Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Eight out of ten GP partners take pay cut as 2013/14 contract bites

Exclusive Some 83% of GP partners were forced to reduce their drawings in the first six months of working to the 2013/14 GP contract, with average take-home pay dropping by 7.9%, a Pulse survey has found.

The poll of 657 GPs, conducted in October last year, reveals that overall three in four GPs (75%) saw their pay fall after the new contract came into effect in April, with partners particularly badly affected.

Of the 502 partners surveyed, 414 (83%) said their earnings had fallen, while 12% said their pay had remained static and just 5% saw an increase. Some 8% of those polled said they had seen a pay cut of more than 20%, while the average net effect on partner pay was a 7.9% drop.

Sessional GPs fared somewhat better, with only 50% of salaried GPs and 57% of locums seeing a fall in pay. Although survey respondents were not asked to explain why their pay had fallen, these falls may reflect changes to tax and pension contributions as well as overall practice spending on sessional GP cover.

In England, the 2013/14 GP contract changes were imposed by the Department of Health after the GPC refused to accept demands which included an increase in QOF workload. The GPC also criticised the DH’s decision to disregard the DDRB’s call for a 2.29% funding uplift, with GPs having to settle instead for 1.32%.

GPC negotiator Dr Beth McCarron-Nash said she was ‘not surprised’ by the figures, which follow successive falls in GP earnings over several years.

‘We have seen general practice funding decreasing year on year,’ she said. ‘Set against what we are expected to achieve, this is deeply worrying.’

‘The [2013/14 GP contract] imposition has been an absolute disaster for general practice. We have had to jump through loads of hoops that we don’t feel are clinically approporiate and some of the imposed changes including the hike in QOF thresholds have been really damaging and are really difficult to achieve.’

Some changes brought in as part of the 2013/14 contract were reversed in the 2014/15 deal, but Dr McCarron-Nash said GPs would need to be ‘realistic’ about what negotiators could achieve for 2015/16.

‘The health secretary appears to acknowledge that more funding is needed in general practice but I don’t know how he intends to address that,’ she said. ‘I don’t think he will want to give us a whopping pay rise. We will, as ever, do our best to negotiate the best deal for GPs.’

Dr Kalal Sidhu, a GP in County Durham, said that some of the fall in GPs’ take-home pay could also be attributed to the widespread payments chaos after the handover from PCTs to NHS England.

Dr Sidhu said: ‘No one really knows who is meant to pay for the services that were historically paid through PCTs. This has resulted in cash flow problems which are extremely hard for small businesses to cope with. I do not see how practices can maintain their current incomes on their own. It is absolutely shameful that general practice remains grossly underfunded.

About the survey

Pulse launched this survey of readers on 15 October 2013, collating responses using the SurveyMonkey tool. The 26 questions asked covered a wide range of GP topics, to avoid selection bias on any one issue. The survey was advertised to readers via our website and email newsletters, with a prize draw for a Samsung Tab 2 tablet as an incentive to complete the survey.

As part of the survey, respondents were asked to specify their job title. A small number of non-GPs were screened out to analyse the results for this question. This question was answered by 657 GPs, of whom 502 were partners, 97 salaried GPs and 58 locums.

 

Readers' comments (44)

  • This reduction in real income is a real underestimate . Inflation is running at 2.7 % as far as we can tell over the last 10 years . This represents a 30% fall in actual recompense in face of rising demand for services . Inflation is a hidden tax on the population and cannot be ignored in calculation of reward for labour.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The drop in drawings is inspite of taking on additional work to supplement falling income.Also staff numbers are pared to the bone.
    Yesterday I had to do handman job of fixing something in the building as the NHS estates agency allows only aselect company to bid and they quoted nearly a grand to do a half an hour handman job which I did myself as we don`t have the money to pay him even if wanted to.
    This is so wrong in multiple levels.
    I haven`t put my name to prevent NHS estates agency from suing me for cost of lsot oppurtunity to rip us off!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    GP income (PMS & GMS) peaked in 2005/06 and has been in gradual real terms decline since then. The decline will continue further. Spending on primary care has fallen as a proportion of the overall NHS budget and there is a continuing squeeze on NHS spending.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • $75bn per month is still being created in the US . Inflation will increase .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A perfect storm for primary care,what will happen to the already poor recruitment situation as incomes decrease?We all know that one,The politicians choose to ignore whats happening.What a mess.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There should be a cut in services to match the cut in funding. Why should General Practice continue to shield the public from government cuts?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • aah..poor GPs.I wonder how'll they survive now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • >aah..poor GPs.I wonder how'll they survive now.

    I suspect you'll be first to complain when this leads to fewer appointments and you can't get some 'biotics' for the 2h long viral sore throat that meant you couldn't possibly get to work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm not convinced pay is the main reason for the GP recruitment issue. recruitment was an issue at the peak of GP earnings so it is more complicated than that.

    The big drops in income will be over the next few years with the changes to PMS etc.

    we did some modelling last year which suggested a 30% drop in core earnings (excluding dispensing) over the next five years

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Between January 2011 and July 2013, we had 3 cuts of partner drawings - some 12% in total. Sadly, we also had to make number of redundancies, no pay reviews for 3 years now, reduction in spend and I am astonished how short-sighted people are. We knew this was coming and it was a matter of a survival.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say