This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Over 40% of doctors lost after foundation year training

There has been a dramatic fall in the number of doctors who go on to train as GPs and specialists following their foundation year, with only six out of 10 choosing to continue training. 

UK Foundation Programme Office (UKFPO) figures reveal that just 59% of medical graduates who completed their foundation year 2 went on to work in hospitals or as GPs following the completion of the course in 2014, down from 71.4% in 2011.

The survey covered over 6,980 foundation doctors in 2014, representing 95% of all F2s completing foundation training.

It is the latest blow to Health Education England’s attempts to entice medical graduates into a career in general practice – despite claims of an increase in applications for the third round of training this year.

Pulse revealed earlier this week that there have been fewer applications to medical schools for the second year running.

GP leaders said that the recent figures reflected the uncertainty felt by younger doctors about a career in medicine.

UKFPO’s figures were published in response to a parliamentary question asked on 2 November by Dr Daniel Poulter, former health minister and MP for Central Suffolk and Ipswich, who asked what proportion of doctors left foundation training and entered training posts between 2008 and 2015.

Junior health minister Ben Gummer revealed that 71% went on to become doctors in 2011, 67% in 2012, 64% in 2013 and 59% in 2014.

He added that the survey was a ‘fairly accurate predictor of the destination of doctors who have completed foundation training’ but was not intended as an ‘accurate employment record’.

This follows the report earlier this week that showed the total number of UK students applying for places at medical school has fallen for the second year running, dropping by 13.5% compared with two years ago.

GP academic leaders said that the drop was ‘too large’ to be put down to chance and said that the fall in interest had been driven by ‘negative publicity’ around problems with funding, seven-day working and consultant and GP contracts.

Meanwhile, half of GP training places remain vacant in some areas of the country.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ’It is clear that young doctors are really unsure what the future holds for them, with huge uncertainty being created by Government policy. Few are going to commit to general practice or even the wider NHS until they start to hear that the Government is listening to their concerns.

’Bright young sixth-formers will also be seeing this and with pay and pension cuts, together with unreasonable expectations on working hours it’s no surprise if they start to shun medicine and look at alternative careers.’

Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, chair of the GPC’s education, training and workforce subcommittee, added: ’I want to know what the secretary of state is going to do to change the above trend. Simply devolving the responsibility to HEE and undermining the whole profession with the threat of imposing a contract on junior doctors, the future of our profession, is definitely not the right way.’

A Health Education England spokesperson said: ’A further piece of work is required to determine what percentage of doctors return to training after one or two years out.’

Readers' comments (22)

  • A good proportion will return but a significant number won't. And that is not surprising. These young doctors are the most talented and most motivated people of ther generation. I have had some foundation doctors attached to my practice who were quite frankly not just stunningly bright but also stunningly well organised and all round competent. Some of them were being wooed by the city with offers of much bigger salaries as well as respect for their talents and their team working skills. Until the Department of Health is able to demonstrate similar respect then these very able young people with internationally desirable attributes will walk and I for one wouldn't blame them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Over 40% of doctors lost after foundation year training"


    PULSE, please do not use Tory propaganda tools.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • re " |Anonymous | Sessional/Locum GP|13 Nov 2015 10:29am

    "Over 40% of doctors lost after foundation year training"


    PULSE, please do not use Tory propaganda tools.

    -Eh? Why would the Tories want any more bad headlines?? I am going to assume you're a pretty hardcore socialist who thinks the Tories are the root cause of all things bad - but really? Why on earth would they want this headline? Please don't let your political prejudices hamper your thought process to this degree.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Tory-style propaganda". Is that clearer?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • re " |Anonymous | Sessional/Locum GP|13 Nov 2015 10:29am

    - are you are not smoking something?!! no it is not clear even to me what you are implying.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It would be interesting to know at 5 years how many doctors who trained in the UK are still working in the UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As an outside observer the profession in general is pretty miserable (for whatever reason) and you can see why bright young things might look at other industries.

    The article trots out banking as an alternative but this is old hat - the really interesting area is tech. A chance to do really interesting work, no time serving, positive culture, chance to make a lot of money etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sad. Very sad statistics. Is anyone looking into this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Undergraduates should get their medical degrees and migrate or go for MBAs or other lucrative professions. Just like Bankers turned Doctors occupying top positions in NHSE and ruining the system from within like those termites that can destroy a 100 year solid oak.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some people are dumb ( in a Matter Texas accent ) . 40% is probably the percentage of foundation programme trainees that do not enter ST1 immediately. It does not necessarily mean they did not re-start trading following a break the following year. Fiddling with statistics is a Tory speciality eg 16% rise in death rates for patients admitted at weekends. PULSE has done the same by throwing a 40% figure implying it's a quit rate for foundation doctors.
    And for clarity, I ain't smoking nothing but it sounds like you are.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say