Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP contraceptive services cut as councils target public health budgets

Exclusive Local councils in England are scaling back GP-run contraceptive and sexual health services under a new wave of cost-saving plans that GP leaders have warned will reduce access for patients and cut off an important funding stream for practices.

A Pulse investigation has found more than 20 local councils so far that are potentially taking away the services from GP practices.

This includes complete closure of GP-run sexual health and contraceptive services in York, while 19 London boroughs are putting services out to tender, which GP leaders warn will mean fewer practices carrying out the services.

Funding cuts in Devon also mean some practices are being forced to drop contraceptive services.

It comes after Pulse revealed practices are also losing smoking cessation services and NHS Health Checks contracts amid Government cuts to public health grants, which have already seen local authorities stripped of £200m this year, and from April facing further cuts averaging out at 4% a year for the next five years.

Family planning experts have been warning that cutting such services could end up costing the health service billions of pounds in the longer term, and 'reverse a decade of progress’ on training and access to contraception.

The councils changing their current sexual health service provision include:

  • York City Council, which told practices in December they would terminate long-running contracts for chlamydia screening and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) ‘with effect from 31 March 2016’, despite being ‘fully aware of the concerns in general practice ... and the impact this may have on the wider provision of women’s sexual health and gynaecological services in primary care’; 
  • Nineteen London boroughs, which are putting LARC contracts out to tender as part of the London Sexual Health Transformation Programme. This is due to ‘the continued squeeze on public sector finances, and specifically public health budgets’;
  • Devon and Torbay councils, which are cutting the number of LARC procedures GPs do to switch to a cheaper ‘nurse-led’ approach, meaning some practices will only be funded for six GP LARC fittings, with the rest paid for at a nurse hourly rate.

In London, the 19 boroughs are putting services out to tender.

Dr Andrew Howe, director of public health in Barnet and Harrow and programme director of the London Sexual Health Transformation Programme, said: ‘We are currently looking in detail at capacity and demand to help our planning but we would hope that more services will be provided in primary care settings in the future. As well as being convenient for many patients this will free up clinic and hospital time for complex cases.'

But Londonwide LMCs medical director Dr Tony Grewal warned 'the provider is not intended to be GP and it is unlikely a GP practice or even a federation of GPs would be able to successfully bid for the service’.

He added: ‘This will diminish patient choice, limit access to these forms of contraception and diminish GPs’ professional competency to undertake these procedures... in terms of the service to patients and the skills resource available to [public health] in the future, there are huge risks in getting rid of what is actually a very cheap service’.

Dr Mark Sanford-Wood, medical secretary at Devon LMC, told Pulse that it meant some practices - particularly smaller rural ones - without enough trained staff would no longer be able to cover the costs of running the service.

Dr Sanford-Wood said: ‘ ‘The danger is, they will simply have to send those patients to local family planning clinics that are not really resourced for those kinds of volumes of patients and not as accessible – the geography of Devon really doesn’t lend itself to easy access to centralised services.’

Meanwhile, Dr John Crompton, chair of North Yorkshire LMC, told Pulse local GPs were continuing to fight the move as they were concerned it could lead to a rise in unplanned pregnancies – and would mean GPs and practice nurses trained in fitting implants and coils would lose their accreditation to offer the services in the future.

Dr Crompton said: ‘For practices that have invested a lot of time and effort in training in fitting long-acting contraception and coils, this was a time-consuming but significant income stream, people have taken on staff and work plans around that, and it’s just going to disappear.’

 

 

Readers' comments (19)

  • Vinci Ho

    No surprise
    The 'beauty' of devolution of power to local councils and the integration of social care and health care budgets. Public health and sexual health are pushed even further down the food chain......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Diminish patient choice" and "limit access." Like restricting the 'flu vaccination service? Or is that, like, totally different?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With promiscuity in vogue, it won't be long before the STI's catch up with the Council members too. Unimaginable syph in heads of local Councillors

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Pharmacist,

    Contraception includes emergency contraception which is available to pharmacies and GP practices ( as pill) and includes IUS fitting (Surgery or FP clinics) which are different from flu jab which is a planned procedure!!!
    Please don`t confuse the two.
    BTW soon you may find most small pharmacies will be closing due to EPS2 leading to only large chains surviving - don`t come running to GP`s to recommend you out either. We are both stuffed -best not to piss in the wind!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Short sighted in the extreme.We better get used to the good old days.Remind me what happened to Churchills dad again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very short sighted. Of course they think we will just keep providing [ esp LARC] from the goodness of our hearts. We will not for certain. No funding, no do. The local FPC's [ sorry, 'CASH' clinics ] wont be able to cope !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perfectly reasonable policy.Contraception is a luxury

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • False economy , short sighted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sexual health was underfunded when in the NHS ... Read Simon Stevens 5year plan
    The cost of unplanned pregnancy are huge and most end up at the door of councils. So short sighted.
    LARCs was removed from the QOF, now this.
    There is always a delay in the effect of changes like this hitting the statistics but I think we will see the falls in teenage pregnancy rates that we have seen levelling off or in some areas going up again when the stats come out in April.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | Pharmacist10 Feb 2016 9:51am

    We'd be happy for you to deliver flu jabs too if you will take on the administrative costs and get paid the same as us.

    This will hurt us both - any chance we can stand together as professionals for our patients?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.