This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

The docbot will see you now

Medical schools 'should have funding linked to producing GPs'

Medical schools ‘have a responsibility’ for addressing the GP workforce crisis and should have their funding linked to their achievement of targets on number of GPs produced, a study led by a senior Government advisor has concluded. 

The study - ‘A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors’, published in BMC Health Services Research - also found that advertising campaigns to attract junior doctors to general practice have been detrimental in some countries.

In its review of 51 studies, the paper highlights that few government interventions to increase GP recruitment – many of which are being implemented as part of the NHS’s ten-point plan for GP workforce – are supported by robust evidence.

GP leaders have said the paper shows that one-off interventions are not going to solve general practice’s ongoing workforce crisis, and that the best advert for the profession is investment so trainees see it as an attractive place to work.

The study was authored by Sir Sam Everington, chair of NHS Tower Hamlets CCG and an adviser to NHS England, and Professor Amanda Howe, vice-chair of the RCGP, among others.

It published figures revealing that fewer than 10% of graduates from Oxford and Cambridge universities went on to a career in general practice.

Health education leaders are currently conducting a review into medical school culture, and the report authors urged the Government to link funding to universities’ output.

The study concluded: ‘Medical schools have a responsibility to start taking notice of the workforce crisis in primary care and perhaps resources and funding for these universities should be based on output to meet targets.

‘Universities should be held accountable as to how much time they allocate to the primary care setting and this data should be made publically available.’

The review also found:

  • that an advertising campaign to recruit GPs in the USA had a negative effect on potential candidates, with half of those who watched the video opting for a career in general practice compared with those who didn’t watch it.
  • there could be benefits from offering additional postgraduate training in under doctored areas;
  • ‘mixed results for the use of financial incentives’, such as golden handshakes, which it said was most effective in trainees ‘who had existing links to the underserved area’;
  • that there was widespread failure to effectively evaluate the outcome of interventions with few studies employing effective comparison groups, and no randomly controlled trials on the subject.

Many of these incentives formed part of Health Education England and NHS England’s ten-point plan.

HEE are currently offering £20,000 to more than 100 junior doctors willing to train as GPs in areas like Cumbria, while it last year ran a disastrous promotional video that highlighted extra-contractual work signing sky-dive forms as a reason to be a GP.

The chair of the GPC’s education, training and workforce subcommittee, Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, told Pulse: ‘The best marketing campaign, or strategy to improve GP recruitment is investing in general practice so the job is actually enjoyable for GPs to do. It isn’t for the majority, if not all of us.’

‘When that happens, when medical students come and spend time in general practice they will see a profession they want to join. It doesn’t matter what else you tell them, unless they see it and experience it themselves it’s not going to change.’ 

A HEE spokesperson told Pulse: ’No one intervention is going to make the difference. HEE and partners in NHS England, RCGP and BMA GPC are working together on many fronts including the 10 point plan initiatives to make recruitment flexible whilst maintaining standards and other measures to enhance the GP workforce.’

Tackling toxic medical schools

Maureen Baker-RCGP 2014-Online-cropped-(c) Rachael Meyer

Maureen Baker-RCGP 2014-Online-cropped-(c) Rachael Meyer

Pulse has already shown that medical schools are beginning to recognise the problems with primary care teaching.

Earlier this year Pulse revealed that the Medical Schools Council and Health Education England (HEE) would launch a review on the ‘profile of the GP culture’ in medical schools.

This comes after RCGP chair Maureen Baker attacked the ‘toxic’ anti-GP attitudes in some UK universities at the RCGP annual conference, and top GPs reported senior staff warning students not to ‘fail and become GPs’.

 

Readers' comments (25)

  • so their going to pay the rubbish med schools more? More bullshit

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @10:29

    I like your "shouty" message and agree wholeheartedly with you.

    Discussing what percentage of medical students train in primary or secondary care seems a little futile against the current conditions where many of us are demoralised and are look at ways to get out of this awful broken NHS system.

    There is very limited money available for public sector spending according to the treasury. It is NOT going to ever match what is needed for a high quality NHS service in terms of keeping both the workers and the public happy.

    As Johann Malawanna states: The U.K. has 2 choices. 1. Cut services in healthcare to fit budget. 2. Provide the budget to fit healthcare we want. Honest debate is needed

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't think it's just a problem with recruiting trainees or retaining senior GPs, it's also that many Gp Registrars who complete their GP training won't take up a full time GP job if at all these days. I know two colleagues who plan to quit medicine after they complete their GP training and another colleague who plans to enter another training program when he completes his GP training.

    With General Practice being the complete load of rubbish it is at the moment with phenominal responisbility, high risk, high stress, long hours for very very very little return I have almost zero interest in joining the GP workforce.

    Unfortunately I see no solution to this apart from the government putting a lot more money into primary care to provide extra services and staff to take some of the load of GPs, but this is never going to happen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • who comes up with this nonsense. blame the government for all the probelms, not the medical schools. Doctors are not idiots, they know what is going. simple things first
    1) stop appraisal and revalidation
    2) ban cqc
    3) stop press pr against doctors
    4) get rid of hunt
    5) pay doctors per patient seen (like the rest of world)
    6) take government interference out of General practice.
    7) have a limit to what is safe - 25-30 patients maximum

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So nobody thinks that actually improving General Practice as a career is a good idea?

    Really?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You can not push graduates to General practice through the back door. A graduate can only choose General Practice if he or she sees flexible working practices, no weekends, good pay, low workloads and good quality consultations - no trivia etc etc.

    Mr Hunt is making sure this is not possible, not in "his NHS".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Things are terrible now, but are about to become much worse.. Welcome to the new salaried low income GP production line working for a PLC. No continuity of care. No small team working. The job of the new 200,000 patient GP mega practice broken down to different departments..

    1/ Telephone consultations from angry patients wanting to be seen and having to limit their demands
    2/ Seeing huge numbers of angry patients demanding everything and having to deal with patients who do not fit the protocol e.g. for a brain CT for their headache that started that morning with no red flags...
    3/ On going round of QoF..
    4/ On going reading and acting on letters from hospital
    5/ Complaints dept
    6/ HR, commissioning, education updating
    7/ Home visits
    8/ Reading and acting on investigations.

    Imagine doing this for 200,000 patients as one minor cog for the rest of your life. Where is the enjoyment in that?

    Doctors used to pick general practice because they had a degree of autonomy and could work with a team that they picked, got to know and trusted. Patients respected them. Workload was manageable. There was time to socialise among the team. Pensions were good. It felt like an extended family.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • more lambs to the slaughter !

    there is so much choice for ambitious young scientists - why destroy your life ?

    look at Elon Musk, Steve Jobs, Criag Venter etc

    it's an exciting time to be in science but medicine ? it's no fun being a political football, a dump sink for all the problems that society doesn't want to deal with, and the convenient scape-goat for politicians and the media. Until the system collapses and we have something sensible in place - I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I heard an interview by one of the Profs at Harvard Medical School that he was proud that not a single student went into family medicine that year.General Practice is no career for an intelligent person and more should be done to deter them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My son is finishing his final year at Cambridge and is very unlikely to become a GP.
    But it is probably because his mum and dad are both NHS GPs and tell him not to!
    And he isnt stupid.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say