This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

GPC calls on CQC to halt plans to overhaul GP practice monitoring process

The GPC has voiced 'significant objections' to the CQC's new process for calling out GP practices on questionable safety performance.

The CQC is imminently planning to replace its current 'intelligent monitoring' process with its so-called 'GP Insight' process – with GPs due to get sight of a report on their practice next month.

But the GPC said the new monitoring system, which will see the CQC produce an ‘insight report’ for each practice, using metrics such as prescribing data and patient reviews, risked being misinterpreted by patients and the media and could act as an 'informal QOF' at a time when this type of workload has been deliberately scaled back.

In a letter to chief inspector of general practice Professor Steve Field, GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said it was clear that despite recent meetings, the GPC's concerns had not been addressed.

Dr Nagpaul’s letter raises several concerns about the GP Insight process, particularly that while the reports formed as part of this will not constitute ‘regulatory judgements on performance’, they will be interpreted as such by practices ‘and more importantly by patients and the wider media’.

The letter also raises concerns about the provision of context about the data, the use of z-scores meaning that half of practices will be below average, giving ‘a skewed impression of the achievement by the profession’, and that these measures ‘are likely to represent a form of informal QOF’, when that process is being ‘scaled back by common consent'.

Dr Nagpaul goes on to urge Professor Field to 'halt any plans to distribute GP Insight reports to practices in their current form and ask that you reconsider the overall approach to the use and publication of general practice data that can so easily be misinterpreted'.

The CQC told Pulse that GP practices can expect to receive their individual practice reports next month, and will get a chance to verify data before the report is published.

Professor Field said: 'In our strategy for the next four years CQC has committed to provide a more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach to regulation, so that more people get high quality care at the same time as reducing the burden on providers.

'One of our priorities is a greater use of data to determine changes in quality and to help guide our regulatory approach. GP Insight does not determine the judgement we make of a practice’s quality, it is there to inform it.

'As part of this approach, we will produce an individual Insight report on each GP practice, which brings together existing national data in one place. We are planning to send the individual reports out to GP practices next month to allow them to verify the data before it is published.'

Professor Field added that the CQC has been 'working closely with the BMA and RCGP about our approach to this new model and we will continue to talk to GPs about this process'.

CQC's 'intelligent monitoring' of GP practices

Speaking in December, Ruth Rankine, the deputy chief inspector of general practice, said GP Insight programme will allow the CQC to inspect practices only when they have concerns and may result in a phone call rather than an inspection.

The GPC's letter comes as the GPC was forced to call on CQC to withdraw misleading GP practice data from the CQC website back in 2014, when its intelligent monitoring scheme was first launched.

At the time, GPs found themselves battling to preserve the trust of their patients after the CQC published its internal risk rating scores for practices across the country.

Readers' comments (7)

  • Sorry Chand. No deal possible.
    Field almost certainly on a promise of a gong from Hunt.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A 'Field' day on a 'Hunt'.......Purge coming on ???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All this is just so so depressing when the profession desperately needs a real lift.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    Professor Steve Field is on a mission to destroy General practice, and all his fancy ideas of using patient feedback etc are a fantasy stick to beat GP practices with in a time of declining services and cutbacks.

    When you can't refer for varicose vein surgery who are they going to complain about?

    Its the GPs fault they are not given antibiotics, told to buy calpol and emollients OTC, not referred due to low priority procedures for all things not life threatening, no IVF, told they are fit to work when they want to be signed off long term.

    While we act as gate keepers for the NHS, we are the bad guys and whipping boys for JH and the DOH.

    We are caught between CCG monitoring of us and accused or poor performance against their cost controlling matrices, or Prof Fields CQC patient and performance management.

    No wonder many GPs voting with their feet and leaving/retiring, leaving the rest wondering which direction they are going to be clobbered from next.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Healthy Cynic

    Come on 'Steve'. Haven't you had the opportunity to 'reflect' upon your previous use of practice data and the effects of publishing it. Your reflection might remind you that it was a massive cock-up last time. Why are you determined to repeat your mistakes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another nail in the coffin of general practice

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another shot in the back to the troops on the front line.Thanks commissar Field.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say