This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Decrease in GP income 'contributing to recruitment problems', finds study

GP partners’ income decreased by 10% in real terms over a nine-year period, which 'may have contributed to current recruitment and retention problems' according to new research findings.

A study by the University of Manchester found that income for GP partners in England dropped from an average of £109,363 in 2008 to £98,373 in 2017 when adjusted for inflation and working patterns.

The research team analysed annual NHS Digital data, which Pulse reported on earlier this year as claiming GP partners' income had risen by 3.5% in the past year, while expenses had reached a 'record high'.

This latest analysis, commissioned by the Government-backed National Institute for Health Research and published in the BJGP, found  the NHS Digital figures may not be a true represenation of GP earnings. This is because they include both NHS and private work - and do not take into account changes to working patterns, such as part-time hours.

The University of Manchester team instead used data from a national GP work-life survey completed by around 1,000 GPs from 2008 to 2017.

They found earnings for salaried GPs in England have also declined in the same time period - by 7% when adjusted for inflation and the number of sessions worked.

In 2008, salaried GPs earned a real income of £58,080 but dropped in 2017 to £51,208.

Additionally, the average number of sessions worked by GP partners dropped from 7.7 to 7 per week, and 5.6 to 5.3 for salaried GPs.

Researchers suggested the downward trend, which is not seen in secondary care, could be playing a part in the GP recruitment crisis.

The study said: ‘It is possible that this downward trend in GP income is contributing to the problems of recruitment and retention. This downward trend in income is not seen for doctors working in hospitals, which is reported as a more appealing career option for doctors in training.’

The study analysed data from reported income from GPs so researchers did acknowledge the data may be 'biased by recall error' or due to 'social desirability bias.'

They found a downward trend in the response rate over the time period so more recent data may not be as accurate - but noted this is in line with an international trend of declining survey response rates.

Recruitment issues have continued to affect GP practices in a crisis town in Kent, causing all practices in Ramsgate to restrict its patient lists over patient safety concerns.

Elsewhere, a trust in Cheshire has taken over its third GP surgery after partners handed over the contract due to recruitment issues.

Readers' comments (10)

  • Took Early Retirement

    In other news, bears start to defaecate in the woods.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The woods have been buried in the bear Sh++ by now.Mor eground breaking UK academic reasearch.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Big surprise. In any job, salary and working conditions count. People are looking elsewhere. Putting in more regulations, encouraging more complaints, asking GPs to do more scores and blockages to referrals and making the job almost impossible is not helping.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nhsfatcat

    Holmes! I’m constipated.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But our workload has also gone up by 20% over the same period in order to compensate for this drop in income.
    We should tug our forelocks and be grateful to our government masters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THE "DAILY NUTTER" HAS GOT HOLD OF THIS I WOULD IMAGINE.
    THERE WILL BE THE USUAL DISTORTIONS AND GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA.

    ONCE AGAIN THE "DAILY NUTTER" ARE HARMING SOCIETY THROUGH A MISGUIDED LOYALTY TO THE TORIES

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Last Man Standing
    Not surprising really. Mail is the unofficial propaganda sheet for the far right. At least since the 1930's if not before. Hurrah for the Blackshirts!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    When doctors like us warned people 5 years ago that HMG had an agenda of dismantling the GP partnership model, we were dismissed as alarmist cynical cranks.
    But now, with old partners fleeing into retirement and young GPs not touching toxic partnerships with a barge pole, the final piece of damning evidence is laid bare.
    Money walks, BS talks. Who in their right mind would take on a partnership with falling income, increasing workload/regulation/paperwork/CQC etc etc?
    And now the remaining bewildered partners (trapped in Last Man Standing Hell) are being herded into Networks so they can beg for crumbs of funding just to stay afloat.
    If HMG wanted to kill partnerships, then it should have said so and announced a Plan B.
    But slowly starving us into submission (whilst having the nerve to repeatedly state support for partnerships) is cruel and chaotic, unfair on patients, deeply deceptive, and above all cowardly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Oops, money talks, BS walks.....sorry!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • well well - fancy that !! come to locumland where all is sunny, you control your hours, fees, holidays, days off etc etc etc etc............

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say