This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Government proposes to shorten training for doctors post-Brexit

The BMA has warned that proposals to shorten training for doctors post-Brexit ‘would be a mistake’ and put ‘patient safety at risk’.

The warning comes after health minister Stephen Barclay told the Telegraph that doctors could be fast-tracked through training after Brexit in an effort to tackle staff shortages. 

The latest Pulse survey revealed that GP vacancy rates have rocketed to the highest level ever recorded, with one in six positions unfilled, according to a major Pulse survey last month

But in a letter to the minister the BMA said that moving forward the ‘point of registration’ would ‘seriously dilute the quality of our current training programmes’.

EU regulations currently require medical students to have at least five years of medical training before they are registered but after Brexit, the UK will be able to set its own length of training for doctors.

Mr Barclay said: ‘There are opportunities that come with Brexit - not to lower regulatory standards we want to maintain standards - to look at how we make things more bespoke to UK needs.’

He added: ‘There is scope to increase the number of doctors and the number of clinicians. It is not just doctors because what we need in the NHS is a wider skills mix.

‘At the moment you don’t qualify as a doctor when you leave medical school - you have to do a further year and that brings with it some additional costs.’

Mr Barclay suggested that the money saved ‘could be reinvested into training more medical students’.

But the BMA wrote to Mr Barclay to warn against his proposals, which suggested fully registering a doctor after their undergraduate study, instead of after FY1.

The letter said: ‘Under provisional registration, the first year of the foundation programme provides vital opportunities for medical graduates to participate in and to provide diagnoses and treatment under close supervision. 

‘This cannot be matched by current clinical placements in medical school. It allows graduates to learn through experience and to increase their confidence in their abilities.

‘It also creates significant opportunities for trainers to identify and support trainees who may be struggling with their clinical responsibilities.’

BMA representative body chair Dr Anthea Mowat, called the proposal an ‘ill thought out scheme’.

She said: ‘Training doctors takes time and experience. Patients want to be seen by a doctor who can provide them with the best possible care. 

‘Reducing their training time so that junior doctors have less expertise and less support than the current system provides will not achieve this.’

House of commons health committee chair Sarah Wollaston MP also criticised the idea that EU regulations were holding UK policymakers back on shortening doctors’ training.

Ms Wollaston tweeted: ‘This is rubbish, faster post-grad courses already exist for those who have relevant degrees. It’s not a #Brexit dividend to have worse training for doctors fgs. What planet are these straw clutchers on?’

The latest official statistics revealed that the number of FTE GPs in the workforce has decreased more than 1,000 since September 2015 - when health secretary Jeremy Hunt announced he would increase the number of FTE GPs in England by 5,000.

How long should GPs spend in training?

The length of time GPs should spend in training has long been debated, with an extended four-year training an RCGP priority for years

It was even backed by health secretary Jeremy Hunt until 2014 when realisation of the scale of the workforce crisis saw ministers kick plans into the long grass.

In 2017, a group of experts on the Shape of Training steering groupargued instead in favour of a more flexible 'three plus one' model, which would include a one-year fellowship scheme.

The RCGP said last year it would continue lobbying for extended training and HEE backed further discussion over extending GP training to four years in its 10-year workforce plan published in December 2017.

But this all comes against the backdrop of a severe workforce shortage in general practice, with health secretary Jeremy Hunt confessing earlier this month that he is ‘struggling to deliver’ his pledge for 5,000 additional GPs by 2020.

Readers' comments (14)

  • Google search vs medical degree? Cheapest option always wins.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Better get rid of the CSA - they will have no chance

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Desperate measures indeed, chuck troops into the front lines with inadequate training and equipment.I feel we are losing this war HMG.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think its a marvellous suggestion. Bravo Mr Barclay.

    BUT.....I also believe that airline pilots do not need 1500 hours experience before being allowed to become fully-fledged commercial pilots- another example of the interference of outsiders doing their damnedest to hold Britain back. And the crazy rules around inspecting nuclear powerstations… I could go on.

    What Mr Barclay intends is to allow a smaller pool of highly resilient individuals to arise at the end of training who show their mettle by surviving the job. Admittedly there will be casualties lost along the way but if we are to build a Britain that will stand strong and alone in this world this is a small but inevitable price to pay.

    Right-enough pontificating. Let me get back to my copy of Mein Kampf.(/s)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "What Mr Barclay intends is to allow a smaller pool of highly resilient individuals to arise at the end of training who show their mettle by surviving the job"

    I didn't choose medicine as a career to merely survive. I want to thrive and be happy in it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Come to our university, become a doctor. You'll survive the trenches of understaffed wards and emerge a miserable human being who spends the rest of their days on Pulse"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP training would be improved by -

    1. Spending less time as hospital rota-fodder and more time in General practice.

    2. Dumping the fatuous e-Portfolio.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shorter training? Don't forget the manslaughter charges waiting for you if things go wrong. Can it be pinned on inadequately trained and inexperienced doctor?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All the Mail readers know more than GPs already. They can do all the Skype e-consultations straight away. £100k for a few hours doing virtually nothing then playing golf! Recruitment problem solved and no need for med schools.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Training is a means to an end,and not an end in itself.As the article notes, changes to the duration of training have been debated for years.Surely there should be nothing sacrosanct about duration of training, not least since the content has also changed radically over time.
    Interestingly, my consultant colleagues expect training to improve after Brexit, when the European Working Time Directive no longer applies(and I am well aware of the trade off between experience gained by seeing more patients versus potential hazards from fatigue).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say