This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

Revealed: GPs now in a majority on less than a third of CCG boards

Exclusive GP representation on CCG boards has substantially decreased since commissioning groups were in shadow form, with GPs now making up the majority of board members at just 29% of CCGs, new figures exclusively obtained by Pulse reveal.

The data, collected by the TUC-funded campaign group False Economy, is the most comprehensive analysis to date of the make-up of fully-fledged CCG boards. It reveals that GPs constitute some 43% of all board members - down from 49% in 2012 - and that the proportion of boards where GPs are in the majority has almost halved over the same period, from 56% to 29%.

Andrew Lansley, the health secretary who introduced the Health and Social Care Act, told GPs the original purpose of the reforms was to ‘give you and your colleagues in general practice the responsibility to shape services’.

But GP leaders have said that these latest figures support the growing feeling that CCGs are ‘more like PCTs, with strong managerial diktats’, at the same time as one of the country’s most senior GP commissioner leaders told Pulse that ‘centralism’ is threatening to ‘destroy’ primary care.

Researchers from False Economy began looking in December at the constitution of all 212 CCG boards, based on information on their websites, which CCGs must display. They recorded whether each board member was a GP, hospital doctor, manager, nurse, lay member, public health doctor or a pharmacist, and also counted members of the voluntary sector, local authorities and Healthwatch.

The researchers found that 1,343 of the total 3,120 CCG board members were GPs, and that GPs were in the majority of just 61 boards. After GPs, NHS managers - non-clinical CCG staff - were the next most widely represented group, making up 21% of board members. Nurses made up 7% of board members, and hospital doctors 6%.

NHS South Tyneside CCG was one of those to report that GPs were in a minority - it has only two GPs on a board of 12 members.

Dr Matthew Walmsley, chair of NHS South Tyneside CCG, said: ‘The GPs in our organisation are in positions where they can lead major change in South Tyneside. We built our constitution carefully to enable them to do that from outside our governing body. I believe that for a small CCG, our financial stability and increasing national recognition as innovators are indicators of the success of that approach.’

The findings represent a significant decrease in GP representation since a Pulse investigation in 2012 when CCGs were in shadow form. That investigation found GPs were in a majority on 56% of boards and made up 49% of board members overall.

A subsequent Pulse investigation in September 2013 found the proportion of board members had fallen to 43% but did not look at the number of boards where GPs were the majority.

Back in 2012, GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul - at that time a negotiator - said ‘we need to learn the lessons’ of PCT boards and ‘ensure the GP presence isn’t being diluted’.

This week LMC leaders responded with concern to the latest figures showing GP representation has decreased.

Dr Paul Roblin, chief executive of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire LMCs, said GPs were feeling increasingly less involved in the work of CCGs.

He said: ‘Month by month, CCGs feel less like bottom-up organisations and are becoming more like the old PCTs with strong managerial diktats.’

Dr John Canning, secretary of Cleveland LMC, said: ‘Many of the GPs I speak to are quite disillusioned by the CCGs’ agenda. We have not learnt the lessons from history… most GPs want to spend their time seeing patients.’

‘The part-time GPs at the top of CCGs seem swamped by the workload. Personally I don’t think commissioning is going very well.’

These figures come as Dr Michael Dixon, interim president of NHS Clinical Commissioners, told Pulse that there was a real risk NHS England’s heavy-handed approach to managing GP practices and the continued underfunding of the profession could undermine GPs’ will to take part in commissioning.

He said: ‘NHS England is not getting it, because it is not sufficiently connected with the hind brain, if you like, of your average GP or nurse. The vested interests of centralism and secondary care are the two things that threaten to destroy all we are trying to do with primary care commissioning.’

He added that the commissioning environment was ‘in danger of getting worse’ than under PCTs. He said: ‘All we have seen in the first year of NHS England commissioning is them paying the bills – or sometimes not paying the bills. What we have not seen is inventive commissioning.’

A spokesperson for NHS England said: ‘The role of CCG governing bodies is set out in legislation. There are no rules about a CCG having a majority of GPs on governing bodies, however, as clinically-led commissioning organisations, NHS England has required each CCG to appoint a clinical leader who is the individual recognised by the CCG as the leading clinician who represents the clinical voice of its members.’

Readers' comments (12)

  • I thought the whole point of pushing through the disruptive reorganization was so that 'those in the best position to make decisions were those that know the patients' i.e. GPs.

    How long until CCGs just have token GPs for rubber stamping?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It was quite obvious from the start of forming CCGs that PCTs closed down and all the mangers from PCTs came into CCGS from the backdoor.So far Mr.Cameron has done nothing to reform NHS other than introducing more walk-in-centres, more PCTS under the name of CCGs, destroying GPs moral, increasing paperwork ,reducing hardworking GPs income when increasing MPs income!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 43% GPs, 21% Managers, 13% Nurses & Hospital doctors.

    The other 23%??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    'There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies and statistics '
    About time all GP commissioners in CCG to consider a non co-operative movement . Think about all of you just walk out same time same day..........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Who cares, Hunt still controls it all. All just a pointless reshuffle with a £3bn price tag.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Mustapha Tahir

    Not a surprise at all!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's been great watching our PCT appoint "mates" to the board, who appoint mates to work in the organisation.
    Those on the outside are worse off than in the PCT era - at least they were democratic and not cronyism.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 7:01 pm. I couldn't agree more. And the breathtaking nepotism of some of the contracts that have been awarded is unbelievable.

    It is quite instructive to look at the GP board members of different CCGs, and note how utterly homogenous they are - the vast majority are men, which clearly doesn't represent general practice. In any one CCG they will be almost all of one racial group, in the next door one, a different racial group, but still all the same as each other. To break into a CCG if you don't fit the mould is impossible.

    We are worse off than we were under PCTs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I resigned from our CCG board, and clinical "lead" as it seems I was just there to rubber stamp the COOs "great" ideas, yet again.
    Bring ideas that are not his ideas and you are labelled as some weirdo GP.
    Doesn't matter how good the evidence is, your going to be ignored.
    Anonymous as I don't want the come back, again.
    20years of wasting my time, taxpayers money and patients lives.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In my CCG, practically everyone attending is a GP so I have to ask the question, whilst they spend all day in meetings (at least ten of them) who cares for their patients?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say