Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP appointments to be reserved for NHS 111 direct bookings under national scheme

Exclusive Commissioners are reserving a set proportion of GP appointments for NHS 111 direct booking following instruction from NHS England, Pulse has learned.

Under the NHS England instructions, at least 5% of all callers must be given the option of booking an in-hours GP appointment following contact with an NHS 111 clinician, if a GP appointment is deemed to be necessary.

CCGs have told Pulse that they have been asked to meet the 5% target by December 2017, with the target growing to 30% by April 2019.

NHS England has not confirmed how the target will be enforced, or whether there is any money attached to it, but it follows pilots elsewhere in the country that were set up to further NHS England's 'integrated urgent care' policy.

But GPs say there is still ‘skepticism’ over how NHS 111 direct booking to in-hours GP appointments will effect workload and any target will have to be included in this year's GP contract if it is to succeed.

NHS Windsor, Ascot and Maidenhead CCG told Pulse that rolling out NHS 111 direct booking has been made a national target set by NHS England.

A spokesperson said: ‘All CCGs are required by NHS England to have at least 5% of booking from NHS 111 into an in hours GP appointment by December 2017 and ultimately 30% by April 2019.’

Further explanation from the CCG revealed that ‘5% of all callers will have the option to book an in hours GP appointment following a contact with NHS 111 if a GP appointment is the most appropriate onward pathway’.

NHS England would not comment directly on the details of the national target, but responding to Pulse's inquiry, a spokesperson said: 'For those patients who call 111 and are assessed by a clinician (not just by a call handler) as needing a GP practice appointment it makes sense to be able to book that directly.

'The ability of a 111 GP, nurse or paramedic to accurately assess whether a person needs a practice appointment is likely to compare well with the alternative of an equivalent judgement having to be made by the practice's own receptionist, especially if this then occurs some time later when the patient may already have just decided to head to A&E.'

But Dr Nigel Watson, chief executive of Wessex LMCs, said that GPs are ‘wary’ about opening appointments to direct booking.

He said: ‘We’re short of appointments now and struggle to meet the demands, so the thought of just opening it up to another provider to directly book is not something at this stage that we would agree locally, I think it’s got to be a nationally negotiated agreement.’

He added that GPs are unlikely to open up their appointments as ‘there is nothing in my contract to allow direct booking’.

And Dr Simon Abrams, chair of Urgent Health UK, said: ‘There remains a lot of skepticism about how that’s going to work.’ 

He said the concern is largely around ‘holding sessions or appointments open to enable 111 to book, both in terms of being able to cope with the extra work and also the risk of the losing appointment slots if they’re not needed’.

However, he added that direct booking ‘does seem essential, it does seem part of making the service work for patients’.

NHS England launched a NHS 111 direct-booking pilot last year in the North-East of England but Pulse reported soon after the launch that NHS 111 call handlers were slow to fill appointments

Newcastle and North Tyneside LMC chief executive Dr George Rae has now told Pulse that only 25% of appointments reserved for NHS 111 are booked, with the rest going unfilled.

He said: ‘If my partnership is a reflection on the other partnerships - and normally that is the case - it’s not inordinately used but there is an availability there. 

‘We do, in our partnership, have three appointments per day and there is days when they are filled but there are days when they’re not filled.’

He added that the 25% fill rate has meant the workload is manageable but he said ‘the point is that if we reach the point where they are being filled all the time then it might be a different answer’. 

NHS 111: a history

NHS 111 has been a persistent thorn in GPs’ sides since it launched in 2013.

The system first replaced nurses with lay call handlers who follow a series of pre-programmed questions to triage patients and recommend a disposition. Former GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul had criticised the scheme for ‘disproportionately’ recommending patients go to their GP adding unnecessarily to practice workload.

Then as part of an NHS England bid to mitigate winter pressures in 2015, NHS 111 providers were told to recruit GPs to give advice to call handlers at peak times and boost the input from clinically trained professionals.

Matthew Swindells, NHS England’s director for operations, information and growth, later said that 80% of patients who would have been sent to the GP under NHS 111 guidelines could have avoided the visit if it was a GP that took their call.

This came as NHS England announced in March that one in three calls to NHS 111 will be assessed by a clinician under plans to ‘beef up’ the helpline.

Readers' comments (28)

  • Over my dead body - I presume they will just change the contract because at the moment this isn't possible to do without agreement. I also dont want NHS111 filling up my time with the dross or inappropriate work they currently try to get us to see

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bit sad after 25 years plus as GP and a personal list I'm incapable of triaging my own patients.

    And a Merry Xmas with monstrous knobs on to you too!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We will resist this as long as possible , a total misuse of OUR appointment systems.Once again NHS England interfering where they are not wanted

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No way matey,need to renegotiate contract and fund this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a waste of time. Most of the 111 stuff we see now is complete dross!!!!!!!

    If they start doing this - we could sent all our patients to 111 first

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This totally ignores the value of the receptionist who knows the local patients and can quickly make valuable judgements about the validity of the request and thus avoid using up appointments on trivia. Yet another example of non-GPs sticking their noses in where all they will do is make things worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Close the phones flood 111 with primary care workload, when we are full of dross we are full. Illthought out meeting diarhoea from the corrupt establishment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Knowledge is Porridge

    We have a walk in surgery, every morning at 9am and afternoon at 3pm. Often it is full. Today nobody has arrived...
    I couldn't believe how backwards it was when I came here. Now I cant believe nobody else does this any more.
    Telephone triage is not the future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks Nigel for going on the defensive on this issue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    You can not run an organisation like this from the top down ..but that’s what every new initiative represents. Someone up the organisational chain imposing a crass idea from on high like a government official in the old Soviet Union telling the factories how many tractors to construct each year. Why would 111 be better at allocating appointments that the practice that actually knows and registered it’s patients? This is just another symptom of a collapsing service. Idiocy. Almost everyday I hear news that confirms I am making the right decision to get out of this soul crushing job. I’m gone in January. Thank god.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say