This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

The docbot will see you now

GP trainees locked out of MRCGP exam could get 'sixth' attempt

Exclusive The RCGP is considering adding a further sixth attempt at its end of training Clinical Skills Assessment for doctors who have been locked out of general practice by being unable to complete the final exam.

The RCGP told Pulse it was considering the changes in conjunction with education bosses’ plans for a ‘Targeted GP Training’ (TGPT) programme to support doctors unable to pass the CSA or changing specialty.

Black and minority ethnic doctor representatives said requiring trainees to pay ‘almost £2,000’ for another retake did nothing to address fundamental issues with the exam which mean non-white doctors are much less likely to pass.

But the BMA’s GP trainee committee was more hopeful, saying that the individual education support package in the programme could be the difference, rather than ‘doing the same thing over and over again.’

Tthe RCGP only allows four attempts but in August 2016 began allowing a fifth ‘in exceptional circumstances’.

Dr Ramesh Mehta, chair of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO), said that College representatives were receptive to the idea of allowing failed CSA candidates toretake the exam after been locked out of training in a meeting last week. 

He told Pulse: ‘They said that there is a possibility that the number of attempts, which is four at the moment [with a fifth in exceptional circumstances], is going to go up to six.'

However, he said that the RCGP continued to insist that BAPIO's proposed changes to its exam, such as providing video feedback to unsuccessful applicants or using two examiners to correct for bias, were ‘too expensive’.

Dr Mehta added: 'The amount of money they charge for these exams is nearly £2,000 and these poor trainees pay every attempt. But they [the RCGP] are saying their exam is making a loss.’

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said changes to the exam are ‘unlikely to be implemented’ before it has heard back independent review of the MRCGP’s first ten years – as revealed by Pulse.

The College meets regularly met BAPIO and others to ensure ‘all elements of the assessment remain fair to all candidates’ and she added: ‘During our last meeting with BAPIO, the possibility of further attempts at the Applied Knowledge Test or Clinical Skills Assessment was discussed in the context of potential Targeted GP Training proposals being considered by HEE – but until these are published we are not in a position to make any decisions or comments.’

GPC education, training and workforce lead Dr Krishna Kasaraneni told Pulse that ‘simply adding more and more attempts isn’t going to serve a purpose’.

‘I’ve spoken against it before, because what's the point of doing the same thing again and again without extra support or added focussed training.

’But this scenario is looking at people who have been unsuccessful in the past and have used up all their attempts but putting them through the targeted training programme and giving them a chance to get through the assessment.’

The TGPT programme is working to identify how many GPs could benefit having failed before, but Pulse revealed last year that RCGP records showed around 400 doctors had hit the maximum attempt threshold.

The talks between BAPIO and the RCGP follows a High Court challenge by the association three years ago which ruled the College’s exam was lawful but that action was needed to address the gap.

But last week Pulse revealed that the College’s own figures show it is the widest ever recorded in the MRCGP qualification’s ten-year history.

 

Readers' comments (26)

  • Tom Caldwell

    The statistics on your chance of passing at a six attempt were... catastrophically bad. These were candidates who had intensive extra help and input. How is this different to the previous farce of six attempts.

    It seems like an expensive way to destroy more souls.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The trouble is that too many trainees having failed once rush into entering the next exam. Practice "textbook" cases with a ghetto of other overseas graduates and don't listen to their trainees saying what they need to change. I have seen it time and time again. It's often not their knowledge although the AKT results aren't fantastic often because nuances are missed and speed isn't excellent.It isn't their work ethic either which is usually excellent. However my experience is that if not passed by 6th attempt then often truly aweful

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why have an exam at all eh?!! Jesus wept.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    (1)'To help the weak and aid the needy' . I am not the most religious person but I think that is one of teachings of Jesus Christ , isn't it , Helen?
    (2) 'Too expensive ' to have video recordings and two examiners . Seriously, money is really the most important argument here?
    (3) Then a good breakdown of how the money ,acquired from examination fees and continuing membership , was spent should be published. Transparency, please .
    Yes , you can call me a anti-establishment demagogue,(can't be more worse than Trump anyway).......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The stats on the gap of attainment between White UK entrants and 'the rest' is truly staggering. Surely an exam that discriminates so much against minorities has no place in the 21st century?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • re Sunshine 4.10- about as ill-informed as it is possible to get.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm getting a bit sick of this. Look at the statistical analysis freely available on the results of the MACHINE MARKED AKT.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems to be the CSA where people fall down. We've had a number of reasonable candidates fail and a high court judge expressed concerns even though the BAPIO case was not a technical 'win.' Why is it ill-informed to point out discrimination where it is obviously occurring?

    This is a controversial and unpopular exam. Even if you can explain the foreign candidates failure rate on cultural differences that doesn't really do it for the UK BME group. The MRCGP needs reforming and replacing with something that is more suitable to the well documented challenges of modern general practice where the government's consumer agenda is wreaking havoc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it takes you more than five attempts to pass this pathetic exam you should probably quit medicine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vote of no confidence in RCGP long overdue

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say