Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS chiefs spend £1.2m on publicity drive to expand use of personal health budgets

Exclusive NHS managers are spending more than £1m on the drive to get CCGs to offer more people personal health budgets despite ongoing concerns about how they will affect the health service, Pulse has learned.

NHS England’s personal health budgets delivery plan for this year – obtained through a request under the Freedom of Information Act – detailed spends, totalling £1.18m, on various initiatives that included a round of workshops for CCGs and a pilot for developing business cases at 12 sites.

GP leaders questioned why managers were spending this figure on rolling out personal health budgets (PHBs) at a time when the NHS is running a huge deficit – and warned the Government’s long-term agenda was to use PHBs to cut services.

The delivery plan is part of NHS England’s drive to widen access to the budgets under its Five Year Forward View, which outlined that CCGs should ‘lead a major expansion’ of PHBs in 2015/16 and ‘include clear goals on expanding PHBs’ as part of their strategy.

CCGs have been expected to offer PHBs to patients receiving NHS Continuing Healthcare since last October, while NHS England also set out a commitment to extend the offer to anyone with a long-term condition who can benefit, from April this year.

In addition, this year more than 10,000 ‘high-need’ patients – including elderly people with long-term conditions, and people with serious mental illness – are being given a combined personal budget, covering both their health and social care services.

NHS England boss Simon Stevens has said more than five million people could be using such budgets for their NHS care by 2018.

Among the range of initiatives, the delivery plan included:

  • £235,000 to support CCGs to develop a local offer for PHBs beyond continuing care, including a series of five-day events across England.
  • £176,000 for 12 sites to develop business cases and commissioning models for PHBs.
  • £370,000 to develop a training programme for personal assistants.
  • £80,000 to train up the voluntary care sector to offer support and advice on PHBs.
  • £50,000 to publicise stories from people with PHBs to help learning. 

This comes despite concerns about the drive to continue rolling out personal budgets, after Pulse revealed that they were being used in some cases to buy non-evidenced based care such as aromatherapy, holidays and pedalo boating while existing, long-established services are being cut in order to set them up.

The BMA has callled for a review of the budgets as a result, while the chief executive of NICE has also said they need further evaluation before being rolled out more widely across the NHS.

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said the delivery plan raised questions about ‘this agenda and the clear pressure to expand [personal health budgets]’.

Dr Vautrey said: ‘At a time when the NHS has a £30bn deficit people should ask whether the reason the Government and NHS England are so keen on this is fundamentally about cutting costs, rather than truly empowering and improving services to patients.’ 

He added that while the budgets ‘might be superficially attractive to patients and carers, ultimately it’s a way of containing social and other costs associated with care in a way that may be less easy for NHS England to do under the current arrangements’.

Dr Vautrey said: ’People need to be aware of what that hidden agenda is – ultimately it means they can cut services that patients normally expect, but all of a sudden when they ask for them find they are no longer there’. 

NHS England refused to comment on the figures, but responded that patient Kevin Shergold said his budget was ’not a pot of money I’ve been given to spend however I see fit’ but ‘is agreed, accounted for and monitored by medical professionals’, while the budgets give patients ‘freedom to live our lives as we choose – in a way that’s sensible and cost effective’. 

Personal health budgets delivery plan – where the money is going

  • Supporting CCGs to develop a local offer for PHBs beyond continuing care, including series of five-day events across England – £235,000
  • Finance and commissioning support for 12 sites to develop business cases and commissioning models for PHBS - £56,000 (and up to £120,000 direct funding to sites)
  • Support to ensure successful delivery of PHBS to adults and children on NHS continuing healthcare / continuing care - £120,000
  • Develop learning materials and information on good practice - £10,000
  • Develop training programme for Personal Assistants – £370,000
  • Train up voluntary care sector to offer support and advice on PHBs - £80,000
  • Publish stories and blogs from people with PHBs to help support local and national development of PHBs - £50,000
  • Support for CCGs to offer people with learning disabilities PHBs (or joint budget) - £100,000
  • Support CCGs to deliver PHBs in line with relevant national policy, regulations and best practice - £10,000
  • Measuring progress - £30,000

Total - £1,181,000

Readers' comments (20)

  • This floater just will not flush away!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For that amount I could have offered a 7 day 8-8 service for a whole year. But propaganda and reflectors are more important for these spoilt rich kids from pedigreed families.The proletariat can perish as long as the NHSE lords can get their kids in lucrative private healthcare jobs in future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PHBs are a step in the right direction, that will empower patients and give them greater purchasing power, that will force, first and foremost, social service providers to compete for the business of looking after the patients directly with the recepient of the service rather than bid for e-bay style aqp's from various ccg's.

    Not sure what the gps are getting their knickers in a twist for as this barely concerns them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pulse still unable to differentiate between 'NHS managers'...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Practice Manager 10:49a.m
    You are not a practice manager.
    GPs work with evidence and not sensationalised nonsense like PHB.
    Evidence has shown that this does not work. If you have bothered to read about PHB, there are a lot of questions that remain unanswered.
    GPs are asking many questions about it because NHS needs £22 billion at least to remain solvent by 2020 and people like you think this is the time to try out non-evidence based schemes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • Anonymous | Practice Manager17 Nov 2015 10:49am

    Have you read the PHB document and are you familiar with Continuing healthcare? For a practice manager, you seem to be oblivious to these.

    In the days when NHSE is trying to tell us they cannot even fund general practice to keep level funding (apparently we should make efficiency savings to compensate for lack of increase in funding where as all other areas of NHS gets uplift), we are proposing to divert the money to fund your vision of empowerment. This will lead to less front line staff - less admin to answerphone calls, chase up paper work, deal with scripts, less clinicians to see patients etc.

    If you think this leads to better care (despite several researches to the contrary) and support it. Just don't complain if you have to wait 2 months to see a GP, 12 months to see a consultant and average AED waiting becomes 8 hours (already falling 4 hour target in case you didn't know)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This PM actually runs a Federation somewhere with the backing of LMC/CCG GPs and therefore has a louder and more audible voice than most of us in general practice. Don't mean though that she's talking sense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I work in this area in the West Midlands - the PHB's are taking up huge amounts of time to set up. Also the one's I have set up work out considerably more expensive than using traditional services. Relatives as paid carers can exaggerate how many hours of care are needed or hours they are alteady providing. Staff are too busy to monitor these packages - CCG's beware!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vautrey sees powers of control over budgets as well as individual decisions dwindling away...tuff.the services people want are no longer there anyway.......and as Kevin implies the person knows better than anybody else 'what is good for them'.not a health worker or a social worker although their input is welcomed if not attempting to simply control and save money..most of the posts are more to do with ignorance and loss of control than concerns about health care.practice manager is spot on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11.55am...yes sure everybody except you are out to milk systems.try being a carer rather than a paid nurse who goes off duty and gets paid pretty well for it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.