This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

RCGP reviewing whether MRCGP exam is ‘fit for purpose’

Exclusive The RCGP has drafted in consultants to carry out a ‘comprehensive review’ of its controversial MRCGP exam, which will look at whether the assessment is ‘fit for purpose’.

It is also looking at whether ‘fairness to candidates’ is sufficiently considered at ‘all stages of test design and delivery’, following controversy around the gap in pass rates between white and BME candidates.

The college said that it is undertaking the review now because the exam has been running for 10 years and is ‘therefore at an appropriate point at which to evaluate its content and structure’.

It is also ensuring that the exam is in line with the GMC’s revised standards for postgraduate curricula, published in May.

The Health Professional Assessment Consultancy has been appointed is to review the MRCGP assessment – including the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT), the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) and the Workplace Based Assessment (WPBA) - and suggest potential changes.

According to a paper presented at this month’s RCGP council meeting, the review is expected to include answers to the following questions:

  • Is the current programme of assessment fit for the purpose of a postgraduate medical license?
  • Are there emerging evidence-based assessment methodologies that the RCGP should consider to ensure that the MRCGP remains fit for purpose and adaptable?
  • Does the programme of assessment meet the requirements of the GMC’s Standards for Curriculum and Assessment Review, including the proposed General Professional Competences?
  • Is fairness to candidates sufficiently considered at all stages of test design and delivery?
  • Are the current standards appropriate to ensure patient safety?
  • What enhancements to test development, standard setting and quality assurance methodologies might be appropriate?

The MRCGP has come under fire in the past on a number of issues. In 2015, Pulse reported that the BMA had concerns over perceived high fees.

Meanwhile GP leaders have previously called on the RCGP to look at reforming the training process, with former college chair Professor Clare Gerada questioning the necessity of the CSA aspect of the exam.

And the exam has been the subject of a long-running dispute about the differences in failure rates between UK white and BME graduates and international medical graduates, which sparked a judicial review hearing instigated by the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) in 2014.

The review ruled that the exam was lawful but the judge stressed that the RCGP needed to ‘eliminate discrimination’ in the MRCGP and tackle the differences in failure rates between white and non-white medical graduates sitting the CSA.

 

 

Readers' comments (38)

  • Vinci Ho

    (1) Allowing more non-medics to become doctors and then GPs seems to become an inevitable reality . This government must bear the responsibility on all the consequences, whatever they are.
    (2) One examination to judge is always subjected to controversies. Unconscious bias was the legal diagnosis from court on MRCGP examination. Inaction to, at least , provide an alternative is in fact continuing to erode the credibility( whatever is left)of the college .
    (3) Funding more education programmes to help new MRCGPs for further development in general practice is more essential. Learning never stops after completing an examination.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is standard practice to do a review. The GMC is involved because they set all standards for postgraduate exams.
    There certainly maybe unconscious bias acting but it does not explain why certain ethnicity does less well in machine marked papers. That is the crucial question.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suspect the examination needs to be made easier to help facilitate the recruitment drive for GPs and what better way to do these by announcing a ''review''

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Caldwell

    Fitness for purpose after it's been going a long time. Probably standard practice. But a headline that does not engender confidence in RCGP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it is a fairly good assessment but it is difficult..and expensive

    I worry about the unfairness of it when they are shipping in unqualified GP's from Europe in countries where they dont have VTS schemes and haven't done exams.They are bypassing the system and seem to be able to practice without the MRCGP.

    Also there plenty of nurse practitioners who are practising on undifferentiated patients with a fairly minimal course....

    It all seems a bit unequal, unfair.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well if non-medical professionals can practice but those who marginally failed CSA can't, what can possibly be considered as a reasonable purpose achieved by the system? How is the fitness for purpose going to be assessed we'll probably never find out. Hasn't RCGP quite clearly already failed it's purpose by all methods of measurement? Don't we already know what the result of this assessment is going to be? Oh well, it really looks like nobody is genuinely touched by any common sense. Failing MRCGP by 5 marks makes you incompetent to practice as a GP while non-medical professionals are sought after in order to put things right. Is this not in itself a system failure?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is no doubt that it's a biased exam.it depends on your colour ,sex and how good is your acting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Complete shambles - always has been and likely always will be - only remarkable in that RCGP and GMC presume themselves to be standards of quality but are infamous for only maintaining their own accelerating dysfunctionality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe a review allows them to charge even more! That wine cellar won't fill itself and the cardies may be forced to actually do some clinical work if they're not sitting in London weaving baskets and planning "training" whilst we all sink ever deeper...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CSA is not a perfect exam but is better than nothing. It is pretty straight forward - 1 problem per 10 minutes, minimal examination as the patients are actors and no notes to record. It is very expensive, however. The concern, as mentioned previously, is the push for GPs from the EU, some of whom have little or no postgraduate qualifications or evidence of basic competence. I worry about clinical standards and the knock on effect this could have for the profession as a whole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say