Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Private referral management service charges £10 per GP referral

GPs will have to seek permission from a privately-operated referral management service - who have the power to overrule them - as part of a CCG scheme to cut unnecessary outpatient appointments.

NHS North Durham CCG have signed a contract with private provider About Health, which employs NHS consultants and GPSIs to review referral letters at a price of £10 a time.

The ‘rapid specialist opinion’ (RSO) service is expected to take up to three working days to deliver a verdict on a referral, GPs have a right to appeal a decision, and can have a subsequent review by an independent consultant.

The CCG told Pulse the decision was taken on the basis that an unnecessary referral costs on average ‘around £150’ and said that outpatient appointments should usually be reserved for when ‘practice and community based solutions have been tried’.

GP leaders have condemned the plans as a ‘total disgrace’, and a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of general practice.

The RSO service will decide whether, based on CCG guidelines, a case should be referred to specialists in cardiology, gynaecology, dermatology, ENT, ophthalmology and gastroenterology – though additional specialties could be added in future.

Urgent cases and patients with suspected cancer are not sent through referral triage, and the CCG has confirmed that legal responsibility for clinical decisions made at triage will sit with the service.

An FAQ on the CCG website states: ‘The specialist team will provide clinical triage within two working days of the referral being sent, and then the outcome will be processed within one further working day.’

It continues that this will ‘sometimes be faster’ and that the CCG will monitor the process, but it does not ‘envisage this causing a delay in treatment.’

It states: ‘Where a GP disagrees with the decision they will have to submit a further referral challenging it, if the service again rejects their referral, the decision will then be considered by an ‘independent specialist.’

The BMA’s GP Clinical lead Dr Andrew Green told Pulse the service was a ‘mechanistic view of general practice’, and warned it was irresponsible to undermine the professionalism of GPs while the profession was struggling to recruit.

He added: ‘I personally think it’s a total disgrace, GPs are independent professionals, trained to a very high standard, and the decision to refer is made in consultation with the patient, when both patient and GP believe it’s in the best interest of the patient to do so.

‘To think that a consultant, however skilled they are in their specialty, has any understanding of the interaction that goes on prior to the outpatient appointment, displays a fundamental misunderstanding of general practice.’

A spokesperson for NHS North Durham CCG told Pulse: ‘The aim of this service is to ensure patients are receiving the most appropriate treatment for their condition in the most appropriate place. Hospital outpatient appointments should usually only be made when available practice and community based solutions have been tried.

’The specialists and consultants are NHS professionals from outside of the North Durham area contracted to work for "About Health". Referral letters will be looked at by consultants/specialists and are reviewed in the light of the agreed clinical guidelines.

'About Health have confirmed when a clinical decision is made at triage the responsibility sits with them and they have clinical negligence cover for this.'

City of Durham MP Roberta Blackman-Woods has said she will raise the issue in Parliament.

 

 

Readers' comments (30)

  • Vinci Ho

    Hang on a minute
    When a GP refers a patient to a specialist for a opinion. By default , this is for an opinion for management of the patient's medical condition NOT an opinion of whether the referral is justified or not .
    Medico-legally , the name rapid specialist opinion (RSO) is NOT the opinion serving the purpose of the referral system in place. Somebody is trying to break the rule here!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's never been a better time to be a GP!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "This is the end, beautiful friend
    This is the end, my only friend, the end
    Of our elaborate plans, the end
    Of everything that stands, the end
    No safety or surprise, the end..."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Al,
    So private specialists who gained their consultant status on the NHS but work in the NHS elsewhere are paid £10 per letter to decide whether or not people should be alowed to attend NHS specialists clinics in Durham.

    The contract no doubt has performance targets?

    So not mixed incentives there then.

    Regards
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Referral gets bounced back? Just tell the patient to go to A&E.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "GPs are independent professionals" - very 20th century I'm afraid. GPs became clinicians which was pretty revolting but now we are mere "skilled workforce". This is an ineluctable process. It is amazing that law manages to hang on to its professional status.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What happens if a patient refuses consent for their clinical details to be sent to the RMC? Is there a patient opt out?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Guidelines are guidelines. As such they are reductionist simplifications and don't take into account the messy uncertainty and complexity of the patients in front of us. Anybody who works for this outfit should take this into account and their negligence cover will also need to take heed that hiding behind guidelines may not provide adequate cover.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Again easy soln.

    Ask patients to report gp/cons who has blocked referral to GMC.

    these schemes usually fail quickly, ensure good PR campaign against individuals who are vetting referrals!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • so how does a GP explain this to a patient? look I am not considered competent enough to refer you as I think appropriate -so unless you make a complaint right now and this is how to do it -and get referred very quickly you may die before you get a referral

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.