Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP practice relationships with CCGs are 'fragile', report warns

Current relationships between CCGs and GP member practices are 'fragile', with practices feeling unable to affect CCG decision-making.

A joint study by the King's Fund and Nuffield Trust health think tanks found that just one in five (20%) of GPs without a formal commissioning role felt they could influence the work of their CCG if they wanted to. This was a reduction since 2014, when 35% thought they could.

Their survey of GPs and practice managers found that CCGs 'have secured better GP engagement than previous forms of commissioning', with over 70% of member practices at least ‘somewhat’ engaged with the work of their CCG.

But GP practices in six CCGs followed by the think tanks since their creation felt that there had been little or no change in the quality of care in general practice following the introduction of CCGs in 2013.

Analysing the reasons behind the situation, the report said that 'a lack of resources and autonomy are making it difficult for CCGs to effectively engage with their GP members and the pool of GPs currently interested in commissioning work is limited'.

The report said: 'Efforts to involve GPs in commissioning decisions are fragile and being put at risk by a loss of autonomy among CCGs.

'Leaders from all of the CCGs that we have been working with highlighted the risk that top-down direction and control from NHS England would crowd out GPs’ engagement with the commissioning process.'

The report recommended that the Department of Health and NHS England provide CCG leaders with more training, promote commissioning as a career option and set out more clearly the roles of CCGs in developing new general practice care models.

King's Fund policy fellow Ruth Robertson said: 'Our research shows that while CCGs have made good progress in engaging GPs in local commissioning decisions, there remain significant barriers to effective clinical engagement and to translating this into improvements in quality of care.

She added that the 'NHS must now build on CCGs’ achievements and do more to embed clinical involvement in planning decisions across the health care system' - including 'proporly supporting' GP commissioners within CCGs but also making sure they have a stronger voice in the NHS England 'vanguard' new models of care programme and the ongoing work to set out regional sustainability and transformation plans (STPs).

She said: 'As well as properly supporting GP commissioners within CCGs, this means ensuring that GPs and other clinicians have a strong voice in the sustainability and transformation planning process and in the vanguards'.

NHS Clinical Commissioners co-chair Dr Amanda Doyle said: 'As a CCG leader and a GP myself I recognise the challenges and pressures that come with balancing both roles, and we know there is more to do to make sure even more GP colleagues and other clinicians feel able to actively participate in the clinical commissioning process.'

Readers' comments (6)

  • 'GP practice relationships with CCGs are 'fragile''

    lol

    In other news some labour party MPs have 'mild concerns' about Jeremy Corbyn's performance...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If you want better relationships with us:
    a) Don't shat on us from height.
    b) Remember that just because it makes sense for commissionados, doesn't mean its good for practices.
    c) Don't use the phrase 'more for less', 'QIPP' or 'efficiency savings' - its bullshit, call it cuts - that's what it is.
    d) Don't give us ridiculous deadlines, mad/bad data requests, wooly contracts and brainless payments
    e) Pay us on time.
    f) Recognise that every stupid decision you make results in more workload for us shoveling your dumb ass out of the excrement.
    g) Don't ask us to do the same audit we did last year hoping it will now save money it didn't last time.
    h) Try, just for a minute, to imagine that we might just understand a little about what front line services look like, and credit us with a little sense.

    If you want more people to get involved in commissioning:
    a) find some more of us so we're not so desperate in the day job.
    b) Pay at a sensible rate for the actual hours done, not some tiny fantasy of what it takes to do the job.
    c) Give some resources to work with
    d) Less brick bats
    e) Don't reorganise and cull jobs every 18 months.
    f) Give a realistic expectation of what can be achieved from above - rather than fairy-land promises and no cash.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is there any relationship at all? Partners consult and agree, they don't dictate and they don't tell you off for raising prickly issues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Quite Sanjeev. What relationship do you have with an autocrat?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | Practice Manager12 Jul 2016 2:11pm

    Well said!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 9:06- Wish I could press a 'like' to that - as on FB.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.