This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

RCGP urged to explain £10m net income from MRCGP over five years

Exclusive The GPC has called for talks with the RCGP over the £10m net income it has made from trainees taking the MRCGP exam in the past five years, Pulse can reveal.

An analysis of the RCGP annual accounts from 2010 to 2014 reveals that the college has earned on average £2.1m a year from exams after direct costs are taken into account.

The BMA has said it is going to meet with the college regarding the transparency of their exam fees, and said they were concerned that trainees were being made to fund the college’s activities.

But the college insisted that the exam was ‘cost neutral’ and the additional income is used for other overheads related to the exam.

It comes after the college increased the costs of membership for trainees last week in order to reduce exam fees - a decision that was criticised by the BMA.

A Pulse analysis of Charity Commission data shows that the college had a net income of more than £2.8 million from exams last year, when income from exams hit £8.3m and costs were £5.6m.

The overall net income for all the college’s activities last year stood at £2.3m, after costs of £37.5m.

Dr Helen Stokes-Lampard, honorary treasurer for the RCGP, said: ‘The figures only indicate the obvious costs of examinations and do not take into account the considerable overheads involved with running a professional licensing examination, such as the MRCGP assessment.

‘The exam is cost neutral in that any income generated is wholly spent on costs associated with essential aspects of the delivering the MRCGP, without which it could not adequately function or develop in line with ongoing reviews of systems and adherence to evolving GMC requirements.’

She said that this includes the ‘organisation of committees to oversee exam development and quality management’, as well as the ‘development of guidance and new exam tools, equality and diversity reviews, and ongoing engagement with trainees and trainers.’

She added: ‘Some indirect costs of the exam, for example running and maintenance of our CSA exam centre, are funded by different departments across the College and are recorded as such, therefore making it difficult to provide a meaningful or accurate explanation without sharing confidential information, such as that about salaries or staffing arrangements, and in some cases, commercially sensitive, data.’

The BMA told Pulse that they would be meeting with the RCGP to discuss the transparency of their fees for trainees, and reiterated their call for clarity on how income from exams was spent.

A spokesperson said: ‘We are concerned about the rising fee costs that are now being borne by GP trainees and the transparency around how the income generated from the fees is being spent.’

‘We do appreciate that in a scheme this large there are going to be significant administration costs, but GP trainees need to have confidence they are getting value for money. We are meeting the RCGP to put our concerns directly to them and to urge greater openness in this entire area.’

The BMA has already called the college’s plan to hike its trainee membership fee by £595 a year ‘unjustifiable’, though the RCGP says reducing exam fees by £409 per attempt will make it fairer.

This is particularly important for black and minority ethnic trainees who have a lower pass rate for the Clinical Skills Assessment component of the MRCGP.

The difference in pass rate was used as a core part of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin’s call for a judicial review of the MRCGP, which found the college processes were not discriminatory, but did call on them to address the different CSA success rates between white and non-white graduates.

Please note that this article was amended at 6pm on 15 June to reflect that the RCGP regards the figures provided to the Charity Commission as net income - and not profit.

RCGP exam income and costs 2010-2014


 IncomeCostsNet income
2014 £    8,381,508.00 £  5,633,833.00 £  2,747,675.00
2013 £    8,281,833.00 £  5,111,538.00 £  3,170,295.00
2012 £    7,525,674.00 £  5,883,483.00 £  1,642,191.00
2011 £    6,504,942.00 £  4,700,789.00 £  1,804,153.00
2010 £    5,798,900.00 £  4,471,545.00 £  1,327,355.00
Total £  36,492,857.00 £25,801,188.00 £10,691,669.00


Source: UK Charity Commission


Samsung HD TV - win - online

Take Pulse’s June survey

Want to win a Samsung Smart HD TV? Then take Pulse’s multi-topic survey covering a range of areas affecting general practice.

It should take just a couple of minutes to complete, and will help Pulse gain a vital insight into the views of the profession. 

Readers' comments (145)

  • This comment has been deleted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    I wonder how much the other colleges have made over the same period running exams such as the MRCS/ MRCP etc etc......

    They too have clinical exams that may require the use of simulated patients though im sure they mainly use real life patients with pathology (i'm not sure if these patients are remunerated)

    After 2007 they have grown and they had better take note of the legions of unsatisfied doctors within their ranks; I feel sorry for the lady at the helm currently!! not only has she had to deal with the fallout from the CSA / BAPIO court case debacle, she's entered at a time when hundreds of young GP's are emigrating to earn more money and work in better conditions, NOW THIS!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • In both organisations its called net income not profit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Simples. Stop paying subscription to the RCGP, bankrupt them and lo and behold the Csa, akt will be no more! Never have been an RCGP member and never will be. But gps are wimps and will still keep paying to a pointless organisation for kudos. Sad.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wonder if the comment about IMG's and pitchforks was from Maureen Baker?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been deleted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Forgive me about my ignorance. Perhaps some of you can enlighten me of the part of the history when passing the RCGP exam became the ONLY legitimate way to practise general practice in this country . What was the circumcumstances ? It was under Labour government , wasn't it? Obviously , some hierarchy had granted this 'monopoly' to the college. Any inside story? Bear in mind , Master Yoda eventually becomes the head of Ministry of Love!
    As when I started my practice in 1995 , MRCGP was a voluntary examination . Hence , it was never a 'monopoly' . You would not expect DCH , DRCOG examination fee to be anything near to that charged by RCGP and certainly not a 'membership' fee. The letters being carried behind your name was to honour what you have achieved . But to constantly pay a fee to keep those letters 'alive' is to me somewhat betraying principles . Yes, one can say paying the fee shows you are still supporting the 'instituition'. 'Please don't ask what the instituition has done to you , but ask what you have done to the instituition!!'
    But seriously , what has the college done to you members , folks??
    But what do I know, I am only a non-MRCGP old fart who is counting my days.........
    Quote from one of my most favourite films all time :

    What is it with you people? Would you think not getting caught in a lie is the same thing as telling the truth?
    Turner(Robert Redford 1975)
    Three days of Condor

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Vinci Ho

    In a true, accountable democracy, IF, and I say IF, the RCGP were found guilty of skulduggery people would be held to account.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Well said Una Coales. You have been exonerated. Everything that you have said about the RCGP has been proved true in one stroke. I am so glad that I have stopped paying the membership fees. Total waste of money. May more and more GPs see what is happening stop paying membership fees altogether. The silence from the RCGP is deafening. I bet all the Gurus are huddled together somewhere discussing strategy on putting some ` spin ` on this smelly affair. The way ` Profit ` was armtwisted to turn into ` Net Income ` is proof of spin already. Nothing might come of this eventually and it will end up as another mound of dust brushed under the carpet, but its great to see the discomfort in an organization that has been getting too big for its boots. Once again...well done Una.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The RCGP ONLY exists because it has trainees over a barrel who HAVE NO CHOICE but to pay for it!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say