of community services, not investing in them.’

Related images

  • Simon Stevens - online

Readers' comments (27)

  • and pigs might fly..on the basis of their record i no longer believe a single word from nhse..who i hold in well deserved contempt.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with the above on the basis of the actions of the Government and NHSE,combined with our union(soon to be not a member)with the Royal College I for one do not trust any of the establishment to have any interest of empathy with the issues effecting jobbing GPs.These measly words(not yet actions)will not win me over.It will take an awful lot to get my trust again ,If ever.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do not believe it. I do not trust him. His document/paper 2004 about changing the NHs when worked for labour described the end of "exceptionalism" (?freecare) and "constructive discomfort" (?the *rap we are dealing with now) and end of single point of blame (the government).

    remember there is an election on the horizon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    Indeed, and if they WERE to send the money towards GPs, the CCGs would immediately burgle it to prop up the local ED; or something else of their choice. (NO offence to ED meant at all.)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Increased funding = increase for GMS/PMS contract holders?

    I think not. I suspect Increased funding = lucrative APMS contract for private providers (aka minister's chums)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ah, you gotta love it. The "Five Year Backwards Plan" would seem more apt. What a novel idea- consultants employed by primary care and GPs employed by the hospital. Let's do the minor ops list in emergency theatre and nurse the ITU patients in the surgery...There is no need for a new deal and trainees aren't failing to choose general practice because it is underfunded. They are failing to choose it because the profession has been slandered and dismantled piecemeal by repeated political meddling. What a load of rubbish.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The ‘Five-Year Forward View’, which was co-authored with CQC, Monitor, the Trust Development Authority, Public Health England and Health Education England"

    So it was authored by people who know sweet f all about primary care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets invent fundholding and GP led cottage hospitals

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Objective is privatisation of the health service . Distract the workforce with promises of jam tomorrow . Assemble private providers to step in when primary care collapses. They can then refer all their customers to the private secondary care providers . Job done . THE TRUE FIVE YEAR PLAN

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • Name the politicians who were behind giving draconian powers to CQC and putting irrational decision makers in NHSE so the public can vote accordingly.
    Money to Propco - and then privatize this by selling to a US firm would be a last effective move which can be expected after the election if the presen government stays.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say