This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

GPs could have to pay locum tax and NIC under new legislation

GP practices could be caught up in new tax legislation aimed at stopping contractors using companies to pay lower tax and national insurance contributions, medical accountants have warned.

Under new 'IR35' legislation coming in next month, any company who pay contractors through a company - including GP practices using locums - will need to check in each instance if they are liable for paying tax and NIC at source.

Medical accountants said that the changes are likely to lead to more locums becoming subject to higher tax and National Insurance, which could lead to locums increasing their rates.

HMRC is cracking down on individuals setting up companies and then taking money out as dividends - thereby avoiding National Insurance payments.

It has set a series of tests for contractors and companies who employ them to see if they should be treated as self-employed through an online tool.

Bob Senior, chairman of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants, said: 'Historically a GP practice could pay a company providing locum doctor services without deducting tax and NIC.

'The doctor could then pay a much lower tax and NIC bill when they took the money from the company than they would have faced had they been an employee.'

'HMRC frankly think that GPs using such companies are abusing the system and not paying enough tax and NIC.'

And he said that from 6 April, when the new legislation comes in, 'any practice paying a locum through a company will have to run that status checker to see if they can continue to make the payment to the company without deducting tax and NIC'.

He added: 'From my initial assessment it looks like they won’t in future be able to make such payments without deducting tax and NIC even though they are making the payment to a company.

'This is intended to affect the locum however given the shortage of doctors it is not impossible that the locum companies will want to increase their rates to cover some of the increased costs.'

An update from HRMC said: 'From April 2017 there are changes to the way the current intermediaries legislation (known as IR35) is applied to off-payroll working in the public sector.

'Where the rules apply, people who work in the public sector through an intermediary will pay employment taxes in a similar way to employees.'

The reform applies to payments made 'on or after 6 April 2017', including 'payments made for contracts entered into before that date', it added.

Readers' comments (15)

  • Total discrimination. Other professions and trades operate within limited companies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If they do this, cut and close services provided,if cant practice in saftey send thing to secondary care.Discrimination absolutely.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctors, start making preparations to move out of uk soon, rather than later, you are losing valuable year of liFe staying in NHS, It is going to be more worse, if have moved out to Australia and i feel more relieved, less tired, less stressed and less exhausted.
    Other countries , including Australia will be closing the doors soon, so hurry up!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Council of Despair

    spoke to agency about this and the impact is not clear as the government has deliberately delayed details to the last minute.

    if you try the online calculator some questions are open to interpretation and depending on what you select you either get caught or are exempt!

    the issue is the 'control' is out of our hands and we will have to depend on the intermediary to decide. It's not clear how to challenge their decision and some haven't decided yet how they will respond. In the mean time the clock is ticking. It's very poor governance to impose a change without outlining the details - looks like UK government is going the same way as Trumpland i.e. impose and worry about implementation afterwards.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do locums work through a company anyway as then they lose pension?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say