This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

RCGP meets with medical school heads to discuss 'toxic anti-GP' culture in universities

The RCGP is meeting with medical school heads to discuss the ‘toxic anti-GP culture’ in universities, which has to be addressed before the gaps in GP postgraduate training can be fixed, RCGP chair Dr Maureen Baker has said.

Responding to a question about low morale in the profession affecting whether medical graduates want to study general practice at a session during the RCGP conference in Liverpool last week, Dr Baker said that she had raised the issue of a ‘toxic anti-GP culture’ medical schools in meetings with officials.

She said that evidence suggests that students go in to medical schools with positive feelings about general practice, but this is gone by the time they leave.

It comes as GP training is in the middle of a recruitment crisis, with Health Education England falling well short of targets for recruiting GP trainees, and some parts of the country failing to fill up to 40% of places for this year’s intake.

Dr Baker’s comments follow statements by the chief executive of NHS England, Simon Stevens, who told the same conference that the rates of Oxford and Cambridge universities graduates taking up general practice was low, and called on GPs to rectify this by helping to ‘make more of the folks you teach at Cambridge more interested in taking it up’.

Similarly, last year the then chair of the GP National Recruitment Office, Professor Bill Irish, told Pulse that top universities in the country are not doing enough to produce future GPs and are adding to a recruitment crisis in the profession, while a taskforce on GP training recommended that medical schools were incentivised to produce GPs.

The RCGP chair said that she the college will be putting together evidence to discuss the issue of the culture in medical schools before meeting with the Medical Schools Council.

Dr Baker said that she had raised the issue of a ‘toxic anti-GP culture’ in meetings with education leaders.

She said: ‘There were quite a lot of colleagues who thought that was an astonishing thing to say and that it must have been years ago and that it was not like that anymore. I said that actually it was still like that and indeed we did have evidence.

‘The head of the Medical Schools Council has formally asked for a meeting to discuss this issue and we will be putting together evidence and looking at the published literature.

‘Evidence suggests that when students go into medical school, they are very positive about general practice, and when they come out of the other end, they are not. So what is going on?’

She added: ‘It will be part of how we move our campaign on, in terms of tackling attitudes to medical school.’

A taskforce review from July this year - led by GP postgraduate deans, having been commissioned by the Department of Health - called for medical schools to review their output of GPs.

It said: ‘The Medical Schools Councils should evaluate why there is such high variation between medical schools in the proportion of medical students choosing General Practice as a career:11% of students at Cambridge were appointed to GP training, compared to 39% at Keele.

‘Medical schools should be incentivised by the Department of Health to boost the proportion of graduates choosing GP training as a first choice.’

Mr Stevens last week said: ‘I was looking at the proportion of medical school graduates who choose to go into general practice and Oxford and Cambridge are amongst the lowest. A bit of a cheap jibe, perhaps, but one thing you could help us with is make more of the folks you teach at Cambridge more interested in taking it up.’

Readers' comments (40)

  • 5.13pm-AGREE!

    And PULSE-we must be allowed to comment on The Daily Mail's moral crimes without fear of "moderation" by PULSE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • The tragedy is that GP could still be a fantastic job but the RCGP are making things a lot worse. However you look at it you'd have to be mad to prefer GP at present:

    Workload - increasing to absurd levels
    Responsibility - increasing "see your GP"
    Criticism from the press and government - increasing
    Pay - decreasing at an alarming rate
    Risk of GMC and legal complaints - increasing
    control over working environment - increasing

    General practice is on it's knees. As a medical student you'd have to be mad to sign up for sale to the corporate sector. This is not going to end well.

    PS Brain surgery is actually really boring!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aren't the likes of the BMA financial products? If there is a failure to support members could this be misselling? In which case could this be potentially a referral to the financial ombudsman or indeed a class action by GPs en mass due to the BMAs failure to represent its members?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    I am the head of the academic primary care department at Imperial College London. I don't feel that the environment in my medical school is 'toxic'. In fact, the environment for academic primary care in my own medical school has probably never been better.

    We are expanding primary care based teaching and research. We are also developing innovative programmes for teaching new skills such as the case management of patients with complex health needs. Students are very positive about their experiences with us and we have recently established an undergraduate GP society – see http://goo.gl/B6ezDu

    If GP recruitment and retention is falling, it's not linked to the environment in medical schools but rather to the pay and working conditions of NHS GPs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They seem to have serious problems with REFLECTION and finding solutions to the problem they may have contributed to loom.
    For example, they kept on bashing the GP trainees for failing the CSA, an exam which has no transparency. They continue to conduct it behind the closed doors. No real prospect of appealing examiners decisions fairly. Deliberate deprivation of evidence to challenge the outcome of the exam!!
    Now they seem to have picked the fight with the Medical schools to cover up the real reasons why many graduates do not want to get in to GP training.
    I WONDER WHAT MEASURES RCGP HAS TAKEN TO ENCOURAGE MEDICAL STUDENTS OR QUALIFIED DOCTORS TO CHOOSE GENERAL PRACTISE OTHER THAN CONTRIBUTING TO RELEASE HUNDREDS OF DOCTORS AFTER THREE YEARS OF GP TRAINING WHICH WAS FUNDED BY THE TAX PAYERS MONEY???
    ONE SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THE “TOXINS” IN THEIR OWN BACK GARDEN FIRST BEFORE POINTING FINGERS TO OTHERS “TOXINS”!!
    -LWT

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • I am a GP. I have a 3yr old daughter. I hope, from the fact that she rarely sees me, and if the government have their way, she will see me even less, is enough to persuade her of the folly of entering NHS medicine and particularly, General Practice. I will do my very best to ensure she never enters the remnants of this "profession", and if she does, persaude her to emigrate at the very first opportunity to a country where doctors are valued. I teach medical students about general practice - but it is not my job to persuade them to come into the job. They can see with their own eyes what 20 years of unfettered demand, fed by the cardies of the RCGP, has made of the job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have always tried to be fair to the RCGP and tried to see both sides when they have been criticised. sometimes the barbs have been fair and sometimes not but I finding it hard to remember any good news coming out of the RCGP. They are increasingly being seen as out of touch and too cooncerned with appearance. The problem is that this is reality and not a perception.
    They constantly nag us to become Fellows but who would want to be a Fellow of a College that is a laughing stock. There was a time when the other Collegs treated the RCGP with some respect but now they regard it as a joke. Not angry but very sad. And dont say try and change it, then. the same names come up for election and you knwo who will be elected for Council and don't you dare step outside the party line.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry Azeem, I qualified from Imperial College in 2002 (mine is the first comment on page 2) and I am afraid what you say is just not true, unless a lot has changed in these last 12 years. I know people who have qualified in the last few years from Imperial as well and they tell me it is just the same. The attitudes of the lecturers and consultants/professors have to change, and it is not likely in our generation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry at the big 4 medical schools: oxford, cambridge, UCL and Imperial: no one within the faculty gives much respect to Public Health or Primary Care.

    But having said that the RCGP problems are of its own creation. The CSA has no credibility across a number of areas. The RCGP ignores major issues for ideological reasons and whilst GP pay is so poor why would new graduates with heavy debts bother with it.

    It is a very simple problem, easy to solve. And the fact it isn't being discussed suggests the problems will worsen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the obvious answer is to get more GPs to lecture in medical schools. Primary care was quite well regarded when I was a student because the teachers were pretty good.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say