This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

The docbot will see you now

NHS England to spend a ‘much higher proportion’ of budget on general practice over next five years

NHS England will be investing ‘a much higher proportion’ of its budget on GP services including premises, it has said in its five-year plan announced today.

It said that ‘given the pressures they are under, we need a “new deal” for GPs’, and promised to ‘stabilise core funding’ for GPs for the next two years.

The plans also reveal that it will increase funding for ‘primary care infrastructure’ and design incentives to encourage GPs to work and set up new practices in ‘under-doctored areas’.

It also confirmed plans trailed by chief executive Simon Stevens at the RCGP conference earlier this month for ‘Multispecialty Community Providers’ set up by GPs that will employ consultants, alongside ‘Primary and Acute Care Systems’ that will be hospitals employing GPs.

The GPC said the ‘time for talking’ about funding was over, and it was time for NHS England to make the funds available, and it also expressed its ‘grave concerns’ about plans for hospitals to employ GPs.

The ‘Five-Year Forward View’, which was co-authored with CQC, Monitor, the Trust Development Authority, Public Health England and Health Education England, says that primary care remains the ‘foundation’ of the NHS.

The document says: ‘The foundation of NHS care will remain list-based primary care. Given the pressures they are under, we need a “new deal” for GPs. Over the next five years the NHS will invest more in primary care, while stabilising core funding for general practice nationally over the next two years.’

It adds: ‘General practice, with its registered list and everyone having access to a family doctor, is one of the great strengths of the NHS, but it is under severe strain. Even as demand is rising, the number of people choosing to become a GP is not keeping pace with the growth in funded training posts – in part because primary care services have been under-resourced compared to hospitals. So over the next five years we will invest more in primary care.’

In response to a question from Pulse, Mr Stevens said NHS England could not put a figure on the amount to be invested in primary care because the overall NHS budget is not yet known.

He said ‘We do explicitly say that we think that spending in primary care needs to increase and there are some things that need to be done immediately to stabilise the pressures that exist in general practice.

‘And, obviously we don’t put a figure on the different elements of spending over the next Parliament because we don’t know what the overall NHS budget is going to be, but we think it is entirely likely that to deliver on the care models that are described here, we will be seeing a much higher proportion of the NHS budget going on primary care.’

Other key points from the document include:

  • GP-led organisations employing nurses, community health services, hospital specialists, and ‘perhaps’ mental health and social care to provide ‘integrated out-of-hospital care’.
  • Hospital trusts employing GPs and using surplus hospital budgets to invest in branching out to deliver primary care.
  • An estimate that the projected £30bn funding gap in the NHS budget by 2020 could be reduced to around £8bn based on these efficiencies.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said that NHS England must act now.

He said: ‘Much of what is in the report has been stated many times before and whilst there is a lot of talk about investing in general practice, the time for talking is over, it’s now time to act and urgently invest in core general practice. 

‘The bottom line is that there is only three-quarters of the historical investment left in general practice and working at scale won’t help solve this problem. We need to get back to 11% of NHS funding spent on general practice to have any chance of addressing the current crisis.’

He also said that the GPC is already supporting practices working together in bigger groups, but attacked the plans for the new models of primary care.

He said: ‘We have grave concerns about hospitals taking over practices. This may be necessary in exceptional circumstances, such as some remote and rural area where it is not viable to sustain practices in any other way, but we know from experience that hospitals are good at sucking resources out of community services, not investing in them.’

Related images

  • Simon Stevens - online

Readers' comments (27)

  • Medway GMS Contractor gets for 4000 list less than 300,000 per year.
    A tender ongoing for APMS for list size less than 4000 patients - price 340000. There probably will be KPIs and other payments on top.
    Supposedly, competition brings prices down !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Wrigley

    There is a simple solution to the financial problems in the NHS that will free up billions of pounds that could be spent on patient care.

    1. Abolish the internal market - the Health Select Committee estimate this will save at least £10 BILLION
    2. End PFI deals and bring them back to the public sector - this will save the taxpayer (at the very least) £50 BILLION

    Imagine what such sums could do in the NHS instead of the funds going to the private sector as they do now.

    Politicians and civil servants always dodge the question on these issues when asked about them but it is clear to me and many other NHS campaigners action on these would resolve many of the problems we now see in the NHS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interviewed on the R4 Today programme, Simon Stevens would not acknowledge the true scale of NHS contracts awarded to private companies. Estimates vary but are somewhere between 56 and 70%.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @11.11 the problem is ending pfi deals, mainly thanks to Labour, will cost even more!! whilst it would be nice these contracts are written in stone. But then hey it made Gordon Brown look good for a while..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have over the years seen different Health secretaries , both Labour and Conservatives,always talking about changes and improvements to NHS,but all these people have had only political and personal motives,in all these proposals!,
    The one man,and yes,naturally from our lot,who in my opinion had already had a vision about the historic change which was imminent,and came up with this most unpopular ( among most GP'S), was the " Mega Primary Polyclinics " !!
    What is the hot topic for GP's, how to survive and the simplest answer is ," Mergers and bigger the merger the better"!!
    I think Mr Darzi definitely needs at least a " big thanks "for throwing a solution for which now has become the most burning problem,especially for young GP's!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps each doubter (and its wise to be a sceptic) should arrange to meet with their CCG and Area Team to discuss proposals to take forward the commitments made today - the onus is on the Area Team and the CCGs to find a way forward and they should be held to account or their feet over the flames

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let's just stop there. Let's not find new ways of doctors working, Let's have a new way of politics where the politicians stand up and say this is what we will pay for, this is what we won't pay for. Obviously this would mean politicians taking the blame for political decisions. New ways of working needed......... but for the MPs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    His messages are simple:
    (1) you guys , please stop moaning cos this will put the young ones off
    (2) we will invest more in general practice
    (3) TRUST ME , I am the chief exec

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do we tell the truth or say to potential (suckers ) recruits that " Come on dive in the acid in this bath is lovely ."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Of course more money will come into primary care because we will need it to pay for the consultants. No more new money, just secondary care money paying for secondary care staff.
    Maybe I am getting too cynical!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say